O. Mughieda, A. Alzo’ubi, Marwan Alzaylaie, Ramesh Vandanapu, Akash Sharma
{"title":"迪拜沉积岩中嵌套桩静侧向响应的经验与数值研究","authors":"O. Mughieda, A. Alzo’ubi, Marwan Alzaylaie, Ramesh Vandanapu, Akash Sharma","doi":"10.1680/jgere.22.00032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In geotechnical engineering practice, it is often a challenging task to select suitable method for calculation of lateral load capacity of piles. In Dubai (United Arab Emirates), predominantly piles are rock socketed with top layers commonly medium dense to dense sand or Dubai sedimentary rock contributing to bearing lateral loads. In present study, two lateral load field test results on piles were selected and used for evaluating various methods adopted by local geotechnical engineers. The ground lithology for piles selected constitutes medium dense to dense sand for top layers, which is critical in evaluation of lateral capacity of piles. Due to simpler input requirements and quicker calculations, generally, Brom’s method or p-y non-linear analysis are adopted by local geo-engineers for lateral load analysis of piles. With advancement in computing capabilities, geotechnical engineers also adopt numerical analyses. As part of this study, various methods adopted were evaluated in terms of their advantages, limitations, and accuracy in predicting the lateral load behavior of piles. Commonly adopted methodologies like Brom’s method were found to have limitations that underestimate pile capacities resulting in overdesign of pile sizes leading to higher costs, whereas comparatively, numerical approaches predicts more accurately the lateral load behavior of piles.","PeriodicalId":44054,"journal":{"name":"Geotechnical Research","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Empirical and numerical study of the static lateral response of socketed pile in Dubai sedimentary rock\",\"authors\":\"O. Mughieda, A. Alzo’ubi, Marwan Alzaylaie, Ramesh Vandanapu, Akash Sharma\",\"doi\":\"10.1680/jgere.22.00032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In geotechnical engineering practice, it is often a challenging task to select suitable method for calculation of lateral load capacity of piles. In Dubai (United Arab Emirates), predominantly piles are rock socketed with top layers commonly medium dense to dense sand or Dubai sedimentary rock contributing to bearing lateral loads. In present study, two lateral load field test results on piles were selected and used for evaluating various methods adopted by local geotechnical engineers. The ground lithology for piles selected constitutes medium dense to dense sand for top layers, which is critical in evaluation of lateral capacity of piles. Due to simpler input requirements and quicker calculations, generally, Brom’s method or p-y non-linear analysis are adopted by local geo-engineers for lateral load analysis of piles. With advancement in computing capabilities, geotechnical engineers also adopt numerical analyses. As part of this study, various methods adopted were evaluated in terms of their advantages, limitations, and accuracy in predicting the lateral load behavior of piles. Commonly adopted methodologies like Brom’s method were found to have limitations that underestimate pile capacities resulting in overdesign of pile sizes leading to higher costs, whereas comparatively, numerical approaches predicts more accurately the lateral load behavior of piles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44054,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geotechnical Research\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-08-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geotechnical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1680/jgere.22.00032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geotechnical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1680/jgere.22.00032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Empirical and numerical study of the static lateral response of socketed pile in Dubai sedimentary rock
In geotechnical engineering practice, it is often a challenging task to select suitable method for calculation of lateral load capacity of piles. In Dubai (United Arab Emirates), predominantly piles are rock socketed with top layers commonly medium dense to dense sand or Dubai sedimentary rock contributing to bearing lateral loads. In present study, two lateral load field test results on piles were selected and used for evaluating various methods adopted by local geotechnical engineers. The ground lithology for piles selected constitutes medium dense to dense sand for top layers, which is critical in evaluation of lateral capacity of piles. Due to simpler input requirements and quicker calculations, generally, Brom’s method or p-y non-linear analysis are adopted by local geo-engineers for lateral load analysis of piles. With advancement in computing capabilities, geotechnical engineers also adopt numerical analyses. As part of this study, various methods adopted were evaluated in terms of their advantages, limitations, and accuracy in predicting the lateral load behavior of piles. Commonly adopted methodologies like Brom’s method were found to have limitations that underestimate pile capacities resulting in overdesign of pile sizes leading to higher costs, whereas comparatively, numerical approaches predicts more accurately the lateral load behavior of piles.
期刊介绍:
Geotechnical Research covers the full scope of geotechnics and its related disciplines including: Soil, rock and fluid mechanics; geoenvironmental engineering; geothermal engineering; geotechnical design and construction issues; analytical and numerical methods; physical modelling; micromechanics; transportation geotechnics; engineering geology; environmental geotechnology; geochemistry; geohydrology and water management.