民族生物学第六阶段:非殖民化机构、项目和奖学金

IF 2.9 3区 社会学 Q1 ANTHROPOLOGY
A. McAlvay, C. Armstrong, J. Baker, Linda Black Elk, Samantha Bosco, N. Hanazaki, Leigh Joseph, T. Martínez-Cruz, M. Nesbitt, M. A. Palmer, Walderes Cocta Priprá de Almeida, Jane Anderson, Zemede Asfaw Z. Asfaw, I. Borokini, Eréndira Juanita Cano-Contreras, Simon Hoyte, M. Hudson, A. Ladio, G. Odonne, Sonia Peter, J. Rashford, Jeffrey Wall, Steve Wolverton, I. Vandebroek
{"title":"民族生物学第六阶段:非殖民化机构、项目和奖学金","authors":"A. McAlvay, C. Armstrong, J. Baker, Linda Black Elk, Samantha Bosco, N. Hanazaki, Leigh Joseph, T. Martínez-Cruz, M. Nesbitt, M. A. Palmer, Walderes Cocta Priprá de Almeida, Jane Anderson, Zemede Asfaw Z. Asfaw, I. Borokini, Eréndira Juanita Cano-Contreras, Simon Hoyte, M. Hudson, A. Ladio, G. Odonne, Sonia Peter, J. Rashford, Jeffrey Wall, Steve Wolverton, I. Vandebroek","doi":"10.2993/0278-0771-41.2.170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract. Ethnobiology, like many fields, was shaped by early Western imperial efforts to colonize people and lands around the world and extract natural resources. Those legacies and practices persist today and continue to influence the institutions ethnobiologists are a part of, how they carry out research, and their personal beliefs and actions. Various authors have previously outlined five overlapping “phases” of ethnobiology. Here, we argue that ethnobiology should move toward a sixth phase in which scholars and practitioners must actively challenge colonialism, racism, and oppressive structures embedded within their institutions, projects, and themselves. As an international group of ethnobiologists and scholars from allied fields, we identified key topics and priorities at three levels: at the institutional scale, we argue for repatriation/rematriation of biocultural heritage, accessibility of published work, and realignment of priorities to support community-driven research. At the level of projects, we emphasize the need for mutual dialogue, reciprocity, community research self-sufficiency, and research questions that support sovereignty of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities over lands and waters. Finally, for individual scholars, we support self-reflection on language use, co-authorship, and implicit bias. We advocate for concrete actions at each of these levels to move the field further toward social justice, antiracism, and decolonization.","PeriodicalId":54838,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Ethnobiology","volume":"41 1","pages":"170 - 191"},"PeriodicalIF":2.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"28","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Ethnobiology Phase VI: Decolonizing Institutions, Projects, and Scholarship\",\"authors\":\"A. McAlvay, C. Armstrong, J. Baker, Linda Black Elk, Samantha Bosco, N. Hanazaki, Leigh Joseph, T. Martínez-Cruz, M. Nesbitt, M. A. Palmer, Walderes Cocta Priprá de Almeida, Jane Anderson, Zemede Asfaw Z. Asfaw, I. Borokini, Eréndira Juanita Cano-Contreras, Simon Hoyte, M. Hudson, A. Ladio, G. Odonne, Sonia Peter, J. Rashford, Jeffrey Wall, Steve Wolverton, I. Vandebroek\",\"doi\":\"10.2993/0278-0771-41.2.170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract. Ethnobiology, like many fields, was shaped by early Western imperial efforts to colonize people and lands around the world and extract natural resources. Those legacies and practices persist today and continue to influence the institutions ethnobiologists are a part of, how they carry out research, and their personal beliefs and actions. Various authors have previously outlined five overlapping “phases” of ethnobiology. Here, we argue that ethnobiology should move toward a sixth phase in which scholars and practitioners must actively challenge colonialism, racism, and oppressive structures embedded within their institutions, projects, and themselves. As an international group of ethnobiologists and scholars from allied fields, we identified key topics and priorities at three levels: at the institutional scale, we argue for repatriation/rematriation of biocultural heritage, accessibility of published work, and realignment of priorities to support community-driven research. At the level of projects, we emphasize the need for mutual dialogue, reciprocity, community research self-sufficiency, and research questions that support sovereignty of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities over lands and waters. Finally, for individual scholars, we support self-reflection on language use, co-authorship, and implicit bias. We advocate for concrete actions at each of these levels to move the field further toward social justice, antiracism, and decolonization.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54838,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Ethnobiology\",\"volume\":\"41 1\",\"pages\":\"170 - 191\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"28\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Ethnobiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-41.2.170\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Ethnobiology","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2993/0278-0771-41.2.170","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 28

摘要

摘要与许多领域一样,民族生物学是由早期西方帝国在世界各地殖民人民和土地并开采自然资源的努力形成的。这些遗产和实践今天依然存在,并继续影响着民族生物学家所属的机构、他们如何进行研究以及他们的个人信仰和行动。不同的作者之前已经概述了民族生物学的五个重叠的“阶段”。在这里,我们认为民族生物学应该进入第六阶段,在这一阶段,学者和从业者必须积极挑战殖民主义、种族主义和嵌入其机构、项目和自身的压迫性结构。作为一个由来自相关领域的民族生物学家和学者组成的国际团体,我们在三个层面上确定了关键主题和优先事项:在机构层面,我们主张遣返/重新遣返生物文化遗产,可获得已发表的作品,以及调整优先事项以支持社区驱动的研究。在项目层面,我们强调需要相互对话、互惠、社区研究自给自足,以及支持土著人民和地方社区对土地和水域主权的研究问题。最后,对于个别学者,我们支持对语言使用、合著和隐性偏见的自我反思。我们主张在每一个层面采取具体行动,使该领域进一步走向社会正义、反种族主义和非殖民化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Ethnobiology Phase VI: Decolonizing Institutions, Projects, and Scholarship
Abstract. Ethnobiology, like many fields, was shaped by early Western imperial efforts to colonize people and lands around the world and extract natural resources. Those legacies and practices persist today and continue to influence the institutions ethnobiologists are a part of, how they carry out research, and their personal beliefs and actions. Various authors have previously outlined five overlapping “phases” of ethnobiology. Here, we argue that ethnobiology should move toward a sixth phase in which scholars and practitioners must actively challenge colonialism, racism, and oppressive structures embedded within their institutions, projects, and themselves. As an international group of ethnobiologists and scholars from allied fields, we identified key topics and priorities at three levels: at the institutional scale, we argue for repatriation/rematriation of biocultural heritage, accessibility of published work, and realignment of priorities to support community-driven research. At the level of projects, we emphasize the need for mutual dialogue, reciprocity, community research self-sufficiency, and research questions that support sovereignty of Indigenous Peoples and Local Communities over lands and waters. Finally, for individual scholars, we support self-reflection on language use, co-authorship, and implicit bias. We advocate for concrete actions at each of these levels to move the field further toward social justice, antiracism, and decolonization.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Ethnobiology
Journal of Ethnobiology Social Sciences-Anthropology
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
3.40%
发文量
21
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: JoE’s readership is as wide and diverse as ethnobiology itself, with readers spanning from both the natural and social sciences. Not surprisingly, a glance at the papers published in the Journal reveals the depth and breadth of topics, extending from studies in archaeology and the origins of agriculture, to folk classification systems, to food composition, plants, birds, mammals, fungi and everything in between. Research areas published in JoE include but are not limited to neo- and paleo-ethnobiology, zooarchaeology, ethnobotany, ethnozoology, ethnopharmacology, ethnoecology, linguistic ethnobiology, human paleoecology, and many other related fields of study within anthropology and biology, such as taxonomy, conservation biology, ethnography, political ecology, and cognitive and cultural anthropology. JoE does not limit itself to a single perspective, approach or discipline, but seeks to represent the full spectrum and wide diversity of the field of ethnobiology, including cognitive, symbolic, linguistic, ecological, and economic aspects of human interactions with our living world. Articles that significantly advance ethnobiological theory and/or methodology are particularly welcome, as well as studies bridging across disciplines and knowledge systems. JoE does not publish uncontextualized data such as species lists; appropriate submissions must elaborate on the ethnobiological context of findings.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信