古代晚期的裁决:文献证据视野中的演变与认识

IF 0.1 Q3 HISTORY
Luisa Andriollo
{"title":"古代晚期的裁决:文献证据视野中的演变与认识","authors":"Luisa Andriollo","doi":"10.14201/shha202038245272","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper explores the functions of recorded proceedings in late antique court administration, focusing on documentary records related to imperial adjudication. Verbatim records of verdicts uttered by the emperor on individual cases are on the whole scarcely attested; they become particularly rare from the mid-3rd century AD, and are no longer preserved after the 4th century. The author scrutinizes the causes and meaning of such a state of evidence. After an in-depth analysis of the extracts of proceedings included in the Theodosian and Justinian codes, parallel literary and non-literary sources on imperial jurisdiction in the 4th and 5th centuries are considered. The discussion highlights changes occurred in the function, circulation and reception of minuted records. These reflect evolutions which affected not only judicial procedure, but also the understanding of the imperial role, the forms of institutional communication, and late antique legal thinking.","PeriodicalId":40819,"journal":{"name":"Studia Historica-Historia Antigua","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Imperial Adjudication in Late Antiquity: Evolutions and Perceptions in the Light of Documentary Evidence\",\"authors\":\"Luisa Andriollo\",\"doi\":\"10.14201/shha202038245272\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper explores the functions of recorded proceedings in late antique court administration, focusing on documentary records related to imperial adjudication. Verbatim records of verdicts uttered by the emperor on individual cases are on the whole scarcely attested; they become particularly rare from the mid-3rd century AD, and are no longer preserved after the 4th century. The author scrutinizes the causes and meaning of such a state of evidence. After an in-depth analysis of the extracts of proceedings included in the Theodosian and Justinian codes, parallel literary and non-literary sources on imperial jurisdiction in the 4th and 5th centuries are considered. The discussion highlights changes occurred in the function, circulation and reception of minuted records. These reflect evolutions which affected not only judicial procedure, but also the understanding of the imperial role, the forms of institutional communication, and late antique legal thinking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":40819,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Historica-Historia Antigua\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-10-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Historica-Historia Antigua\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.14201/shha202038245272\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Historica-Historia Antigua","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14201/shha202038245272","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以与朝廷裁判有关的文书记录为研究对象,探讨了文书诉讼在古代后期朝廷管理中的作用。皇帝对个别案件所作判决的逐字记录基本上没有得到证实;它们从公元3世纪中期开始变得特别罕见,4世纪后不再保存。作者仔细研究了这种证据状态的原因和意义。在深入分析狄奥多西法典和查士丁尼法典中的诉讼摘要后,考虑了4世纪和5世纪关于帝国管辖权的平行文学和非文学来源。讨论强调了会议记录的功能、分发和接收方面发生的变化。这些变化不仅影响了司法程序,也影响了对帝国角色的理解、制度沟通的形式和晚期古代法律思想。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Imperial Adjudication in Late Antiquity: Evolutions and Perceptions in the Light of Documentary Evidence
This paper explores the functions of recorded proceedings in late antique court administration, focusing on documentary records related to imperial adjudication. Verbatim records of verdicts uttered by the emperor on individual cases are on the whole scarcely attested; they become particularly rare from the mid-3rd century AD, and are no longer preserved after the 4th century. The author scrutinizes the causes and meaning of such a state of evidence. After an in-depth analysis of the extracts of proceedings included in the Theodosian and Justinian codes, parallel literary and non-literary sources on imperial jurisdiction in the 4th and 5th centuries are considered. The discussion highlights changes occurred in the function, circulation and reception of minuted records. These reflect evolutions which affected not only judicial procedure, but also the understanding of the imperial role, the forms of institutional communication, and late antique legal thinking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
期刊介绍: STUDIA HISTORICA: HISTORIA ANTIGUA is an annual journal in which the articles received will be evaluated by reviewers external to the journal through the double blind system. The Editorial Board, respectful of the intellectual freedom of the authors, will not modify the opinions and expressed by them, although it does not sympathize with them either. The Editorial Board of STUDIA HISTORICA: HISTORIA ANTIGUA will consider the publication of works of all kinds, provided that they demonstrate a high level of quality and deal with aspects related to the chronological period included within the scope of Ancient History, either because of the novelty of the subject, because of the different treatment more deep of a problem already identified in historiography, by the contribution of unknown data in relation to a determined historiographic question, or by the potential applications of a new or more refined methodology.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信