{"title":"东亚语言创造性语言使用的语用学研究","authors":"H. Tao, Ryoko Suzuki","doi":"10.1558/eap.24315","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Creative language use has been one of the foundational issues for much of modern linguistics. For example, Chomsky’s (1957, 1965) generative programme rests crucially on the notion of the creative aspect of language use (along with the notion of the alleged poverty of stimulus, McGilvray, 2001) as he defines them. Thus, Chomsky (1965, p. 6) articulates the theoretical interest of generative grammar in terms of an underlying grammatical device for diverse ranges and novel situations of language production and comprehension, in the realm of performance:","PeriodicalId":37018,"journal":{"name":"East Asian Pragmatics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The pragmatics of creative language use in East Asian languages\",\"authors\":\"H. Tao, Ryoko Suzuki\",\"doi\":\"10.1558/eap.24315\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Creative language use has been one of the foundational issues for much of modern linguistics. For example, Chomsky’s (1957, 1965) generative programme rests crucially on the notion of the creative aspect of language use (along with the notion of the alleged poverty of stimulus, McGilvray, 2001) as he defines them. Thus, Chomsky (1965, p. 6) articulates the theoretical interest of generative grammar in terms of an underlying grammatical device for diverse ranges and novel situations of language production and comprehension, in the realm of performance:\",\"PeriodicalId\":37018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"East Asian Pragmatics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-11-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"East Asian Pragmatics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.24315\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"East Asian Pragmatics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1558/eap.24315","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
The pragmatics of creative language use in East Asian languages
Creative language use has been one of the foundational issues for much of modern linguistics. For example, Chomsky’s (1957, 1965) generative programme rests crucially on the notion of the creative aspect of language use (along with the notion of the alleged poverty of stimulus, McGilvray, 2001) as he defines them. Thus, Chomsky (1965, p. 6) articulates the theoretical interest of generative grammar in terms of an underlying grammatical device for diverse ranges and novel situations of language production and comprehension, in the realm of performance: