音乐信息的问题。表达结构的语义能力

IF 0.1 0 MUSIC
Oleg Garaz
{"title":"音乐信息的问题。表达结构的语义能力","authors":"Oleg Garaz","doi":"10.24193/subbmusica.2023.spiss1.05","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Is it possible to communicate through music? Does music communicate something in particular? Is music like the message in a bottle – the meaning wrapped in the envelope of a form? Who would be the recipient of the musical message in this case – one, many, all of humanity, as in the IV parts of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony? Or maybe just Captain Grant’s children? And how pertinent is the extrapolation of notional-discursive schema and logic to music as Mattheson did in Der Vollkommene Kapellmeister? Because this phrase – the message of music – immediately refers to both the suggestive neutrality of musical sounds and the emotional irrelevance of the relationships between them. Sounds are just sounds. Is a chord the analogy of the word, the melody the analogy of the phrase, and a whole articulation the substitute of a speech? Is music a language? Or, indeed, being both sonorous, but also processual and symbolic, just like spoken language, music does not connote in the same way. And if the language has prescribed references, then music does not. A chord, a melody, let alone a counterpoint, have no predetermined meaning, not even one resembling a notional one, even after the performance is over. Should the composer first be a very good connoisseur of human emotional behavior rather than a very good musician? Or, perhaps, a simple postman, as in the famous song of the Beatles? Keywords: message, communication, language, connotation, symbol, process, music\"","PeriodicalId":40238,"journal":{"name":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Musica","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Question of the Musical Message. The Semantic Capacity of the Expressive Structure\",\"authors\":\"Oleg Garaz\",\"doi\":\"10.24193/subbmusica.2023.spiss1.05\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\\"Is it possible to communicate through music? Does music communicate something in particular? Is music like the message in a bottle – the meaning wrapped in the envelope of a form? Who would be the recipient of the musical message in this case – one, many, all of humanity, as in the IV parts of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony? Or maybe just Captain Grant’s children? And how pertinent is the extrapolation of notional-discursive schema and logic to music as Mattheson did in Der Vollkommene Kapellmeister? Because this phrase – the message of music – immediately refers to both the suggestive neutrality of musical sounds and the emotional irrelevance of the relationships between them. Sounds are just sounds. Is a chord the analogy of the word, the melody the analogy of the phrase, and a whole articulation the substitute of a speech? Is music a language? Or, indeed, being both sonorous, but also processual and symbolic, just like spoken language, music does not connote in the same way. And if the language has prescribed references, then music does not. A chord, a melody, let alone a counterpoint, have no predetermined meaning, not even one resembling a notional one, even after the performance is over. Should the composer first be a very good connoisseur of human emotional behavior rather than a very good musician? Or, perhaps, a simple postman, as in the famous song of the Beatles? Keywords: message, communication, language, connotation, symbol, process, music\\\"\",\"PeriodicalId\":40238,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Musica\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Musica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24193/subbmusica.2023.spiss1.05\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"MUSIC\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Studia Universitatis Babes-Bolyai Musica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24193/subbmusica.2023.spiss1.05","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

“有可能通过音乐进行交流吗?音乐能传达特定的东西吗?音乐就像瓶子里的信息吗?是包裹在表格信封里的意义吗?在这种情况下,谁会是音乐信息的接受者——一个、多个、全人类,就像贝多芬第九交响曲第四部分中的那样?或者可能只是格兰特上尉的孩子概念话语图式和逻辑对音乐的演绎,就像Mattheson在Der Vollkommene Kapellmeister中所做的那样?因为这个短语——音乐的信息——立即指的是音乐声音的暗示中性和它们之间关系的情感无关。声音就是声音。和弦是单词的类比,旋律是短语的类比,整个发音是语音的替代吗?音乐是一种语言吗?或者,事实上,音乐既铿锵有力,又具有过程性和象征性,就像口语一样,其内涵并不相同。如果语言有规定的参考,那么音乐就没有。和弦、旋律,更不用说对位了,即使在表演结束后,也没有预先确定的意义,甚至不像概念上的意义。作曲家应该首先是一个非常优秀的人类情感行为鉴赏家,而不是一个非常好的音乐家吗?或者,也许是一个简单的邮递员,就像披头士乐队的著名歌曲中那样?关键词:信息、交流、语言、内涵、符号、过程、音乐”
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Question of the Musical Message. The Semantic Capacity of the Expressive Structure
"Is it possible to communicate through music? Does music communicate something in particular? Is music like the message in a bottle – the meaning wrapped in the envelope of a form? Who would be the recipient of the musical message in this case – one, many, all of humanity, as in the IV parts of Beethoven’s Ninth Symphony? Or maybe just Captain Grant’s children? And how pertinent is the extrapolation of notional-discursive schema and logic to music as Mattheson did in Der Vollkommene Kapellmeister? Because this phrase – the message of music – immediately refers to both the suggestive neutrality of musical sounds and the emotional irrelevance of the relationships between them. Sounds are just sounds. Is a chord the analogy of the word, the melody the analogy of the phrase, and a whole articulation the substitute of a speech? Is music a language? Or, indeed, being both sonorous, but also processual and symbolic, just like spoken language, music does not connote in the same way. And if the language has prescribed references, then music does not. A chord, a melody, let alone a counterpoint, have no predetermined meaning, not even one resembling a notional one, even after the performance is over. Should the composer first be a very good connoisseur of human emotional behavior rather than a very good musician? Or, perhaps, a simple postman, as in the famous song of the Beatles? Keywords: message, communication, language, connotation, symbol, process, music"
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
31
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信