研究人员和从业人员在制定设施管理标准和指南方面的合作

IF 1.6 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Facilities Pub Date : 2023-01-19 DOI:10.1108/f-06-2022-0091
P. Jensen, S. B. Nielsen, H. L. Rasmussen
{"title":"研究人员和从业人员在制定设施管理标准和指南方面的合作","authors":"P. Jensen, S. B. Nielsen, H. L. Rasmussen","doi":"10.1108/f-06-2022-0091","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the collaboration between researchers and practitioners on developing standards and guidelines for Facilities Management (FM).\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nThis paper is based on a longitudinal case study on research on FM value adding and its impact on FM standardization and development of a FM Value Guide. The sources used are literature and documents on FM value adding and standardization, published and planned FM standards, the FM Value Guide, internal documents and participant observations and experiences. All authors of this paper have both research and practical background. Two of them have been – and one still is – actively involved in developing European and international FM standards, and all three have been involved in developing the FM Value Guide. The research methodology can be characterized as retrospective action research.\n\n\nFindings\nThe literature review shows that even though there are many references to standards in research papers, particularly in relation to definitions of concepts, there are only few studies on how research influences standardization and how researchers collaborate with practitioners on developing standards and guidelines. This paper presents a case study showing how research can contribute to standardization and development of guidelines in collaboration with practitioners and makes suggestions on how such collaboration can be improved.\n\n\nPractical implications\nThe results of this paper provide understanding and inspiration for how researchers and practitioners can collaborate in the development of standards and guidelines.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper is the first study on collaboration between researchers and practitioners on developing FM standards and guidelines.\n","PeriodicalId":47595,"journal":{"name":"Facilities","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Collaboration between researchers and practitioners on developing facilities management standards and guidelines\",\"authors\":\"P. Jensen, S. B. Nielsen, H. L. Rasmussen\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/f-06-2022-0091\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nThe purpose of this paper is to investigate the collaboration between researchers and practitioners on developing standards and guidelines for Facilities Management (FM).\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nThis paper is based on a longitudinal case study on research on FM value adding and its impact on FM standardization and development of a FM Value Guide. The sources used are literature and documents on FM value adding and standardization, published and planned FM standards, the FM Value Guide, internal documents and participant observations and experiences. All authors of this paper have both research and practical background. Two of them have been – and one still is – actively involved in developing European and international FM standards, and all three have been involved in developing the FM Value Guide. The research methodology can be characterized as retrospective action research.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nThe literature review shows that even though there are many references to standards in research papers, particularly in relation to definitions of concepts, there are only few studies on how research influences standardization and how researchers collaborate with practitioners on developing standards and guidelines. This paper presents a case study showing how research can contribute to standardization and development of guidelines in collaboration with practitioners and makes suggestions on how such collaboration can be improved.\\n\\n\\nPractical implications\\nThe results of this paper provide understanding and inspiration for how researchers and practitioners can collaborate in the development of standards and guidelines.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nTo the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper is the first study on collaboration between researchers and practitioners on developing FM standards and guidelines.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":47595,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Facilities\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Facilities\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/f-06-2022-0091\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Facilities","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/f-06-2022-0091","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

目的本文旨在调查研究人员和从业者在制定设施管理标准和指南方面的合作。设计/方法论/方法本文基于对设施管理增值研究及其对设施管理标准化和制定设施管理价值指南的影响的纵向案例研究。所使用的来源是关于FM增值和标准化的文献和文件、已发布和计划的FM标准、FM价值指南、内部文件以及参与者的意见和经验。本文作者既有研究背景,又有实践背景。他们中的两个一直——现在仍然——积极参与制定欧洲和国际FM标准,三个都参与了FM价值指南的制定。研究方法可以被描述为回顾性行动研究。发现文献综述表明,尽管研究论文中引用了许多标准,特别是与概念定义有关的标准,但关于研究如何影响标准化以及研究人员如何与从业者合作制定标准和指南的研究却很少。本文介绍了一个案例研究,展示了研究如何与从业者合作,为指南的标准化和制定做出贡献,并就如何改进这种合作提出了建议。实践意义本文的结果为研究人员和从业者如何在标准和指南的制定中进行合作提供了理解和启发。原创性/价值据作者所知,这篇论文是研究人员和从业者在制定FM标准和指南方面合作的首次研究。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Collaboration between researchers and practitioners on developing facilities management standards and guidelines
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to investigate the collaboration between researchers and practitioners on developing standards and guidelines for Facilities Management (FM). Design/methodology/approach This paper is based on a longitudinal case study on research on FM value adding and its impact on FM standardization and development of a FM Value Guide. The sources used are literature and documents on FM value adding and standardization, published and planned FM standards, the FM Value Guide, internal documents and participant observations and experiences. All authors of this paper have both research and practical background. Two of them have been – and one still is – actively involved in developing European and international FM standards, and all three have been involved in developing the FM Value Guide. The research methodology can be characterized as retrospective action research. Findings The literature review shows that even though there are many references to standards in research papers, particularly in relation to definitions of concepts, there are only few studies on how research influences standardization and how researchers collaborate with practitioners on developing standards and guidelines. This paper presents a case study showing how research can contribute to standardization and development of guidelines in collaboration with practitioners and makes suggestions on how such collaboration can be improved. Practical implications The results of this paper provide understanding and inspiration for how researchers and practitioners can collaborate in the development of standards and guidelines. Originality/value To the best of the authors’ knowledge, this paper is the first study on collaboration between researchers and practitioners on developing FM standards and guidelines.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Facilities
Facilities MANAGEMENT-
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
17.40%
发文量
46
期刊介绍: The journal offers thorough, independent and expert papers to inform relevant audiences of thinking and practice in the field, including topics such as: ■Intelligent buildings ■Post-occupancy evaluation (building evaluation) ■Relocation and change management ■Sick building syndrome ■Ergonomics and workplace design ■Environmental and workplace psychology ■Briefing, design and construction ■Energy consumption ■Quality initiatives ■Infrastructure management
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信