转移性乳腺癌患者吡格列酮联合化疗与单独化疗的随机II期临床试验。

Reza Moghareabed, S. Hemati, A. Akhavan, H. Emami, M. Farghadani, M. Roayaei, Saeideh Tavajoh, A. Feizi
{"title":"转移性乳腺癌患者吡格列酮联合化疗与单独化疗的随机II期临床试验。","authors":"Reza Moghareabed, S. Hemati, A. Akhavan, H. Emami, M. Farghadani, M. Roayaei, Saeideh Tavajoh, A. Feizi","doi":"10.1200/jgo.2019.5.suppl.83","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"83 Background: Breast carcinoma is the second cause of mortality between female cancers and metastasis is the main contributing factor to the mortality in patients with breast cancer. Optimal management for visceral metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains unknown. In this study we aimed to assess if adding pioglitazone to chemotherapy regimen can improve response in patients with MBC. Methods: This double-blind randomized clinical trial enrolled women 18 years or older with visceral MBC either previously treated with adjuvant therapy or currently are undergoing different lines of endocrine and chemotherapy regimens. The main objective of this study is to compare treatment efficacy in patients with visceral MBC taking chemotherapy plus Pioglitazone (n = 30) versus chemotherapy in addition to placebo (n = 30) over three months. The efficacy evaluated by change in radiologic response defined by the proportion of patients with stable or partial/complete radiologic response to those experienced disease progression based on Revised Recist Guideline ver (1.1). Results: Combination of pioglitazone and chemotherapy led to higher complete radiologic response (7.4% vs.0%) stable disease status (66·7% vs. 53·6%) and lower progression (22·2% vs. 35·7%) rates, however the differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.24). Clinical benefit rate (CBR, proportion of patients with complete response, partial response, or stable disease) was 77.8% in pioglitazone group vs. 64.3% in control group (p = 0.27). Subgroup analysis revealed higher efficacy but not statistically significant among diabetic woman, who had hormone-receptor–positive tumor. Furthermore, patients treated with Taxan +/-Carboplatin agents had significantly higher stable disease status, lower progression rate and higher complete response rate than the placebo group (P = 0·03). Conclusions: This is the first reported randomized clinical trial on the efficacy of pioglitazone in patients with visceral MBC which demonstrated safety and improvement of response in the subgroup of Taxan / Carboplatin chemotherapy regimen. These findings are in agreement with previous results of in vitro preclinical studies. Clinical trial information: IRCT20180124038493N1.","PeriodicalId":15862,"journal":{"name":"Journal of global oncology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Randomized phase II clinical trial of pioglitazone plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with metastatic breast cancer.\",\"authors\":\"Reza Moghareabed, S. Hemati, A. Akhavan, H. Emami, M. Farghadani, M. Roayaei, Saeideh Tavajoh, A. Feizi\",\"doi\":\"10.1200/jgo.2019.5.suppl.83\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"83 Background: Breast carcinoma is the second cause of mortality between female cancers and metastasis is the main contributing factor to the mortality in patients with breast cancer. Optimal management for visceral metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains unknown. In this study we aimed to assess if adding pioglitazone to chemotherapy regimen can improve response in patients with MBC. Methods: This double-blind randomized clinical trial enrolled women 18 years or older with visceral MBC either previously treated with adjuvant therapy or currently are undergoing different lines of endocrine and chemotherapy regimens. The main objective of this study is to compare treatment efficacy in patients with visceral MBC taking chemotherapy plus Pioglitazone (n = 30) versus chemotherapy in addition to placebo (n = 30) over three months. The efficacy evaluated by change in radiologic response defined by the proportion of patients with stable or partial/complete radiologic response to those experienced disease progression based on Revised Recist Guideline ver (1.1). Results: Combination of pioglitazone and chemotherapy led to higher complete radiologic response (7.4% vs.0%) stable disease status (66·7% vs. 53·6%) and lower progression (22·2% vs. 35·7%) rates, however the differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.24). Clinical benefit rate (CBR, proportion of patients with complete response, partial response, or stable disease) was 77.8% in pioglitazone group vs. 64.3% in control group (p = 0.27). Subgroup analysis revealed higher efficacy but not statistically significant among diabetic woman, who had hormone-receptor–positive tumor. Furthermore, patients treated with Taxan +/-Carboplatin agents had significantly higher stable disease status, lower progression rate and higher complete response rate than the placebo group (P = 0·03). Conclusions: This is the first reported randomized clinical trial on the efficacy of pioglitazone in patients with visceral MBC which demonstrated safety and improvement of response in the subgroup of Taxan / Carboplatin chemotherapy regimen. These findings are in agreement with previous results of in vitro preclinical studies. Clinical trial information: IRCT20180124038493N1.\",\"PeriodicalId\":15862,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of global oncology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of global oncology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1200/jgo.2019.5.suppl.83\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of global oncology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1200/jgo.2019.5.suppl.83","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

83背景:乳腺癌是女性癌症死亡的第二大原因,转移是导致乳腺癌患者死亡的主要因素。内脏转移性乳腺癌(MBC)的最佳治疗方法尚不清楚。在这项研究中,我们旨在评估在化疗方案中加入吡格列酮是否可以改善MBC患者的反应。方法:这项双盲随机临床试验招募了18岁或以上的内脏MBC患者,这些患者要么以前接受过辅助治疗,要么目前正在接受不同的内分泌和化疗方案。本研究的主要目的是比较三个月内化疗加吡格列酮(n = 30)与化疗加安慰剂(n = 30)的内脏MBC患者的治疗效果。疗效通过放射反应的变化来评估,放射反应的变化由稳定或部分/完全放射反应的患者与经历疾病进展的患者的比例定义,该比例基于修订的Recist指南ver(1.1)。结果:吡格列酮联合化疗的完全放射反应率(7.4% vs.0%)较高,病情稳定(66.7% vs. 53.6%),进展率(22.2% vs. 35.7%)较低,但差异无统计学意义(P = 0.24)。吡格列酮组的临床获益率(CBR,完全缓解、部分缓解或疾病稳定的患者比例)为77.8%,对照组为64.3% (p = 0.27)。亚组分析显示,在患有激素受体阳性肿瘤的糖尿病女性患者中,疗效更高,但无统计学意义。与安慰剂组相比,Taxan +/-Carboplatin治疗组患者的疾病稳定状态更高,进展率更低,完全缓解率更高(P = 0.03)。结论:这是首个报道的吡格列酮治疗内脏性MBC患者疗效的随机临床试验,在Taxan / Carboplatin化疗方案亚组中证明了安全性和疗效的改善。这些发现与之前体外临床前研究的结果一致。临床试验信息:IRCT20180124038493N1。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Randomized phase II clinical trial of pioglitazone plus chemotherapy versus chemotherapy alone in patients with metastatic breast cancer.
83 Background: Breast carcinoma is the second cause of mortality between female cancers and metastasis is the main contributing factor to the mortality in patients with breast cancer. Optimal management for visceral metastatic breast cancer (MBC) remains unknown. In this study we aimed to assess if adding pioglitazone to chemotherapy regimen can improve response in patients with MBC. Methods: This double-blind randomized clinical trial enrolled women 18 years or older with visceral MBC either previously treated with adjuvant therapy or currently are undergoing different lines of endocrine and chemotherapy regimens. The main objective of this study is to compare treatment efficacy in patients with visceral MBC taking chemotherapy plus Pioglitazone (n = 30) versus chemotherapy in addition to placebo (n = 30) over three months. The efficacy evaluated by change in radiologic response defined by the proportion of patients with stable or partial/complete radiologic response to those experienced disease progression based on Revised Recist Guideline ver (1.1). Results: Combination of pioglitazone and chemotherapy led to higher complete radiologic response (7.4% vs.0%) stable disease status (66·7% vs. 53·6%) and lower progression (22·2% vs. 35·7%) rates, however the differences were not statistically significant (P = 0.24). Clinical benefit rate (CBR, proportion of patients with complete response, partial response, or stable disease) was 77.8% in pioglitazone group vs. 64.3% in control group (p = 0.27). Subgroup analysis revealed higher efficacy but not statistically significant among diabetic woman, who had hormone-receptor–positive tumor. Furthermore, patients treated with Taxan +/-Carboplatin agents had significantly higher stable disease status, lower progression rate and higher complete response rate than the placebo group (P = 0·03). Conclusions: This is the first reported randomized clinical trial on the efficacy of pioglitazone in patients with visceral MBC which demonstrated safety and improvement of response in the subgroup of Taxan / Carboplatin chemotherapy regimen. These findings are in agreement with previous results of in vitro preclinical studies. Clinical trial information: IRCT20180124038493N1.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊介绍: The Journal of Global Oncology (JGO) is an online only, open access journal focused on cancer care, research and care delivery issues unique to countries and settings with limited healthcare resources. JGO aims to provide a home for high-quality literature that fulfills a growing need for content describing the array of challenges health care professionals in resource-constrained settings face. Article types include original reports, review articles, commentaries, correspondence/replies, special articles and editorials.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信