生物预科学生学习计划分析(RPP)

EDUSAINS Pub Date : 2019-02-15 DOI:10.15408/ES.V8I2.4059
R. Suciati, Y. Astuti
{"title":"生物预科学生学习计划分析(RPP)","authors":"R. Suciati, Y. Astuti","doi":"10.15408/ES.V8I2.4059","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract The study aimed to find out the quality of prospective biology teacher lesson plan based on component standard of lesson plan (BSNP). The sample was the VI semester biology education student choosen by stratified random sampling. The data was collected through 10 component of checklist. The result shows: 1) the form of lesson plan made is valued 10 (18,18%), 8 (27,27%), and 5 (3,03%); 2) the learning indicator development, 27,27% are appropriate with KI/KD; 3) in cognitive skill indicator development, C2 is the highest (55,12%), and C6 is the lowest (0,79%); 4) the clarity in detailing the scientific based teaching-learning situation, 18,18% are very detail, systematic, and relevant to indicators 5) the conformity in choosing and using the learning method reaches 39,39%, and 30,30% students can connect the learning media and the learning method, KI/KD, and indicator; 6) 18,18% students used the various learning source; 7) 33,33% material selection is approriate with the indicator; 8) 48,48% students can detail the time allocation in teaching-learning scenario; 9) in the evaluation aimed, 48,08% refers to science concept (science product), 15,38% (science process), 36,54% scientific attitude; 10) in the learning evaluation technic, 34,67% (essay), 26,67% (observation), and 24% (performance assesment). Overall, the ability of prospective biology teachers in compossing standard lesson plan are in quite good category, but the conformity of indicators with KI/KD, method chose, media, the learning source, and the proper materials are need to be improved. The selection of learning technic evaluation are various. Keywords: lesson plan analysis; prospective teacher Abstrak Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui kualitas RPP mahasiswa calon guru biologi sesuai standar komponen RPP (BSNP). Sampel merupakan mahasiswa biologi semester VI, stratified random sampling. Pengumpulan data melalui checklist dengan 10 komponen. Diperoleh hasil: 1) Format RPP yang dibuat, nilai 10 (18,18%), 8 (27,27%), dan 5 (3,03%), 2) Pengembangan indikator pembelajaran, 27,27% sesuai dengan KI/KD, 3) Pengembangan indikator kemampuan kognitif, tertinggi C2 (55,12%), dan terendah C6 (0,79%), 4) Kejelasan merinci KBM berbasis pendekatan ilmiah, 18.18% sangat rinci, sistematis, relevan dengan indikator; 5) Kesesuaian memilih dan menggunakan metode belajar untuk pencapaian indikator 39,39% dan 30,30% mampu merelevansikan antara media/alat belajar dengan metode belajar serta KI/KD dan indikator, 6) 18,18% menggunakan sumber belajar bervariasi, 7) Pemilihan materi pembelajaran sesuai indikator (33,33%), 8) Kemampuan merinci alokasi waktu dalam skenario KBM (48,48%), 9) Sasaran penilaian yang dituju, 48.08% mengacu pada konsep sains (produk sains), 15.38% (proses sains), dan 36,54% (sikap ilmiah), 10) Pemilihan teknik evaluasi pembelajaran, 34,67% (tes uraian), 26,67% (teknik observasi), dan 24% (asesmen kinerja). Secara keseluruhan, kemampuan mahasiswa calon guru Biologi dalam menyusun RPP yang memenuhi standar dalam kategori cukup baik, namun kesesuaian indikator dengan KI/KD, pemilihan metode, media, sumber belajar, dan kesesuaian materi masih perlu diperbaiki. Pemilihan teknik evaluasi pembelajaran pun beragam. Kata Kunci: analisis RPP; calon guru  Permalink/DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15408/es.v8i2.4059  ","PeriodicalId":31079,"journal":{"name":"EDUSAINS","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-02-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"12","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ANALISIS RENCANA PELAKSANAAN PEMBELAJARAN (RPP) MAHASISWA CALON GURU BIOLOGI\",\"authors\":\"R. Suciati, Y. Astuti\",\"doi\":\"10.15408/ES.V8I2.4059\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract The study aimed to find out the quality of prospective biology teacher lesson plan based on component standard of lesson plan (BSNP). The sample was the VI semester biology education student choosen by stratified random sampling. The data was collected through 10 component of checklist. The result shows: 1) the form of lesson plan made is valued 10 (18,18%), 8 (27,27%), and 5 (3,03%); 2) the learning indicator development, 27,27% are appropriate with KI/KD; 3) in cognitive skill indicator development, C2 is the highest (55,12%), and C6 is the lowest (0,79%); 4) the clarity in detailing the scientific based teaching-learning situation, 18,18% are very detail, systematic, and relevant to indicators 5) the conformity in choosing and using the learning method reaches 39,39%, and 30,30% students can connect the learning media and the learning method, KI/KD, and indicator; 6) 18,18% students used the various learning source; 7) 33,33% material selection is approriate with the indicator; 8) 48,48% students can detail the time allocation in teaching-learning scenario; 9) in the evaluation aimed, 48,08% refers to science concept (science product), 15,38% (science process), 36,54% scientific attitude; 10) in the learning evaluation technic, 34,67% (essay), 26,67% (observation), and 24% (performance assesment). Overall, the ability of prospective biology teachers in compossing standard lesson plan are in quite good category, but the conformity of indicators with KI/KD, method chose, media, the learning source, and the proper materials are need to be improved. The selection of learning technic evaluation are various. Keywords: lesson plan analysis; prospective teacher Abstrak Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui kualitas RPP mahasiswa calon guru biologi sesuai standar komponen RPP (BSNP). Sampel merupakan mahasiswa biologi semester VI, stratified random sampling. Pengumpulan data melalui checklist dengan 10 komponen. Diperoleh hasil: 1) Format RPP yang dibuat, nilai 10 (18,18%), 8 (27,27%), dan 5 (3,03%), 2) Pengembangan indikator pembelajaran, 27,27% sesuai dengan KI/KD, 3) Pengembangan indikator kemampuan kognitif, tertinggi C2 (55,12%), dan terendah C6 (0,79%), 4) Kejelasan merinci KBM berbasis pendekatan ilmiah, 18.18% sangat rinci, sistematis, relevan dengan indikator; 5) Kesesuaian memilih dan menggunakan metode belajar untuk pencapaian indikator 39,39% dan 30,30% mampu merelevansikan antara media/alat belajar dengan metode belajar serta KI/KD dan indikator, 6) 18,18% menggunakan sumber belajar bervariasi, 7) Pemilihan materi pembelajaran sesuai indikator (33,33%), 8) Kemampuan merinci alokasi waktu dalam skenario KBM (48,48%), 9) Sasaran penilaian yang dituju, 48.08% mengacu pada konsep sains (produk sains), 15.38% (proses sains), dan 36,54% (sikap ilmiah), 10) Pemilihan teknik evaluasi pembelajaran, 34,67% (tes uraian), 26,67% (teknik observasi), dan 24% (asesmen kinerja). Secara keseluruhan, kemampuan mahasiswa calon guru Biologi dalam menyusun RPP yang memenuhi standar dalam kategori cukup baik, namun kesesuaian indikator dengan KI/KD, pemilihan metode, media, sumber belajar, dan kesesuaian materi masih perlu diperbaiki. Pemilihan teknik evaluasi pembelajaran pun beragam. Kata Kunci: analisis RPP; calon guru  Permalink/DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15408/es.v8i2.4059  \",\"PeriodicalId\":31079,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EDUSAINS\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-02-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"12\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EDUSAINS\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15408/ES.V8I2.4059\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EDUSAINS","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15408/ES.V8I2.4059","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 12

摘要

摘要本研究旨在以课程计划构成标准(BSNP)为基础,了解未来生物教师课程计划的质量。本研究采用分层随机抽样的方法抽取生物教育专业第六学期学生。数据是通过清单的10个组成部分收集的。结果表明:(1)制定的课程计划形式分别为10(18,18%)、8(27,27%)和5(3.03%);2) 学习指标的发展,27,27%与KI/KD相适应;3) 在认知技能指标发展方面,C2最高(55.12%),C6最低(0.79%);4) 在详述科学的教学学习情况方面的清晰度,18,18%的学生非常详细、系统,与指标相关5)在选择和使用学习方法方面的一致性达到39,39%,30,30%的学生能够将学习媒体与学习方法、KI/KD和指标联系起来;6) 18.18%的学生使用各种学习资源;7) 33,33%的材料选择符合指标;8) 48.48%的学生能够在教学情景中详细描述时间分配;9) 在评价目标中,48,08%为科学概念(科学产品),15,38%为科学过程,36,54%为科学态度;10) 在学习评价技术中,论文占34,67%,观察占26,67%,成绩评价占24%。总体而言,未来的生物学教师在编写标准课程计划方面的能力属于较好的类别,但指标与KI/KD、方法选择、媒介、学习来源和适当的材料的一致性仍有待提高。学习技术评价的选择多种多样。关键词:课程计划分析;关键词:课程规划分析;以及未来教师Abstrak研究旨在根据RPP成分标准(BSNP)来确定RPP学生的生物教师候选人的质量。样本为第六学期生物学专业学生的分层随机抽样。通过包含10个组成部分的检查表收集数据。获得的结果:1)形成了RPP格式,10个(18.18%)、8个(27.27%)和5个(3.03%),2)学习指标的发展,根据KI/KD为27.27%,3)认知能力指标的发展(高C2(55.12%)和低C6(0.79%),4)基于KBM仇恨澄清的科学方法,18.18%非常详细、系统,与指标相关5) 选择和使用学习方法以实现指标的兼容性39.39%和30.30%媒体/学习工具与学习方法、KI/KD和指标之间的相关性6)18.18%使用不同的学习来源7)根据指标选择学习材料(33.33%)8)在KBM场景中缩小时间分配的能力(48.48%)9)评估目标,48.08%表示科学概念(科学产品),15.38%表示科学过程,36.54%表示科学态度,10)选择学习评估技术,34.67%表示铀测试,26.67%表示观察技术,24%表示绩效评估。总体而言,生物教师候选人设计符合标准的RPP的能力在一个相当好的类别中,但指标与KI/KD的一致性、方法选择、媒体、学习来源和材料一致性仍有待提高。学习评估技术的选择各不相同。关键词:RPP分析;候选教师[UNK]Permalink/DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.15408/es.v8i2.4059
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
ANALISIS RENCANA PELAKSANAAN PEMBELAJARAN (RPP) MAHASISWA CALON GURU BIOLOGI
Abstract The study aimed to find out the quality of prospective biology teacher lesson plan based on component standard of lesson plan (BSNP). The sample was the VI semester biology education student choosen by stratified random sampling. The data was collected through 10 component of checklist. The result shows: 1) the form of lesson plan made is valued 10 (18,18%), 8 (27,27%), and 5 (3,03%); 2) the learning indicator development, 27,27% are appropriate with KI/KD; 3) in cognitive skill indicator development, C2 is the highest (55,12%), and C6 is the lowest (0,79%); 4) the clarity in detailing the scientific based teaching-learning situation, 18,18% are very detail, systematic, and relevant to indicators 5) the conformity in choosing and using the learning method reaches 39,39%, and 30,30% students can connect the learning media and the learning method, KI/KD, and indicator; 6) 18,18% students used the various learning source; 7) 33,33% material selection is approriate with the indicator; 8) 48,48% students can detail the time allocation in teaching-learning scenario; 9) in the evaluation aimed, 48,08% refers to science concept (science product), 15,38% (science process), 36,54% scientific attitude; 10) in the learning evaluation technic, 34,67% (essay), 26,67% (observation), and 24% (performance assesment). Overall, the ability of prospective biology teachers in compossing standard lesson plan are in quite good category, but the conformity of indicators with KI/KD, method chose, media, the learning source, and the proper materials are need to be improved. The selection of learning technic evaluation are various. Keywords: lesson plan analysis; prospective teacher Abstrak Penelitian bertujuan untuk mengetahui kualitas RPP mahasiswa calon guru biologi sesuai standar komponen RPP (BSNP). Sampel merupakan mahasiswa biologi semester VI, stratified random sampling. Pengumpulan data melalui checklist dengan 10 komponen. Diperoleh hasil: 1) Format RPP yang dibuat, nilai 10 (18,18%), 8 (27,27%), dan 5 (3,03%), 2) Pengembangan indikator pembelajaran, 27,27% sesuai dengan KI/KD, 3) Pengembangan indikator kemampuan kognitif, tertinggi C2 (55,12%), dan terendah C6 (0,79%), 4) Kejelasan merinci KBM berbasis pendekatan ilmiah, 18.18% sangat rinci, sistematis, relevan dengan indikator; 5) Kesesuaian memilih dan menggunakan metode belajar untuk pencapaian indikator 39,39% dan 30,30% mampu merelevansikan antara media/alat belajar dengan metode belajar serta KI/KD dan indikator, 6) 18,18% menggunakan sumber belajar bervariasi, 7) Pemilihan materi pembelajaran sesuai indikator (33,33%), 8) Kemampuan merinci alokasi waktu dalam skenario KBM (48,48%), 9) Sasaran penilaian yang dituju, 48.08% mengacu pada konsep sains (produk sains), 15.38% (proses sains), dan 36,54% (sikap ilmiah), 10) Pemilihan teknik evaluasi pembelajaran, 34,67% (tes uraian), 26,67% (teknik observasi), dan 24% (asesmen kinerja). Secara keseluruhan, kemampuan mahasiswa calon guru Biologi dalam menyusun RPP yang memenuhi standar dalam kategori cukup baik, namun kesesuaian indikator dengan KI/KD, pemilihan metode, media, sumber belajar, dan kesesuaian materi masih perlu diperbaiki. Pemilihan teknik evaluasi pembelajaran pun beragam. Kata Kunci: analisis RPP; calon guru  Permalink/DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.15408/es.v8i2.4059  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信