伪hesiodic Aspis的两个注释(ΑΤΟΝ， 59;ΑΑΤΑΙ,101)

IF 0.7 2区历史学 0 CLASSICS

CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY Pub Date : 2023-01-01 DOI:10.1086/722516

Ruobing Xian

{"title":"伪hesiodic Aspis的两个注释(ΑΤΟΝ， 59;ΑΑΤΑΙ,101)","authors":"Ruobing Xian","doi":"10.1086/722516","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I argue for an intertextual connection between Aspis 59 and the Iliadic formula Ἄρης ἆτος πολέμοιο as well as an intratextual one between ἆτον πολέμοιο (Sc. 59) and ἄαται πολέμοιο (Sc. 101). I further suggest that ἄαται is an artificial form which has been playfully invented by the composer. This morphological interpretation of ἄαται might shed some new light on the isolated epic forms ἕωμεν (Il. 19.402) and ἄμεναι (Il. 21.70) from the same root (*seh2- “satiate oneself”).","PeriodicalId":46255,"journal":{"name":"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY","volume":"118 1","pages":"104 - 108"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Two Notes on the Pseudo-Hesiodic Aspis (ΑΤΟΝ, 59; ΑΑΤΑΙ, 101)\",\"authors\":\"Ruobing Xian\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/722516\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, I argue for an intertextual connection between Aspis 59 and the Iliadic formula Ἄρης ἆτος πολέμοιο as well as an intratextual one between ἆτον πολέμοιο (Sc. 59) and ἄαται πολέμοιο (Sc. 101). I further suggest that ἄαται is an artificial form which has been playfully invented by the composer. This morphological interpretation of ἄαται might shed some new light on the isolated epic forms ἕωμεν (Il. 19.402) and ἄμεναι (Il. 21.70) from the same root (*seh2- “satiate oneself”).\",\"PeriodicalId\":46255,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY\",\"volume\":\"118 1\",\"pages\":\"104 - 108\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/722516\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"历史学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"CLASSICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/722516","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"CLASSICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中，我认为Aspis59和伊利亚季奇公式之间存在互文联系Ἄρηςἆτιςπιλέμις以及介于ἆτ¦Γπ¦Βλέμ¦Αι¦Α（Sc.59）和ἄαταιπιλέμ¦Αι¦Α（Sc.101）。我进一步建议ἄαται是作曲家开玩笑地发明的一种人造形式。这种形态学解释ἄαται可能为孤立的史诗形式提供一些新的线索ἕωμεΓ（Il.19.402）和ἄμεσι（Il.21.70）来自同一根（*seh2-“满足自己”）。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Two Notes on the Pseudo-Hesiodic Aspis (ΑΤΟΝ, 59; ΑΑΤΑΙ, 101)

In this article, I argue for an intertextual connection between Aspis 59 and the Iliadic formula Ἄρης ἆτος πολέμοιο as well as an intratextual one between ἆτον πολέμοιο (Sc. 59) and ἄαται πολέμοιο (Sc. 101). I further suggest that ἄαται is an artificial form which has been playfully invented by the composer. This morphological interpretation of ἄαται might shed some new light on the isolated epic forms ἕωμεν (Il. 19.402) and ἄμεναι (Il. 21.70) from the same root (*seh2- “satiate oneself”).

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

CLASSICAL PHILOLOGY CLASSICS-

CiteScore

0.70

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： Classical Philology has been an internationally respected journal for the study of the life, languages, and thought of the Ancient Greek and Roman world since 1906. CP covers a broad range of topics from a variety of interpretative points of view. CP welcomes both longer articles and short notes or discussions that make a significant contribution to the study of Greek and Roman antiquity. Any field of classical studies may be treated, separately or in relation to other disciplines, ancient or modern. In particular, we invite studies that illuminate aspects of the languages, literatures, history, art, philosophy, social life, and religion of ancient Greece and Rome. Innovative approaches and originality are encouraged as a necessary part of good scholarship.