包豪斯教育设计

IF 0.6 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
Andy Kaplan
{"title":"包豪斯教育设计","authors":"Andy Kaplan","doi":"10.1086/722019","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Before this winter, my acquaintance with the Bauhaus was at once literal and vague: I knew a few architects by name, I associated their work with glass and steel, and I admired and had even sat in chairs designed by Marcel Breuer. “Form follows function,” Louis Sullivan’s watchword for modern architecture, appealed more for its alliteration than for its effects as informing aesthetic principle. Acquaintance led to fascination because of two courses I took this winter. In an art history class, I learned that the Bauhaus was not only about architecture, it was a school whose teachers were some of the most important artists of the twentieth century:Wassily Kandinsky, Annie and Josef Albers, Marcel Breuer, and Paul Klee were members of the faculty in the German iterations of the school. My enthusiasm for the Bauhaus then intersected with my passion for photography. I took a course called Photography in the Bauhaus taught by Iris Lutz at the Chicago Botanic Garden. Iris gave us a much more detailed and precise appreciation of the Bauhaus as a school, first in Germany from 1919–1933 and then in Chicago from 1937–2001. We learned about the rigors of the “preliminary course,” which introduced students to the materials and tools of the arts. Students learned how to design and shape materials, weaving textiles on a loom, shaping wood on a jigsaw or lathe, cutting and tinting glass, transforming sheet metal using the tools of metalsmithing. Every student learned how to manipulate materials using the latest advances in technology (fig. 1). This “curriculum wheel” was the way Walter Gropius in 1922 presented the design of the four-year program he initiated at the Bauhaus in Weimar. Gropius “hoped that various forms of artistic practice—painting, sculpture, architecture, and design chief among them—could work in harmony at the new school to produce the socially oriented and spiritually gratifying ‘building of the future’” (Casciato et al. 2019). Although the program had close ties to Gropius’s work as an architect, he committed the school to a holistic","PeriodicalId":41440,"journal":{"name":"Schools-Studies in Education","volume":"19 1","pages":"408 - 419"},"PeriodicalIF":0.6000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Designing Bauhaus Education\",\"authors\":\"Andy Kaplan\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/722019\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Before this winter, my acquaintance with the Bauhaus was at once literal and vague: I knew a few architects by name, I associated their work with glass and steel, and I admired and had even sat in chairs designed by Marcel Breuer. “Form follows function,” Louis Sullivan’s watchword for modern architecture, appealed more for its alliteration than for its effects as informing aesthetic principle. Acquaintance led to fascination because of two courses I took this winter. In an art history class, I learned that the Bauhaus was not only about architecture, it was a school whose teachers were some of the most important artists of the twentieth century:Wassily Kandinsky, Annie and Josef Albers, Marcel Breuer, and Paul Klee were members of the faculty in the German iterations of the school. My enthusiasm for the Bauhaus then intersected with my passion for photography. I took a course called Photography in the Bauhaus taught by Iris Lutz at the Chicago Botanic Garden. Iris gave us a much more detailed and precise appreciation of the Bauhaus as a school, first in Germany from 1919–1933 and then in Chicago from 1937–2001. We learned about the rigors of the “preliminary course,” which introduced students to the materials and tools of the arts. Students learned how to design and shape materials, weaving textiles on a loom, shaping wood on a jigsaw or lathe, cutting and tinting glass, transforming sheet metal using the tools of metalsmithing. Every student learned how to manipulate materials using the latest advances in technology (fig. 1). This “curriculum wheel” was the way Walter Gropius in 1922 presented the design of the four-year program he initiated at the Bauhaus in Weimar. Gropius “hoped that various forms of artistic practice—painting, sculpture, architecture, and design chief among them—could work in harmony at the new school to produce the socially oriented and spiritually gratifying ‘building of the future’” (Casciato et al. 2019). Although the program had close ties to Gropius’s work as an architect, he committed the school to a holistic\",\"PeriodicalId\":41440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Schools-Studies in Education\",\"volume\":\"19 1\",\"pages\":\"408 - 419\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Schools-Studies in Education\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/722019\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Schools-Studies in Education","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/722019","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这个冬天之前,我对包豪斯的了解既简单又模糊:我知道几个建筑师的名字,我把他们的作品与玻璃和钢联系在一起,我钦佩甚至坐过马塞尔·布鲁尔设计的椅子。Louis Sullivan的现代建筑口号“形式遵循功能”,更多的是因为它的头韵,而不是因为它作为传达美学原则的效果。由于今年冬天我上了两门课,熟人关系使我着迷。在一堂艺术史课上,我了解到包豪斯不仅仅是关于建筑的,这所学校的老师都是20世纪最重要的艺术家:瓦西里·康定斯基、安妮和约瑟夫·阿尔伯斯、马塞尔·布鲁尔和保罗·克莱都是该校德语版的教员。我对包豪斯的热情与我对摄影的热情相交。我参加了一门名为“包豪斯摄影”的课程,由Iris Lutz在芝加哥植物园教授。Iris让我们更详细、更准确地了解了包豪斯作为一所学校的情况,首先是1919年至1933年在德国,然后是1937年至2001年在芝加哥。我们了解了“初级课程”的严格性,该课程向学生介绍了艺术的材料和工具。学生们学习了如何设计和塑造材料,在织机上编织纺织品,在竖锯或车床上塑造木材,切割和着色玻璃,使用金属锻造工具改造金属板。每个学生都学习了如何利用最新的技术进步来操纵材料(图1)。1922年,沃尔特·格罗皮乌斯(Walter Gropius)提出了他在魏玛包豪斯(Bauhaus)发起的四年制课程的设计,这就是“课程车轮”。格罗皮乌斯“希望各种形式的艺术实践——其中包括绘画、雕塑、建筑和设计总监——能够在新学校和谐合作,产生面向社会、精神上令人满意的‘未来建筑’”(Casciato等人,2019)。尽管该项目与Gropius作为建筑师的工作有着密切的联系,但他致力于学校的整体
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Designing Bauhaus Education
Before this winter, my acquaintance with the Bauhaus was at once literal and vague: I knew a few architects by name, I associated their work with glass and steel, and I admired and had even sat in chairs designed by Marcel Breuer. “Form follows function,” Louis Sullivan’s watchword for modern architecture, appealed more for its alliteration than for its effects as informing aesthetic principle. Acquaintance led to fascination because of two courses I took this winter. In an art history class, I learned that the Bauhaus was not only about architecture, it was a school whose teachers were some of the most important artists of the twentieth century:Wassily Kandinsky, Annie and Josef Albers, Marcel Breuer, and Paul Klee were members of the faculty in the German iterations of the school. My enthusiasm for the Bauhaus then intersected with my passion for photography. I took a course called Photography in the Bauhaus taught by Iris Lutz at the Chicago Botanic Garden. Iris gave us a much more detailed and precise appreciation of the Bauhaus as a school, first in Germany from 1919–1933 and then in Chicago from 1937–2001. We learned about the rigors of the “preliminary course,” which introduced students to the materials and tools of the arts. Students learned how to design and shape materials, weaving textiles on a loom, shaping wood on a jigsaw or lathe, cutting and tinting glass, transforming sheet metal using the tools of metalsmithing. Every student learned how to manipulate materials using the latest advances in technology (fig. 1). This “curriculum wheel” was the way Walter Gropius in 1922 presented the design of the four-year program he initiated at the Bauhaus in Weimar. Gropius “hoped that various forms of artistic practice—painting, sculpture, architecture, and design chief among them—could work in harmony at the new school to produce the socially oriented and spiritually gratifying ‘building of the future’” (Casciato et al. 2019). Although the program had close ties to Gropius’s work as an architect, he committed the school to a holistic
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Schools-Studies in Education
Schools-Studies in Education EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信