考虑不同保真度车辆模型的mpc轨迹跟踪实现

Q4 Engineering
Shuping Chen, Huiyan Chen, D. Negrut
{"title":"考虑不同保真度车辆模型的mpc轨迹跟踪实现","authors":"Shuping Chen, Huiyan Chen, D. Negrut","doi":"10.15918/J.JBIT1004-0579.19101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In order to investigate how model fidelity in the formulation of model predictive control(MPC) algorithm affects the path tracking performance, a bicycle model and an 8 degrees of freedom(DOF) vehicle model, as well as a 14-DOF vehicle model were employed to implement the MPC-based path tracking controller considering the constraints of input limit and output admissibility by using a lower fidelity vehicle model to control a higher fidelity vehicle model. In the MPC controller, the nonlinear vehicle model was linearized and discretized for state prediction and vehicle heading angle, lateral position and longitudinal position were chosen as objectives in the cost function. The wheel step steering and sine wave steering responses between the developed vehicle models and the Carsim model were compared for validation before implementing the model predictive path tracking control. The simulation results of trajectory tracking considering an 8-shaped curved reference path were presented and compared when the prediction model and the plant were changed. The results show that the trajectory tracking errors are small and the tracking performances of the proposed controller considering different complexity vehicle models are good in the curved road environment. Additionally, the MPC-based controller formulated with a high-fidelity model performs better than that with a low-fidelity model in the trajectory tracking.","PeriodicalId":39252,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (English Edition)","volume":"29 1","pages":"303-316"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Implementation of MPC-Based Trajectory Tracking Considering Different Fidelity Vehicle Models\",\"authors\":\"Shuping Chen, Huiyan Chen, D. Negrut\",\"doi\":\"10.15918/J.JBIT1004-0579.19101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In order to investigate how model fidelity in the formulation of model predictive control(MPC) algorithm affects the path tracking performance, a bicycle model and an 8 degrees of freedom(DOF) vehicle model, as well as a 14-DOF vehicle model were employed to implement the MPC-based path tracking controller considering the constraints of input limit and output admissibility by using a lower fidelity vehicle model to control a higher fidelity vehicle model. In the MPC controller, the nonlinear vehicle model was linearized and discretized for state prediction and vehicle heading angle, lateral position and longitudinal position were chosen as objectives in the cost function. The wheel step steering and sine wave steering responses between the developed vehicle models and the Carsim model were compared for validation before implementing the model predictive path tracking control. The simulation results of trajectory tracking considering an 8-shaped curved reference path were presented and compared when the prediction model and the plant were changed. The results show that the trajectory tracking errors are small and the tracking performances of the proposed controller considering different complexity vehicle models are good in the curved road environment. Additionally, the MPC-based controller formulated with a high-fidelity model performs better than that with a low-fidelity model in the trajectory tracking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":39252,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"303-316\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"9\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.15918/J.JBIT1004-0579.19101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Engineering\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Beijing Institute of Technology (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15918/J.JBIT1004-0579.19101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

摘要

为了研究模型预测控制(MPC)算法中模型保真度对路径跟踪性能的影响,采用自行车模型、8自由度(DOF)车辆模型和14自由度(DOF)车辆模型,采用低保真度车辆模型控制高保真度车辆模型,考虑输入限制和输出允许约束,实现了基于MPC的路径跟踪控制器。在MPC控制器中,对非线性车辆模型进行线性化和离散化以进行状态预测,并在代价函数中选择车辆航向角、横向位置和纵向位置作为目标。在实现模型预测路径跟踪控制之前,将所开发的车辆模型与Carsim模型之间的车轮阶跃转向和正弦波转向响应进行了比较验证。给出了考虑8形曲线参考路径的轨迹跟踪仿真结果,并比较了预测模型和目标改变时的轨迹跟踪仿真结果。结果表明,该控制器在考虑不同复杂度车辆模型的情况下,轨迹跟踪误差较小,在弯曲道路环境下具有良好的跟踪性能。此外,采用高保真度模型构建的基于mpc的控制器在轨迹跟踪方面优于采用低保真度模型构建的控制器。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Implementation of MPC-Based Trajectory Tracking Considering Different Fidelity Vehicle Models
In order to investigate how model fidelity in the formulation of model predictive control(MPC) algorithm affects the path tracking performance, a bicycle model and an 8 degrees of freedom(DOF) vehicle model, as well as a 14-DOF vehicle model were employed to implement the MPC-based path tracking controller considering the constraints of input limit and output admissibility by using a lower fidelity vehicle model to control a higher fidelity vehicle model. In the MPC controller, the nonlinear vehicle model was linearized and discretized for state prediction and vehicle heading angle, lateral position and longitudinal position were chosen as objectives in the cost function. The wheel step steering and sine wave steering responses between the developed vehicle models and the Carsim model were compared for validation before implementing the model predictive path tracking control. The simulation results of trajectory tracking considering an 8-shaped curved reference path were presented and compared when the prediction model and the plant were changed. The results show that the trajectory tracking errors are small and the tracking performances of the proposed controller considering different complexity vehicle models are good in the curved road environment. Additionally, the MPC-based controller formulated with a high-fidelity model performs better than that with a low-fidelity model in the trajectory tracking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2437
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信