全系统质量改进举措对血压控制的影响:队列分析

E. Pfoh, Kathryn A. Martinez, Nirav Vakharia, M. Rothberg
{"title":"全系统质量改进举措对血压控制的影响:队列分析","authors":"E. Pfoh, Kathryn A. Martinez, Nirav Vakharia, M. Rothberg","doi":"10.1136/bmjqs-2018-009032","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective To assess the impact of a quality improvement programme on blood pressure (BP) control and determine whether medication intensification or repeated measurement improved control. Design Retrospective cohort comparing visits in 2015 to visits in 2016 (when the programme started). Subjects Adults with ≥1 primary care visit between January and June in 2015 and 2016 and a diagnosis of hypertension in a large integrated health system. Measures Elevated BP was defined as a BP ≥140/90 mm Hg. Physician response was defined as: nothing; BP recheck within 30 days; or medication intensification within 30 days. Our outcome was BP control (<140/90 mm Hg) at the last visit of the year. We used a multilevel logistic regression model (adjusted for demographic and clinical variables) to identify the effect of the programme on the odds of BP control. Results Our cohort included 111 867 adults. Control increased from 72% in 2015 to 79% in 2016 (p<0.01). The average percentage of visits with elevated blood pressure was 31% in 2015 and 25% in 2016 (p<0.01). During visits with an elevated BP, physicians were more likely to intensify medication in 2016 than in 2015 (43% vs 40%, p<0.01) and slightly more likely to obtain a BP recheck (15% vs 14%, p<0.01). Among patients with ≥1 elevated BP who attained control by the last visit in the year, there was 6% increase from 2015 to 2016 in the percentage of patients who received at least one medication intensification during the year and a 1% increase in BP rechecks. The adjusted odds of the last BP reading being categorised as controlled was 59% higher in 2016 than in 2015 (95% CI 1.54 to 1.64). Conclusion A system-wide initiative can improve BP control, primarily through medication intensification.","PeriodicalId":49653,"journal":{"name":"Quality & Safety in Health Care","volume":"29 1","pages":"225 - 231"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-08-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjqs-2018-009032","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Impact of a system-wide quality improvement initiative on blood pressure control: a cohort analysis\",\"authors\":\"E. Pfoh, Kathryn A. Martinez, Nirav Vakharia, M. Rothberg\",\"doi\":\"10.1136/bmjqs-2018-009032\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objective To assess the impact of a quality improvement programme on blood pressure (BP) control and determine whether medication intensification or repeated measurement improved control. Design Retrospective cohort comparing visits in 2015 to visits in 2016 (when the programme started). Subjects Adults with ≥1 primary care visit between January and June in 2015 and 2016 and a diagnosis of hypertension in a large integrated health system. Measures Elevated BP was defined as a BP ≥140/90 mm Hg. Physician response was defined as: nothing; BP recheck within 30 days; or medication intensification within 30 days. Our outcome was BP control (<140/90 mm Hg) at the last visit of the year. We used a multilevel logistic regression model (adjusted for demographic and clinical variables) to identify the effect of the programme on the odds of BP control. Results Our cohort included 111 867 adults. Control increased from 72% in 2015 to 79% in 2016 (p<0.01). The average percentage of visits with elevated blood pressure was 31% in 2015 and 25% in 2016 (p<0.01). During visits with an elevated BP, physicians were more likely to intensify medication in 2016 than in 2015 (43% vs 40%, p<0.01) and slightly more likely to obtain a BP recheck (15% vs 14%, p<0.01). Among patients with ≥1 elevated BP who attained control by the last visit in the year, there was 6% increase from 2015 to 2016 in the percentage of patients who received at least one medication intensification during the year and a 1% increase in BP rechecks. The adjusted odds of the last BP reading being categorised as controlled was 59% higher in 2016 than in 2015 (95% CI 1.54 to 1.64). Conclusion A system-wide initiative can improve BP control, primarily through medication intensification.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49653,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Quality & Safety in Health Care\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"225 - 231\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-08-31\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1136/bmjqs-2018-009032\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Quality & Safety in Health Care\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2018-009032\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Quality & Safety in Health Care","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1136/bmjqs-2018-009032","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

目的评估质量改进计划对血压(BP)控制的影响,并确定药物强化或重复测量是否改善了控制。设计回顾性队列,将2015年的访视与2016年(项目开始时)的访视进行比较。受试者在2015年至2016年1月至6月期间,在大型综合卫生系统中,有≥1次初级保健就诊并被诊断为高血压的成年人。测量血压升高被定义为血压≥140/90毫米汞柱。医生的反应被定义为:没有;BP在30天内复查;或在30天内加强药物治疗。我们的结果是BP控制(<140/90 毫米汞柱)。我们使用多水平逻辑回归模型(根据人口统计学和临床变量进行调整)来确定该计划对血压控制几率的影响。结果我们的队列包括111 867名成年人。对照组从2015年的72%增加到2016年的79%(p<0.01)。血压升高就诊的平均百分比分别为2015年的31%和2016年的25%(p<0.01)。在血压升高就诊期间,与2015年相比,医生在2016年更有可能加强药物治疗(43%对40%,p<0.01),并且获得血压复查的可能性略高(15%对14%,p<0.01)。在一年中最后一次就诊时获得控制的血压≥1升高的患者中,从2015年到2016年,在这一年中至少接受一次药物强化治疗的患者比例增加了6%,血压复查增加了1%。2016年,最后一次血压读数被归类为受控的调整后几率比2015年高59%(95%CI 1.54至1.64)。结论全系统的举措可以改善血压控制,主要是通过加强药物治疗。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Impact of a system-wide quality improvement initiative on blood pressure control: a cohort analysis
Objective To assess the impact of a quality improvement programme on blood pressure (BP) control and determine whether medication intensification or repeated measurement improved control. Design Retrospective cohort comparing visits in 2015 to visits in 2016 (when the programme started). Subjects Adults with ≥1 primary care visit between January and June in 2015 and 2016 and a diagnosis of hypertension in a large integrated health system. Measures Elevated BP was defined as a BP ≥140/90 mm Hg. Physician response was defined as: nothing; BP recheck within 30 days; or medication intensification within 30 days. Our outcome was BP control (<140/90 mm Hg) at the last visit of the year. We used a multilevel logistic regression model (adjusted for demographic and clinical variables) to identify the effect of the programme on the odds of BP control. Results Our cohort included 111 867 adults. Control increased from 72% in 2015 to 79% in 2016 (p<0.01). The average percentage of visits with elevated blood pressure was 31% in 2015 and 25% in 2016 (p<0.01). During visits with an elevated BP, physicians were more likely to intensify medication in 2016 than in 2015 (43% vs 40%, p<0.01) and slightly more likely to obtain a BP recheck (15% vs 14%, p<0.01). Among patients with ≥1 elevated BP who attained control by the last visit in the year, there was 6% increase from 2015 to 2016 in the percentage of patients who received at least one medication intensification during the year and a 1% increase in BP rechecks. The adjusted odds of the last BP reading being categorised as controlled was 59% higher in 2016 than in 2015 (95% CI 1.54 to 1.64). Conclusion A system-wide initiative can improve BP control, primarily through medication intensification.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Quality & Safety in Health Care
Quality & Safety in Health Care 医学-卫生保健
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
>12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信