横向后张法混凝土箱梁桥面板分析

IF 0.8 Q4 ENGINEERING, CIVIL
J. Edmunds, L. Franco, T. Jayasinghe, Thusitha Ginigaddara, P. Vaz-Serra, P. Mendis
{"title":"横向后张法混凝土箱梁桥面板分析","authors":"J. Edmunds, L. Franco, T. Jayasinghe, Thusitha Ginigaddara, P. Vaz-Serra, P. Mendis","doi":"10.56748/ejse.234101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"For rural bridges in Australia, a common design practice is pouring in-situ concrete on top of beams in order to tie all the beams together and distribute load. However, pouring concrete on-site creates more risk and contractors prefer to avoid it. Another method is using transverse post tensioning to tie beams. This article investigated the behaviour of transverse post-tensioning bars in providing load distribution between beams and ultimately comment on their effectiveness compared to in-situ poured decks. Currently, the industry has not completely investigated this matter in order to design post-tensioning accurately. Conservative estimates are currently used in industry today. Current practice is 50% of the design load on the beam where the load is applied in their design assumptions which is quite high. The team modelled concrete box girder bridges with transverse post-tensioning using grillage method. Several factors were investigated including bridge length and width, bridge skew and beam type. From the models, the team concluded that increasing the bridge span increases the load distribution, the load distribution difference is negligible for skew between 0 and 20 degrees and larger shear actions are observed with increased skew and width. It was determined that the worst-case total load on the beam where the load as applied was found to be 40.5%, 9.5% less than current practice. It is recommended that a similar investigation is conducted using a finite element method to gain a deeper understanding.","PeriodicalId":52513,"journal":{"name":"Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bridge deck analysis of transversely post-tensioned concrete box girder bridges\",\"authors\":\"J. Edmunds, L. Franco, T. Jayasinghe, Thusitha Ginigaddara, P. Vaz-Serra, P. Mendis\",\"doi\":\"10.56748/ejse.234101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"For rural bridges in Australia, a common design practice is pouring in-situ concrete on top of beams in order to tie all the beams together and distribute load. However, pouring concrete on-site creates more risk and contractors prefer to avoid it. Another method is using transverse post tensioning to tie beams. This article investigated the behaviour of transverse post-tensioning bars in providing load distribution between beams and ultimately comment on their effectiveness compared to in-situ poured decks. Currently, the industry has not completely investigated this matter in order to design post-tensioning accurately. Conservative estimates are currently used in industry today. Current practice is 50% of the design load on the beam where the load is applied in their design assumptions which is quite high. The team modelled concrete box girder bridges with transverse post-tensioning using grillage method. Several factors were investigated including bridge length and width, bridge skew and beam type. From the models, the team concluded that increasing the bridge span increases the load distribution, the load distribution difference is negligible for skew between 0 and 20 degrees and larger shear actions are observed with increased skew and width. It was determined that the worst-case total load on the beam where the load as applied was found to be 40.5%, 9.5% less than current practice. It is recommended that a similar investigation is conducted using a finite element method to gain a deeper understanding.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52513,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.56748/ejse.234101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, CIVIL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.56748/ejse.234101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, CIVIL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

对于澳大利亚的乡村桥梁,一种常见的设计做法是在梁的顶部浇筑混凝土,以便将所有梁绑在一起并分配荷载。然而,现场浇筑混凝土会产生更多的风险,承包商倾向于避免这种风险。另一种方法是使用横向后张拉来系梁。本文研究了横向后张筋在梁之间提供荷载分布的行为,并最终评论了它们与原位浇筑甲板相比的有效性。目前,业界还没有对这一问题进行全面的调查,以便准确地设计后张紧。目前工业上使用的是保守估计。目前的做法是50%的设计荷载在梁上,在他们的设计假设中,荷载是相当高的。该团队模拟了混凝土箱梁桥横向后张拉采用格栅法。研究了桥梁长度和宽度、桥梁斜度和梁型等因素。从模型中,研究小组得出结论,增加桥梁跨度会增加荷载分布,荷载分布差异在0到20度之间可以忽略不计,随着斜度和宽度的增加,观察到更大的剪切作用。结果表明,梁上的最坏情况总荷载为40.5%,比目前的实际情况低9.5%。建议使用有限元方法进行类似的调查,以获得更深入的了解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Bridge deck analysis of transversely post-tensioned concrete box girder bridges
For rural bridges in Australia, a common design practice is pouring in-situ concrete on top of beams in order to tie all the beams together and distribute load. However, pouring concrete on-site creates more risk and contractors prefer to avoid it. Another method is using transverse post tensioning to tie beams. This article investigated the behaviour of transverse post-tensioning bars in providing load distribution between beams and ultimately comment on their effectiveness compared to in-situ poured decks. Currently, the industry has not completely investigated this matter in order to design post-tensioning accurately. Conservative estimates are currently used in industry today. Current practice is 50% of the design load on the beam where the load is applied in their design assumptions which is quite high. The team modelled concrete box girder bridges with transverse post-tensioning using grillage method. Several factors were investigated including bridge length and width, bridge skew and beam type. From the models, the team concluded that increasing the bridge span increases the load distribution, the load distribution difference is negligible for skew between 0 and 20 degrees and larger shear actions are observed with increased skew and width. It was determined that the worst-case total load on the beam where the load as applied was found to be 40.5%, 9.5% less than current practice. It is recommended that a similar investigation is conducted using a finite element method to gain a deeper understanding.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering
Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering Engineering-Civil and Structural Engineering
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
16.70%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Electronic Journal of Structural Engineering (EJSE) is an international forum for the dissemination and discussion of leading edge research and practical applications in Structural Engineering. It comprises peer-reviewed technical papers, discussions and comments, and also news about conferences, workshops etc. in Structural Engineering. Original papers are invited from individuals involved in the field of structural engineering and construction. The areas of special interests include the following, but are not limited to: Analytical and design methods Bridges and High-rise Buildings Case studies and failure investigation Innovations in design and new technology New Construction Materials Performance of Structures Prefabrication Technology Repairs, Strengthening, and Maintenance Stability and Scaffolding Engineering Soil-structure interaction Standards and Codes of Practice Structural and solid mechanics Structural Safety and Reliability Testing Technologies Vibration, impact and structural dynamics Wind and earthquake engineering. EJSE is seeking original papers (research or state-of the art reviews) of the highest quality for consideration for publication. The papers will be published within 3 to 6 months. The papers are expected to make a significant contribution to the research and development activities of the academic and professional engineering community.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信