斯勒曼县sman1ngaglik地理教师开发2013课程学习设备的制约因素

F. Nugroho, H. Hastuti
{"title":"斯勒曼县sman1ngaglik地理教师开发2013课程学习设备的制约因素","authors":"F. Nugroho, H. Hastuti","doi":"10.19184/GEOSI.V4I1.9294","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study aims to determine: (1) the difficulties of geography teachers in SMA N 1 Ngaglik to develop learning media, and (2) how to solve those difficulties. This research was conducted in SMA N 1 Ngaglik. This study used descriptive qualitative method. The subjects in this study were the geography teachers. The data collection techniques used was observation, interviews, and documentation. The data analysis technique in this study used interactive analysis which includes data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. The results of this study indicate: (1) the obstacles found in the school like the teachers develop syllabus using a scientific approach only, they have not carried out all learning models in accordance with Curriculum 2013, the difficulties in developing learning media, the difficulties in developing learning media, and the difficulties in assessing balanced attitudes and skills with knowledge, and (2) to solve those difficulties the teacher carries out various ways by discussing and sharing with other geography teacher, participates in MGMP activities from the school to the district level, attends trainings or workshops to add insight and various information for the improvements in developing learning media. \nKeywords: obstacles, learning media, curriculum 2013 \nReferences \n  \nCheung, A.C.K & Wong, P.M. (2012). “Factors Affecting the Implementation of Curriculum Reform in Hong Kong: Key Findings from a Large‐Scale Survey Study”. International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 26 Iss: 1, pp.39 – 54. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513541- 211194374. \n  \nEraslan, A. (2013). “Teachers’ Reflections on the Implementation of the New Elementary School Mathematics Curriculum in Turkey”. HU Journal of of Education. 28 (2), 152-165. \nMulyasa. E (2014). Pengembangan dan Implementasi kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. \nKankam, B., Bordoh, A., Eshum, I., Bassaw, T.K, & Korang, F.Y. (2014). ”Teachers’ Perception of Authentic Assessment Techniques Practice in Social Studies Lessonsin Senior High Schools in Ghana”. International Journal of Educational Researchand Information Science. 1 (4): 62-68. \nKatuuk, D.A. (2014). Manajemen Implementasi Kurikulum: Strategi Penguatan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 13 (1): 13-26. \nKurebwa, M. & Nyaruwata, L.T. 2013. ”Assessment Challenges in the Primary Schools: A Case of Gweru Urban Schools”. Greener Journal of Educational Research 3(7), pp. 336-344. \nLumadi, M.W. (2013). “Challenges Besetting Teachers in Classroom Assessment: An Exploratory Perspective”. Journal of Social Science. 34 (3): 211-221. \nMayer, V.J. & Fortner, R.W. (1987). “Relative Effectiveness of Four Modes of Dissemination of Curriculum Materials”, TheJournal of Environmental Education, 19(1) 25-30. Doi:10.1080/00958964.1987.- 10801957. \nMenteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 81 Tahun 2013 tentang Pelaksanaan Penilaian. \nMenteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. 2014. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 104 Tahun 2014 tentang Pelaksanaan Penilaian. \nRyder, J., Banner, I., & Homer, M. (2014). “Teachers’ Experiences of Science Curriculum \n       Reform”. School. \nSugiyono. (2007). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandungan: Alfabeta. \nSukardi. (2005). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan Kompetensi dan Praktiknya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. \nSyomwene, A. (2013). “Factors Affecting Teachers’ Implementation of Curriculum Reforms and Educational Policies in Schools: The Kenyan Experience”. Journalof Education and Practice. 4 (22) 80- 86. \nWina Sanjaya. (2010). Perencanaan & Desain Sistem Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana. \nCopyright (c) 2018 Geosfera Indonesia Journal and Department of Geography Education, University of Jember \n This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share A like 4.0 International License","PeriodicalId":33276,"journal":{"name":"Geosfera Indonesia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"CONSTRAINTS OF GEOGRAPHY TEACHER OF SMA N 1 NGAGLIK IN DEVELOPING THE 2013 CURRICULUM LEARNING DEVICES IN SLEMAN REGENCY\",\"authors\":\"F. Nugroho, H. Hastuti\",\"doi\":\"10.19184/GEOSI.V4I1.9294\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study aims to determine: (1) the difficulties of geography teachers in SMA N 1 Ngaglik to develop learning media, and (2) how to solve those difficulties. This research was conducted in SMA N 1 Ngaglik. This study used descriptive qualitative method. The subjects in this study were the geography teachers. The data collection techniques used was observation, interviews, and documentation. The data analysis technique in this study used interactive analysis which includes data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. The results of this study indicate: (1) the obstacles found in the school like the teachers develop syllabus using a scientific approach only, they have not carried out all learning models in accordance with Curriculum 2013, the difficulties in developing learning media, the difficulties in developing learning media, and the difficulties in assessing balanced attitudes and skills with knowledge, and (2) to solve those difficulties the teacher carries out various ways by discussing and sharing with other geography teacher, participates in MGMP activities from the school to the district level, attends trainings or workshops to add insight and various information for the improvements in developing learning media. \\nKeywords: obstacles, learning media, curriculum 2013 \\nReferences \\n  \\nCheung, A.C.K & Wong, P.M. (2012). “Factors Affecting the Implementation of Curriculum Reform in Hong Kong: Key Findings from a Large‐Scale Survey Study”. International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 26 Iss: 1, pp.39 – 54. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513541- 211194374. \\n  \\nEraslan, A. (2013). “Teachers’ Reflections on the Implementation of the New Elementary School Mathematics Curriculum in Turkey”. HU Journal of of Education. 28 (2), 152-165. \\nMulyasa. E (2014). Pengembangan dan Implementasi kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. \\nKankam, B., Bordoh, A., Eshum, I., Bassaw, T.K, & Korang, F.Y. (2014). ”Teachers’ Perception of Authentic Assessment Techniques Practice in Social Studies Lessonsin Senior High Schools in Ghana”. International Journal of Educational Researchand Information Science. 1 (4): 62-68. \\nKatuuk, D.A. (2014). Manajemen Implementasi Kurikulum: Strategi Penguatan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 13 (1): 13-26. \\nKurebwa, M. & Nyaruwata, L.T. 2013. ”Assessment Challenges in the Primary Schools: A Case of Gweru Urban Schools”. Greener Journal of Educational Research 3(7), pp. 336-344. \\nLumadi, M.W. (2013). “Challenges Besetting Teachers in Classroom Assessment: An Exploratory Perspective”. Journal of Social Science. 34 (3): 211-221. \\nMayer, V.J. & Fortner, R.W. (1987). “Relative Effectiveness of Four Modes of Dissemination of Curriculum Materials”, TheJournal of Environmental Education, 19(1) 25-30. Doi:10.1080/00958964.1987.- 10801957. \\nMenteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 81 Tahun 2013 tentang Pelaksanaan Penilaian. \\nMenteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. 2014. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 104 Tahun 2014 tentang Pelaksanaan Penilaian. \\nRyder, J., Banner, I., & Homer, M. (2014). “Teachers’ Experiences of Science Curriculum \\n       Reform”. School. \\nSugiyono. (2007). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandungan: Alfabeta. \\nSukardi. (2005). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan Kompetensi dan Praktiknya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. \\nSyomwene, A. (2013). “Factors Affecting Teachers’ Implementation of Curriculum Reforms and Educational Policies in Schools: The Kenyan Experience”. Journalof Education and Practice. 4 (22) 80- 86. \\nWina Sanjaya. (2010). Perencanaan & Desain Sistem Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana. \\nCopyright (c) 2018 Geosfera Indonesia Journal and Department of Geography Education, University of Jember \\n This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share A like 4.0 International License\",\"PeriodicalId\":33276,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Geosfera Indonesia\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-04-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Geosfera Indonesia\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19184/GEOSI.V4I1.9294\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Geosfera Indonesia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19184/GEOSI.V4I1.9294","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究旨在确定:(1)SMA n1ngaglik地理教师在开发学习媒体方面的困难,以及(2)如何解决这些困难。本研究在SMA n1 Ngaglik进行。本研究采用描述性定性方法。本研究以地理教师为研究对象。使用的数据收集技术是观察、访谈和记录。本研究的数据分析技术采用交互式分析,包括数据收集、数据简化、数据呈现和结论。本研究结果表明:(1)学校存在的障碍,如教师只采用科学的方法制定教学大纲,没有按照《2013年课程》开展所有的学习模式,学习媒体开发困难,学习媒体开发困难,知识平衡态度和技能评估困难等;(2)教师通过与其他地理教师讨论和分享等多种方式解决这些困难;参与从学校到地区的MGMP活动,参加培训或研讨会,为开发学习媒体提供见解和各种信息。关键词:障碍,学习媒介,课程2013参考文献b张,A.C.K & Wong, P.M.(2012)。影响香港课程改革实施的因素:一项大规模调查研究的主要结果。国际教育管理学报,第26卷第1期,第39 - 54页。Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513541- 211194374。Eraslan, A.(2013)。教师对土耳其小学数学新课程实施的思考教育学报,28(2),152-165。Mulyasa。E(2014)。彭邦安丹实施库库库库2013。万隆:罗斯达里亚先生。Kankam, B., Bordoh, A., Eshum, I., Bassaw, t.k., & Korang, F.Y.(2014)。加纳高中社会研究课程中教师对真实评估技术的感知实践”。国际教育研究与信息科学,1(4):62-68。Katuuk, D.A.(2014)。企鹅库库的管理实施:战略企鹅库库的实施2013。[j] .中国生物医学工程,2013(1):13-26。Kurebwa, M. & Nyaruwata, L.T. 2013。小学评估的挑战:以瓜鲁城市学校为例教育研究学报3(7),pp. 336-344。Lumadi, M.W.(2013)。“课堂评估中困扰教师的挑战:一个探索性的视角”。社会科学学报,34(3):211-221。Mayer, V.J. & Fortner, R.W.(1987)。“四种课程教材传播模式的相对有效性”,《环境教育》,19(1):25-30。Doi: 10.1080/00958964.1987。- 10801957。部长Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan共和国印度尼西亚。(2013)。Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 81 Tahun 2013 tentang Pelaksanaan Penilaian。印度尼西亚共和国,2014。Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 104 Tahun 2014 tentang Pelaksanaan Penilaian。Ryder, J., Banner, I.和Homer, M.(2014)。“科学课程改革的教师经验”。学校。Sugiyono。(2007)。方法Penelitian kuantiantikatialititandan的研发。Sukardi。(2005)。方法学Penelitian Pendidikan Kompetensi dan Praktiknya。雅加达:Bumi Aksara。李建平,李建平(2013)。“影响教师实施课程改革和学校教育政策的因素:肯尼亚经验”。教育与实践杂志。4(22)80- 86。Wina桑佳亚。(2010)。perencanan & Desain系统。雅加达:Kencana。版权所有(c) 2018 Geosfera印度尼西亚杂志和Jember大学地理教育系本作品采用知识共享署名-共享a like 4.0国际许可
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
CONSTRAINTS OF GEOGRAPHY TEACHER OF SMA N 1 NGAGLIK IN DEVELOPING THE 2013 CURRICULUM LEARNING DEVICES IN SLEMAN REGENCY
This study aims to determine: (1) the difficulties of geography teachers in SMA N 1 Ngaglik to develop learning media, and (2) how to solve those difficulties. This research was conducted in SMA N 1 Ngaglik. This study used descriptive qualitative method. The subjects in this study were the geography teachers. The data collection techniques used was observation, interviews, and documentation. The data analysis technique in this study used interactive analysis which includes data collection, data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion. The results of this study indicate: (1) the obstacles found in the school like the teachers develop syllabus using a scientific approach only, they have not carried out all learning models in accordance with Curriculum 2013, the difficulties in developing learning media, the difficulties in developing learning media, and the difficulties in assessing balanced attitudes and skills with knowledge, and (2) to solve those difficulties the teacher carries out various ways by discussing and sharing with other geography teacher, participates in MGMP activities from the school to the district level, attends trainings or workshops to add insight and various information for the improvements in developing learning media. Keywords: obstacles, learning media, curriculum 2013 References   Cheung, A.C.K & Wong, P.M. (2012). “Factors Affecting the Implementation of Curriculum Reform in Hong Kong: Key Findings from a Large‐Scale Survey Study”. International Journal of Educational Management, Vol. 26 Iss: 1, pp.39 – 54. Doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/09513541- 211194374.   Eraslan, A. (2013). “Teachers’ Reflections on the Implementation of the New Elementary School Mathematics Curriculum in Turkey”. HU Journal of of Education. 28 (2), 152-165. Mulyasa. E (2014). Pengembangan dan Implementasi kurikulum 2013. Bandung: PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. Kankam, B., Bordoh, A., Eshum, I., Bassaw, T.K, & Korang, F.Y. (2014). ”Teachers’ Perception of Authentic Assessment Techniques Practice in Social Studies Lessonsin Senior High Schools in Ghana”. International Journal of Educational Researchand Information Science. 1 (4): 62-68. Katuuk, D.A. (2014). Manajemen Implementasi Kurikulum: Strategi Penguatan Implementasi Kurikulum 2013. Cakrawala Pendidikan, 13 (1): 13-26. Kurebwa, M. & Nyaruwata, L.T. 2013. ”Assessment Challenges in the Primary Schools: A Case of Gweru Urban Schools”. Greener Journal of Educational Research 3(7), pp. 336-344. Lumadi, M.W. (2013). “Challenges Besetting Teachers in Classroom Assessment: An Exploratory Perspective”. Journal of Social Science. 34 (3): 211-221. Mayer, V.J. & Fortner, R.W. (1987). “Relative Effectiveness of Four Modes of Dissemination of Curriculum Materials”, TheJournal of Environmental Education, 19(1) 25-30. Doi:10.1080/00958964.1987.- 10801957. Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. (2013). Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 81 Tahun 2013 tentang Pelaksanaan Penilaian. Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Republik Indonesia. 2014. Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan Nomor 104 Tahun 2014 tentang Pelaksanaan Penilaian. Ryder, J., Banner, I., & Homer, M. (2014). “Teachers’ Experiences of Science Curriculum        Reform”. School. Sugiyono. (2007). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif Kualitatif dan R & D. Bandungan: Alfabeta. Sukardi. (2005). Metodologi Penelitian Pendidikan Kompetensi dan Praktiknya. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. Syomwene, A. (2013). “Factors Affecting Teachers’ Implementation of Curriculum Reforms and Educational Policies in Schools: The Kenyan Experience”. Journalof Education and Practice. 4 (22) 80- 86. Wina Sanjaya. (2010). Perencanaan & Desain Sistem Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Kencana. Copyright (c) 2018 Geosfera Indonesia Journal and Department of Geography Education, University of Jember This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Share A like 4.0 International License
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
14
审稿时长
16 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信