{"title":"心理分析中的主体间性:理论与实践的典范","authors":"C. Bell","doi":"10.7565/LANDP.V7I2.1586","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Lewis Kirshner’s recent study Intersubjectivity in Psychoanalysis: A Model for Theory and Practice presents a highly readable and long-needed synoptic account of the diverse meanings and conceptualizations of intersubjectivity informing current psychoanalytic practice. Kirshner notes that the term ‘intersubjectivity’ was not commonly invoked in psychoanalytic theorizing before 1980, yet from the 1980’s onwards its use has increased dramatically. The concept of intersubjectivity within psychoanalysis is most closely associated with the interpersonal turn that has roots in Sandor Ferenzci’s early critique of the analyst playing a neutral or objective role in interpreting the unconscious meaning of symptoms and Harry Stack Sullivan’s critique of Freud’s concept of anxiety as predominantly a signal anxiety to the ego indicating the imminent emergence of hitherto repressed ideas into conscious awareness.","PeriodicalId":40968,"journal":{"name":"Language and Psychoanalysis","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2018-11-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intersubjectivity in Psychoanalysis: A Model for Theory and Practice\",\"authors\":\"C. Bell\",\"doi\":\"10.7565/LANDP.V7I2.1586\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Lewis Kirshner’s recent study Intersubjectivity in Psychoanalysis: A Model for Theory and Practice presents a highly readable and long-needed synoptic account of the diverse meanings and conceptualizations of intersubjectivity informing current psychoanalytic practice. Kirshner notes that the term ‘intersubjectivity’ was not commonly invoked in psychoanalytic theorizing before 1980, yet from the 1980’s onwards its use has increased dramatically. The concept of intersubjectivity within psychoanalysis is most closely associated with the interpersonal turn that has roots in Sandor Ferenzci’s early critique of the analyst playing a neutral or objective role in interpreting the unconscious meaning of symptoms and Harry Stack Sullivan’s critique of Freud’s concept of anxiety as predominantly a signal anxiety to the ego indicating the imminent emergence of hitherto repressed ideas into conscious awareness.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40968,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language and Psychoanalysis\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2018-11-23\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language and Psychoanalysis\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7565/LANDP.V7I2.1586\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and Psychoanalysis","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7565/LANDP.V7I2.1586","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
刘易斯·科什纳(Lewis Kirshner)最近的研究《精神分析中的主体间性:理论与实践的模型》(Intersubjectivity in Psychoanalysis: A Model for Theory and Practice)对当前精神分析实践中主体间性的不同含义和概念化进行了高度可读和长期需要的概要描述。科什纳指出,在1980年之前,“主体间性”一词在精神分析理论中并不常见,但从1980年代开始,它的使用急剧增加。精神分析中的主体间性概念与人际转向最密切相关,这种转向源于桑德尔·费伦齐(Sandor Ferenzci)早期对分析师的批评,他在解释症状的无意识意义时扮演中立或客观的角色,以及哈里·斯塔克·沙利文(Harry Stack Sullivan)对弗洛伊德焦虑概念的批评,弗洛伊德焦虑概念主要是对自我的信号焦虑,表明迄今为止被压抑的想法即将出现在意识意识中。
Intersubjectivity in Psychoanalysis: A Model for Theory and Practice
Lewis Kirshner’s recent study Intersubjectivity in Psychoanalysis: A Model for Theory and Practice presents a highly readable and long-needed synoptic account of the diverse meanings and conceptualizations of intersubjectivity informing current psychoanalytic practice. Kirshner notes that the term ‘intersubjectivity’ was not commonly invoked in psychoanalytic theorizing before 1980, yet from the 1980’s onwards its use has increased dramatically. The concept of intersubjectivity within psychoanalysis is most closely associated with the interpersonal turn that has roots in Sandor Ferenzci’s early critique of the analyst playing a neutral or objective role in interpreting the unconscious meaning of symptoms and Harry Stack Sullivan’s critique of Freud’s concept of anxiety as predominantly a signal anxiety to the ego indicating the imminent emergence of hitherto repressed ideas into conscious awareness.