业务流程管理系统(BPMS)评估:Bizagi和Bonita软件分析

IF 0.3 Q4 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
Wagner Araújo, Tamara Aureliano Gomes
{"title":"业务流程管理系统(BPMS)评估:Bizagi和Bonita软件分析","authors":"Wagner Araújo, Tamara Aureliano Gomes","doi":"10.20396/rdbci.v20i00.8670814/30329","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction: This article presents the results of a research work that evaluated the operation of the BPMS Bizagi and Bonita, used to manage the process of hiring access services to digital books databases, conducted by the Central Library of the Federal University of Paraíba. Objective: The article had as goal to analyze and compare two softwares used for mapping the informational flow in business processes -the Business Process Management Systems (BPMS) Bizagi and Bonita. Methodology: The softwares were used for mapping and analyzing the process flow of contracting services for access to digital book databases, conducted by the Central Library of the Federal University of Paraíba. They were evaluated based on the recommendations of the Analytic Hierarchy Process AHP, considering seven criteria: license type, simulation tool, user support, usability, languages, training and documentation. The methodology adopted in this article is classified as descriptive, with a mixed quanti/qualitative approach. Results: As a result, it was possible to evaluate and verify, through the techniques of AHP, the functioning of Bizagi and Bonita as tools for mapping the information flow in the presented business process, observing their performances. Conclusion:At the end of the research, it was concluded that Bizagi was the most appropriate BPMS for the selected criteria.","PeriodicalId":36988,"journal":{"name":"Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciencia da Informacao","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Evaluation of business process management systems (BPMS): analysis of Bizagi and Bonita softwares\",\"authors\":\"Wagner Araújo, Tamara Aureliano Gomes\",\"doi\":\"10.20396/rdbci.v20i00.8670814/30329\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction: This article presents the results of a research work that evaluated the operation of the BPMS Bizagi and Bonita, used to manage the process of hiring access services to digital books databases, conducted by the Central Library of the Federal University of Paraíba. Objective: The article had as goal to analyze and compare two softwares used for mapping the informational flow in business processes -the Business Process Management Systems (BPMS) Bizagi and Bonita. Methodology: The softwares were used for mapping and analyzing the process flow of contracting services for access to digital book databases, conducted by the Central Library of the Federal University of Paraíba. They were evaluated based on the recommendations of the Analytic Hierarchy Process AHP, considering seven criteria: license type, simulation tool, user support, usability, languages, training and documentation. The methodology adopted in this article is classified as descriptive, with a mixed quanti/qualitative approach. Results: As a result, it was possible to evaluate and verify, through the techniques of AHP, the functioning of Bizagi and Bonita as tools for mapping the information flow in the presented business process, observing their performances. Conclusion:At the end of the research, it was concluded that Bizagi was the most appropriate BPMS for the selected criteria.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36988,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciencia da Informacao\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-01-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciencia da Informacao\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.20396/rdbci.v20i00.8670814/30329\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciencia da Informacao","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20396/rdbci.v20i00.8670814/30329","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

简介:本文介绍了一项研究工作的结果,该研究评估了BPMS Bizagi和Bonita的运行情况,该系统用于管理电子图书数据库的招聘访问服务过程,由Paraíba联邦大学中央图书馆进行。目的:本文的目标是分析和比较用于映射业务流程中的信息流的两种软件——业务流程管理系统Bizagi和Bonita。方法:该软件用于绘制和分析由Paraíba联邦大学中央图书馆进行的数字图书数据库访问承包服务的流程。根据层次分析法AHP的建议对它们进行评估,考虑了七个标准:许可证类型、模拟工具、用户支持、可用性、语言、培训和文档。本文采用的方法被归类为描述性方法,采用混合的定量/定性方法。结果:因此,通过AHP技术,可以评估和验证Bizagi和Bonita作为映射所呈现业务流程中的信息流的工具的功能,并观察它们的性能。结论:在研究结束时,得出Bizagi是所选标准中最合适的BPMS。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Evaluation of business process management systems (BPMS): analysis of Bizagi and Bonita softwares
Introduction: This article presents the results of a research work that evaluated the operation of the BPMS Bizagi and Bonita, used to manage the process of hiring access services to digital books databases, conducted by the Central Library of the Federal University of Paraíba. Objective: The article had as goal to analyze and compare two softwares used for mapping the informational flow in business processes -the Business Process Management Systems (BPMS) Bizagi and Bonita. Methodology: The softwares were used for mapping and analyzing the process flow of contracting services for access to digital book databases, conducted by the Central Library of the Federal University of Paraíba. They were evaluated based on the recommendations of the Analytic Hierarchy Process AHP, considering seven criteria: license type, simulation tool, user support, usability, languages, training and documentation. The methodology adopted in this article is classified as descriptive, with a mixed quanti/qualitative approach. Results: As a result, it was possible to evaluate and verify, through the techniques of AHP, the functioning of Bizagi and Bonita as tools for mapping the information flow in the presented business process, observing their performances. Conclusion:At the end of the research, it was concluded that Bizagi was the most appropriate BPMS for the selected criteria.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciencia da Informacao
Revista Digital de Biblioteconomia e Ciencia da Informacao Social Sciences-Library and Information Sciences
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
24 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信