数字成熟度评估模型的系统比较

IF 4 Q2 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
B. Cognet, J. Pernot, L. Rivest, Christophe Danjou
{"title":"数字成熟度评估模型的系统比较","authors":"B. Cognet, J. Pernot, L. Rivest, Christophe Danjou","doi":"10.1080/21681015.2023.2242340","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Assessing the digital maturity of companies is essential to prepare for digital transformation in the context of Industry 4.0. Several digital maturity assessment models have emerged in the past few years to support this evaluation. One obstacle for companies is the impossibility of easily comparing themselves to one another quantitatively or qualitatively. This paper introduces a new way to compare digital maturity models through a quantitative framework that is compatible with a wide variety of models. Comparisons are performed in the space of the keywords used to characterize key performance indicators (KPIs) that are reverse engineered from the models. The matches are encoded in a keyword matrix that is used to automatically compute the match level of KPI pairs. The framework has been validated on 13 state-of-the-art maturity models whose analysis resulted in the identification of 451 KPIs characterized using 263 keywords structured according to 12 dimensions and 58 subdimensions. Graphical Abstract","PeriodicalId":16024,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering","volume":"40 1","pages":"519 - 537"},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Systematic comparison of digital maturity assessment models\",\"authors\":\"B. Cognet, J. Pernot, L. Rivest, Christophe Danjou\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21681015.2023.2242340\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT Assessing the digital maturity of companies is essential to prepare for digital transformation in the context of Industry 4.0. Several digital maturity assessment models have emerged in the past few years to support this evaluation. One obstacle for companies is the impossibility of easily comparing themselves to one another quantitatively or qualitatively. This paper introduces a new way to compare digital maturity models through a quantitative framework that is compatible with a wide variety of models. Comparisons are performed in the space of the keywords used to characterize key performance indicators (KPIs) that are reverse engineered from the models. The matches are encoded in a keyword matrix that is used to automatically compute the match level of KPI pairs. The framework has been validated on 13 state-of-the-art maturity models whose analysis resulted in the identification of 451 KPIs characterized using 263 keywords structured according to 12 dimensions and 58 subdimensions. Graphical Abstract\",\"PeriodicalId\":16024,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering\",\"volume\":\"40 1\",\"pages\":\"519 - 537\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2023.2242340\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Industrial and Production Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21681015.2023.2242340","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

评估企业的数字化成熟度对于为工业4.0背景下的数字化转型做好准备至关重要。在过去几年中出现了几种数字成熟度评估模型来支持这种评估。公司面临的一个障碍是不可能轻易地在数量或质量上与其他公司进行比较。本文介绍了一种新的方法来比较数字成熟度模型通过一个定量框架,是兼容各种各样的模型。在用于描述关键性能指标(kpi)的关键字的空间中执行比较,这些指标是从模型中逆向工程的。匹配被编码在关键字矩阵中,该矩阵用于自动计算KPI对的匹配级别。该框架已在13个最先进的成熟度模型上进行了验证,这些模型的分析结果确定了451个kpi,这些kpi使用263个关键词,根据12个维度和58个子维度构建。图形抽象
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Systematic comparison of digital maturity assessment models
ABSTRACT Assessing the digital maturity of companies is essential to prepare for digital transformation in the context of Industry 4.0. Several digital maturity assessment models have emerged in the past few years to support this evaluation. One obstacle for companies is the impossibility of easily comparing themselves to one another quantitatively or qualitatively. This paper introduces a new way to compare digital maturity models through a quantitative framework that is compatible with a wide variety of models. Comparisons are performed in the space of the keywords used to characterize key performance indicators (KPIs) that are reverse engineered from the models. The matches are encoded in a keyword matrix that is used to automatically compute the match level of KPI pairs. The framework has been validated on 13 state-of-the-art maturity models whose analysis resulted in the identification of 451 KPIs characterized using 263 keywords structured according to 12 dimensions and 58 subdimensions. Graphical Abstract
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.50
自引率
6.70%
发文量
21
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信