波罗的海国家和斯堪的纳维亚半岛的仲裁

IF 0.2 Q4 LAW
B. Warwas
{"title":"波罗的海国家和斯堪的纳维亚半岛的仲裁","authors":"B. Warwas","doi":"10.1163/22134514-00601001","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article builds off the empirical research conducted within the Study on the Legal Instruments and Practice of Arbitration in the eu and Switzerland, commissioned by the Legal Affairs Committee of the European Parliament. It discusses the empirical data collected in the course of the Study, and the most recent legal developments on arbitration regarding five Member States – Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Finland, and Sweden – referred to as ‘the Baltic States and Scandinavia’. Hence, this article shifts the discussion on arbitration from elite practitioners to more local arbitration practices, uncovering the so-called ‘grey zone’ largely missing from the mainstream discussion of arbitration.","PeriodicalId":37233,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2019-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/22134514-00601001","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Arbitration in the Baltic States and Scandinavia\",\"authors\":\"B. Warwas\",\"doi\":\"10.1163/22134514-00601001\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article builds off the empirical research conducted within the Study on the Legal Instruments and Practice of Arbitration in the eu and Switzerland, commissioned by the Legal Affairs Committee of the European Parliament. It discusses the empirical data collected in the course of the Study, and the most recent legal developments on arbitration regarding five Member States – Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Finland, and Sweden – referred to as ‘the Baltic States and Scandinavia’. Hence, this article shifts the discussion on arbitration from elite practitioners to more local arbitration practices, uncovering the so-called ‘grey zone’ largely missing from the mainstream discussion of arbitration.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37233,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1163/22134514-00601001\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-00601001\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"LAW\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Comparative Law and Governance","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1163/22134514-00601001","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LAW","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文以欧洲议会法律事务委员会委托进行的《欧盟和瑞士仲裁法律文书与实践研究》的实证研究为基础。它讨论了在研究过程中收集的经验数据,以及爱沙尼亚、立陶宛、拉脱维亚、芬兰和瑞典这五个被称为“波罗的海国家和斯堪的纳维亚”的成员国在仲裁方面的最新法律发展。因此,本文将对仲裁的讨论从精英从业者转向更多的地方仲裁实践,揭示了在仲裁的主流讨论中很大程度上缺失的所谓“灰色地带”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Arbitration in the Baltic States and Scandinavia
This article builds off the empirical research conducted within the Study on the Legal Instruments and Practice of Arbitration in the eu and Switzerland, commissioned by the Legal Affairs Committee of the European Parliament. It discusses the empirical data collected in the course of the Study, and the most recent legal developments on arbitration regarding five Member States – Estonia, Lithuania, Latvia, Finland, and Sweden – referred to as ‘the Baltic States and Scandinavia’. Hence, this article shifts the discussion on arbitration from elite practitioners to more local arbitration practices, uncovering the so-called ‘grey zone’ largely missing from the mainstream discussion of arbitration.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信