《庄子》中的美与当代美的理论

IF 0.7 4区 社会学 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY
P. Feng
{"title":"《庄子》中的美与当代美的理论","authors":"P. Feng","doi":"10.5406/jaesteduc.54.2.0021","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:In this article, I outline a reading of Mei in the Zhuangzi, taken to mean \"beauty\" or \"the beautiful.\" There is a possible anachronism involved in such an approach because mei is not central to Zhuangzi's thinking. Nonetheless, I will argue that interesting points of relevance between Zhuangzi's comments on mei and contemporary theories of beauty can be found and that an intercultural interpretation of mei and the beautiful can shed light on aspects of both traditional Chinese aesthetics and contemporary Western aesthetics by placing the two in conversation with one another. Zhuangzi seems to support neither relativism nor universalism in his understanding of beauty, though he touches on both relativist and universalist ideas. I argue there are certain superficial similarities between Zhuangzi's aesthetics and positive aesthetics. But, on a deeper level, Zhuangzi advocates a form of negative aesthetics that is not dissimilar from those already prominent in contemporary Continental aesthetics, such as Christoph Menke, Gernot Böhme, and François Jullien. In this way, I highlight points for dialogue between Zhuangzi's theory of beauty and contemporary discourse, as well as the ramifications of these ideas for thinking about the future of aesthetic education.","PeriodicalId":45866,"journal":{"name":"JOURNAL OF AESTHETIC EDUCATION","volume":"54 1","pages":"21 - 38"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2020-04-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Beauty (Mei, 美) in the Zhuangzi and Contemporary Theories of Beauty\",\"authors\":\"P. Feng\",\"doi\":\"10.5406/jaesteduc.54.2.0021\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:In this article, I outline a reading of Mei in the Zhuangzi, taken to mean \\\"beauty\\\" or \\\"the beautiful.\\\" There is a possible anachronism involved in such an approach because mei is not central to Zhuangzi's thinking. Nonetheless, I will argue that interesting points of relevance between Zhuangzi's comments on mei and contemporary theories of beauty can be found and that an intercultural interpretation of mei and the beautiful can shed light on aspects of both traditional Chinese aesthetics and contemporary Western aesthetics by placing the two in conversation with one another. Zhuangzi seems to support neither relativism nor universalism in his understanding of beauty, though he touches on both relativist and universalist ideas. I argue there are certain superficial similarities between Zhuangzi's aesthetics and positive aesthetics. But, on a deeper level, Zhuangzi advocates a form of negative aesthetics that is not dissimilar from those already prominent in contemporary Continental aesthetics, such as Christoph Menke, Gernot Böhme, and François Jullien. In this way, I highlight points for dialogue between Zhuangzi's theory of beauty and contemporary discourse, as well as the ramifications of these ideas for thinking about the future of aesthetic education.\",\"PeriodicalId\":45866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"JOURNAL OF AESTHETIC EDUCATION\",\"volume\":\"54 1\",\"pages\":\"21 - 38\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-04-22\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"JOURNAL OF AESTHETIC EDUCATION\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1092\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5406/jaesteduc.54.2.0021\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"JOURNAL OF AESTHETIC EDUCATION","FirstCategoryId":"1092","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5406/jaesteduc.54.2.0021","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要:在这篇文章中,我概述了对《庄子》中梅的解读,梅的意思是“美”或“美”。这种解读可能有时代错误,因为梅不是庄子思想的核心。尽管如此,我认为庄子对美的评论与当代美理论之间可以找到有趣的关联点,对美和美的跨文化解读可以通过将两者置于对话中来揭示中国传统美学和当代西方美学的各个方面。庄子在对美的理解上似乎既不支持相对主义,也不支持普遍主义,尽管他同时涉及相对主义和普遍主义的思想。笔者认为,庄子美学与积极美学之间存在着一些表面上的相似之处。但是,在更深层次上,庄子提倡一种消极美学形式,这种形式与当代大陆美学中已经很突出的美学形式没有什么不同,比如克里斯托夫·门克、格诺特·博姆和弗朗索瓦·朱利安。通过这种方式,我强调了庄子的美理论与当代话语之间的对话要点,以及这些思想对思考美育未来的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Beauty (Mei, 美) in the Zhuangzi and Contemporary Theories of Beauty
Abstract:In this article, I outline a reading of Mei in the Zhuangzi, taken to mean "beauty" or "the beautiful." There is a possible anachronism involved in such an approach because mei is not central to Zhuangzi's thinking. Nonetheless, I will argue that interesting points of relevance between Zhuangzi's comments on mei and contemporary theories of beauty can be found and that an intercultural interpretation of mei and the beautiful can shed light on aspects of both traditional Chinese aesthetics and contemporary Western aesthetics by placing the two in conversation with one another. Zhuangzi seems to support neither relativism nor universalism in his understanding of beauty, though he touches on both relativist and universalist ideas. I argue there are certain superficial similarities between Zhuangzi's aesthetics and positive aesthetics. But, on a deeper level, Zhuangzi advocates a form of negative aesthetics that is not dissimilar from those already prominent in contemporary Continental aesthetics, such as Christoph Menke, Gernot Böhme, and François Jullien. In this way, I highlight points for dialogue between Zhuangzi's theory of beauty and contemporary discourse, as well as the ramifications of these ideas for thinking about the future of aesthetic education.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
JOURNAL OF AESTHETIC EDUCATION
JOURNAL OF AESTHETIC EDUCATION HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Aesthetic Education (JAE) is a highly respected interdisciplinary journal that focuses on clarifying the issues of aesthetic education understood in its most extensive meaning. The journal thus welcomes articles on philosophical aesthetics and education, to problem areas in education critical to arts and humanities at all institutional levels; to an understanding of the aesthetic import of the new communications media and environmental aesthetics; and to an understanding of the aesthetic character of humanistic disciplines. The journal is a valuable resource not only to educators, but also to philosophers, art critics and art historians.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信