金融监管的脆弱性:以中小企业为例

Q2 Social Sciences
A. Keller
{"title":"金融监管的脆弱性:以中小企业为例","authors":"A. Keller","doi":"10.54648/eulr2022031","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SMEs are the driving force of economies. For many years, this supported, somewhat ironically, the neglect in designing a coherent regulatory framework to ensure their fair treatment. But the reality is that many SMEs face information asymmetries, lack resources and negotiation power and in the absence of regulatory protection are exposed to harm. In recent years, mounting ad-hoc, eclectic responses have mushroomed to address various aspects of appropriate conduct standards, dispute resolution and accountability. While these mechanisms allow for adaptability and dynamism, they may prove to be inadequate to achieve the FCA’s consumer protection objectives. This article proposes to broaden the application of vulnerability, which was initially designed with natural persons in mind, to guide the fair treatment of SMEs. It argues that expanding the application of vulnerability to SMEs would reflect the hybrid nature of this business model which is often akin to that of individual consumers.\nConduct of business, Vulnerability, SMEs, FCA perimeter, Regulated activities, Commercial lending, Industry codes of conduct, Senior Managers and Certification Regime, Dispute resolution and redress, The Financial Markets Test Case Scheme, Business Lending Standards","PeriodicalId":53431,"journal":{"name":"European Business Law Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Vulnerability in Financial Regulation: The Case of SMEs\",\"authors\":\"A. Keller\",\"doi\":\"10.54648/eulr2022031\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SMEs are the driving force of economies. For many years, this supported, somewhat ironically, the neglect in designing a coherent regulatory framework to ensure their fair treatment. But the reality is that many SMEs face information asymmetries, lack resources and negotiation power and in the absence of regulatory protection are exposed to harm. In recent years, mounting ad-hoc, eclectic responses have mushroomed to address various aspects of appropriate conduct standards, dispute resolution and accountability. While these mechanisms allow for adaptability and dynamism, they may prove to be inadequate to achieve the FCA’s consumer protection objectives. This article proposes to broaden the application of vulnerability, which was initially designed with natural persons in mind, to guide the fair treatment of SMEs. It argues that expanding the application of vulnerability to SMEs would reflect the hybrid nature of this business model which is often akin to that of individual consumers.\\nConduct of business, Vulnerability, SMEs, FCA perimeter, Regulated activities, Commercial lending, Industry codes of conduct, Senior Managers and Certification Regime, Dispute resolution and redress, The Financial Markets Test Case Scheme, Business Lending Standards\",\"PeriodicalId\":53431,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Business Law Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Business Law Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2022031\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Business Law Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.54648/eulr2022031","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

中小企业是经济的推动力。多年来,具有讽刺意味的是,这支持了在设计一个连贯的监管框架以确保公平对待他们方面的忽视。但现实情况是,许多中小企业面临信息不对称,缺乏资源和谈判能力,在缺乏监管保护的情况下面临伤害。近年来,越来越多的临时、折衷的应对措施如雨后春笋般涌现,以解决适当行为标准、争端解决和问责制的各个方面。虽然这些机制具有适应性和活力,但可能不足以实现FCA的消费者保护目标。该条建议扩大脆弱性的适用范围,以指导公平对待中小企业。脆弱性最初是考虑到自然人而设计的。它认为,将脆弱性的适用范围扩大到中小企业将反映出这种商业模式的混合性质,这种商业模式往往类似于个人消费者的商业模式。商业行为、脆弱性、中小企业、FCA周边、受监管活动、商业贷款、行业行为准则、高级管理人员和认证制度、争议解决和补救、金融市场测试案例计划、商业贷款标准
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Vulnerability in Financial Regulation: The Case of SMEs
SMEs are the driving force of economies. For many years, this supported, somewhat ironically, the neglect in designing a coherent regulatory framework to ensure their fair treatment. But the reality is that many SMEs face information asymmetries, lack resources and negotiation power and in the absence of regulatory protection are exposed to harm. In recent years, mounting ad-hoc, eclectic responses have mushroomed to address various aspects of appropriate conduct standards, dispute resolution and accountability. While these mechanisms allow for adaptability and dynamism, they may prove to be inadequate to achieve the FCA’s consumer protection objectives. This article proposes to broaden the application of vulnerability, which was initially designed with natural persons in mind, to guide the fair treatment of SMEs. It argues that expanding the application of vulnerability to SMEs would reflect the hybrid nature of this business model which is often akin to that of individual consumers. Conduct of business, Vulnerability, SMEs, FCA perimeter, Regulated activities, Commercial lending, Industry codes of conduct, Senior Managers and Certification Regime, Dispute resolution and redress, The Financial Markets Test Case Scheme, Business Lending Standards
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Business Law Review
European Business Law Review Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
34
期刊介绍: The mission of the European Business Law Review is to provide a forum for analysis and discussion of business law, including European Union law and the laws of the Member States and other European countries, as well as legal frameworks and issues in international and comparative contexts. The Review moves freely over the boundaries that divide the law, and covers business law, broadly defined, in public or private law, domestic, European or international law. Our topics of interest include commercial, financial, corporate, private and regulatory laws with a broadly business dimension. The Review offers current, authoritative scholarship on a wide range of issues and developments, featuring contributors providing an international as well as a European perspective. The Review is an invaluable source of current scholarship, information, practical analysis, and expert guidance for all practising lawyers, advisers, and scholars dealing with European business law on a regular basis. The Review has over 25 years established the highest scholarly standards. It distinguishes itself as open-minded, embracing interests that appeal to the scholarly, practitioner and policy-making spheres. It practices strict routines of peer review. The Review imposes no word limit on submissions, subject to the appropriateness of the word length to the subject under discussion.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信