初级保健中未确诊的痴呆:一项记录关联研究

C. Aldus, A. Arthur, Abi Dennington-Price, P. Millac, P. Richmond, T. Dening, C. Fox, F. Matthews, L. Robinson, B. Stephan, C. Brayne, G. Savva
{"title":"初级保健中未确诊的痴呆:一项记录关联研究","authors":"C. Aldus, A. Arthur, Abi Dennington-Price, P. Millac, P. Richmond, T. Dening, C. Fox, F. Matthews, L. Robinson, B. Stephan, C. Brayne, G. Savva","doi":"10.3310/hsdr08200","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background The number of people living with dementia is greater than the number with a diagnosis of dementia recorded in primary care. This suggests that a significant number are living with dementia that is undiagnosed. Little is known about this group and there is little quantitative evidence regarding the consequences of diagnosis for people with dementia. Objectives The aims of this study were to (1) describe the population meeting the criteria for dementia but without diagnosis, (2) identify predictors of being diagnosed and (3) estimate the effect of diagnosis on mortality, move to residential care, social participation and well-being. Design A record linkage study of a subsample of participants (n = 598) from the Cognitive Function and Ageing Study II (CFAS II) (n = 7796), an existing cohort study of the population of England aged ≥ 65 years, with standardised validated assessment of dementia and consent to access medical records. Data sources Data on dementia diagnoses from each participant’s primary care record and covariate and outcome data from CFAS II. Setting A population-representative cohort of people aged ≥ 65 years from three regions of England between 2008 and 2011. Participants A total of 598 CFAS II participants, which included all those with dementia who consented to medical record linkage (n = 449) and a stratified sample without dementia (n = 149). Main outcome measures The main outcome was presence of a diagnosis of dementia in each participant’s primary care record at the time of their CFAS II assessment(s). Other outcomes were date of death, cognitive performance scores, move to residential care, hospital stays and social participation. Results Among people with dementia, the proportion with a diagnosis in primary care was 34% in 2008–11 and 44% in 2011–13. In both periods, a further 21% had a record of a concern or a referral but no diagnosis. The likelihood of having a recorded diagnosis increased with severity of impairment in memory and orientation, but not with other cognitive impairment. In multivariable analysis, those aged ≥ 90 years and those aged Limitations People with moderate to severe dementia at baseline could not consent to record linkage. The small numbers in some groups limited power to detect effects. Conclusions The lack of relationship between severity of non-memory impairment and diagnosis may reflect low awareness of other symptoms of dementia. There remains little objective evidence for benefits of diagnosis for people with dementia. Future work Potential benefits of diagnosis can be realised only if effective interventions are accessible to patients and carers. Future work should focus on improving support for people living with cognitive impairment. Study registration National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network Central Portfolio Management System (CPMS 30655). Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 8, No. 20. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.","PeriodicalId":12880,"journal":{"name":"Health Services and Delivery Research","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"33","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Undiagnosed dementia in primary care: a record linkage study\",\"authors\":\"C. Aldus, A. Arthur, Abi Dennington-Price, P. Millac, P. Richmond, T. Dening, C. Fox, F. Matthews, L. Robinson, B. Stephan, C. Brayne, G. Savva\",\"doi\":\"10.3310/hsdr08200\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background The number of people living with dementia is greater than the number with a diagnosis of dementia recorded in primary care. This suggests that a significant number are living with dementia that is undiagnosed. Little is known about this group and there is little quantitative evidence regarding the consequences of diagnosis for people with dementia. Objectives The aims of this study were to (1) describe the population meeting the criteria for dementia but without diagnosis, (2) identify predictors of being diagnosed and (3) estimate the effect of diagnosis on mortality, move to residential care, social participation and well-being. Design A record linkage study of a subsample of participants (n = 598) from the Cognitive Function and Ageing Study II (CFAS II) (n = 7796), an existing cohort study of the population of England aged ≥ 65 years, with standardised validated assessment of dementia and consent to access medical records. Data sources Data on dementia diagnoses from each participant’s primary care record and covariate and outcome data from CFAS II. Setting A population-representative cohort of people aged ≥ 65 years from three regions of England between 2008 and 2011. Participants A total of 598 CFAS II participants, which included all those with dementia who consented to medical record linkage (n = 449) and a stratified sample without dementia (n = 149). Main outcome measures The main outcome was presence of a diagnosis of dementia in each participant’s primary care record at the time of their CFAS II assessment(s). Other outcomes were date of death, cognitive performance scores, move to residential care, hospital stays and social participation. Results Among people with dementia, the proportion with a diagnosis in primary care was 34% in 2008–11 and 44% in 2011–13. In both periods, a further 21% had a record of a concern or a referral but no diagnosis. The likelihood of having a recorded diagnosis increased with severity of impairment in memory and orientation, but not with other cognitive impairment. In multivariable analysis, those aged ≥ 90 years and those aged Limitations People with moderate to severe dementia at baseline could not consent to record linkage. The small numbers in some groups limited power to detect effects. Conclusions The lack of relationship between severity of non-memory impairment and diagnosis may reflect low awareness of other symptoms of dementia. There remains little objective evidence for benefits of diagnosis for people with dementia. Future work Potential benefits of diagnosis can be realised only if effective interventions are accessible to patients and carers. Future work should focus on improving support for people living with cognitive impairment. Study registration National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network Central Portfolio Management System (CPMS 30655). Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 8, No. 20. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.\",\"PeriodicalId\":12880,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Health Services and Delivery Research\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"1-108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"33\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Health Services and Delivery Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr08200\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Health Services and Delivery Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3310/hsdr08200","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 33

摘要

背景患有痴呆症的人数比初级保健中诊断为痴呆症的人多。这表明,相当多的人患有未确诊的痴呆症。对这一群体知之甚少,对痴呆症患者的诊断结果也几乎没有定量证据。目的本研究的目的是(1)描述符合痴呆症标准但未被诊断的人群,(2)确定被诊断的预测因素,(3)估计诊断对死亡率、入住护理、社会参与和幸福感的影响。设计对认知功能和老龄化研究II(CFAS II)(n=7796)参与者的子样本(n=598)进行记录关联研究,这是一项针对英格兰≥65岁人群的现有队列研究,对痴呆症进行标准化验证评估,并同意获取医疗记录。数据来源来自每个参与者初级保健记录的痴呆症诊断数据以及来自CFAS II的协变量和结果数据。背景2008年至2011年间,来自英格兰三个地区的年龄≥65岁的人群代表性队列。参与者共有598名CFAS II参与者,其中包括所有同意病历关联的痴呆症患者(n=449)和无痴呆症的分层样本(n=149)。主要结果测量主要结果是在进行CFAS II评估时,每个参与者的初级保健记录中都有痴呆症的诊断。其他结果包括死亡日期、认知表现得分、转入住院护理、住院和社会参与。结果在痴呆症患者中,2008-2011年在初级保健中被诊断的比例为34%,2011-2013年为44%。在这两个时期,另有21%的人有顾虑或转诊记录,但没有诊断。记录诊断的可能性随着记忆和定向障碍的严重程度而增加,但与其他认知障碍无关。在多变量分析中,年龄≥90岁的人和年龄限制基线时患有中度至重度痴呆症的人不同意记录关联。一些群体中的少数人限制了检测效果的能力。结论非记忆障碍的严重程度与诊断之间缺乏相关性,可能反映出对痴呆其他症状的认识不足。对于痴呆症患者的诊断益处,几乎没有客观证据。未来的工作只有患者和护理人员能够获得有效的干预措施,诊断的潜在好处才能实现。未来的工作应侧重于改善对认知障碍患者的支持。研究注册国家卫生研究所临床研究网络中央档案管理系统(CPMS 30655)。资助该项目由国家卫生研究所(NIHR)卫生服务和交付研究计划资助,并将在《卫生服务与交付研究》上全文发表;第8卷,第20期。有关更多项目信息,请访问NIHR期刊图书馆网站。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Undiagnosed dementia in primary care: a record linkage study
Background The number of people living with dementia is greater than the number with a diagnosis of dementia recorded in primary care. This suggests that a significant number are living with dementia that is undiagnosed. Little is known about this group and there is little quantitative evidence regarding the consequences of diagnosis for people with dementia. Objectives The aims of this study were to (1) describe the population meeting the criteria for dementia but without diagnosis, (2) identify predictors of being diagnosed and (3) estimate the effect of diagnosis on mortality, move to residential care, social participation and well-being. Design A record linkage study of a subsample of participants (n = 598) from the Cognitive Function and Ageing Study II (CFAS II) (n = 7796), an existing cohort study of the population of England aged ≥ 65 years, with standardised validated assessment of dementia and consent to access medical records. Data sources Data on dementia diagnoses from each participant’s primary care record and covariate and outcome data from CFAS II. Setting A population-representative cohort of people aged ≥ 65 years from three regions of England between 2008 and 2011. Participants A total of 598 CFAS II participants, which included all those with dementia who consented to medical record linkage (n = 449) and a stratified sample without dementia (n = 149). Main outcome measures The main outcome was presence of a diagnosis of dementia in each participant’s primary care record at the time of their CFAS II assessment(s). Other outcomes were date of death, cognitive performance scores, move to residential care, hospital stays and social participation. Results Among people with dementia, the proportion with a diagnosis in primary care was 34% in 2008–11 and 44% in 2011–13. In both periods, a further 21% had a record of a concern or a referral but no diagnosis. The likelihood of having a recorded diagnosis increased with severity of impairment in memory and orientation, but not with other cognitive impairment. In multivariable analysis, those aged ≥ 90 years and those aged Limitations People with moderate to severe dementia at baseline could not consent to record linkage. The small numbers in some groups limited power to detect effects. Conclusions The lack of relationship between severity of non-memory impairment and diagnosis may reflect low awareness of other symptoms of dementia. There remains little objective evidence for benefits of diagnosis for people with dementia. Future work Potential benefits of diagnosis can be realised only if effective interventions are accessible to patients and carers. Future work should focus on improving support for people living with cognitive impairment. Study registration National Institute for Health Research Clinical Research Network Central Portfolio Management System (CPMS 30655). Funding This project was funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Health Services and Delivery Research programme and will be published in full in Health Services and Delivery Research; Vol. 8, No. 20. See the NIHR Journals Library website for further project information.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
1
审稿时长
53 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信