汽车公司精益生产实践评价案例研究

IF 1.9 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL
P. Hąbek, Juan J. Lavios, Adam Grzywa
{"title":"汽车公司精益生产实践评价案例研究","authors":"P. Hąbek, Juan J. Lavios, Adam Grzywa","doi":"10.30657/pea.2023.29.36","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Lean Manufacturing (LM) practices have gained popularity as a means to achieve high-quality products while reducing costs and delivery times. However, the implementation of LM can be challenging, with a high failure rate. This paper aims to explore the perspectives of employees and managers on LM practices implemented in an automotive company. The research involved primary and secondary data analysis, combining observation, interviews, and a questionnaire survey. The survey assessed knowledge and skills, impact on quality improvement, motivation, supervisor support, control, and engagement in LM development. The results highlight the importance of management commitment and support in achieving successful LM implementation. Moreover, the study emphasises the positive impact of LM practices on employee motivation and the overall quality of processes and products. The PDCA cycle emerged as the most impactful tool, along with other recognised tools like Poka Yoke, Andon, Kaizen, Visual Management, and the 5S method. The findings contribute to understanding the implementation and effects of LM practices, providing insights for companies seeking improvement through Lean Manufacturing methodologies.","PeriodicalId":36269,"journal":{"name":"Production Engineering Archives","volume":"29 1","pages":"311 - 318"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Lean Manufacturing Practices Assessment Case Study of Automotive Company\",\"authors\":\"P. Hąbek, Juan J. Lavios, Adam Grzywa\",\"doi\":\"10.30657/pea.2023.29.36\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Lean Manufacturing (LM) practices have gained popularity as a means to achieve high-quality products while reducing costs and delivery times. However, the implementation of LM can be challenging, with a high failure rate. This paper aims to explore the perspectives of employees and managers on LM practices implemented in an automotive company. The research involved primary and secondary data analysis, combining observation, interviews, and a questionnaire survey. The survey assessed knowledge and skills, impact on quality improvement, motivation, supervisor support, control, and engagement in LM development. The results highlight the importance of management commitment and support in achieving successful LM implementation. Moreover, the study emphasises the positive impact of LM practices on employee motivation and the overall quality of processes and products. The PDCA cycle emerged as the most impactful tool, along with other recognised tools like Poka Yoke, Andon, Kaizen, Visual Management, and the 5S method. The findings contribute to understanding the implementation and effects of LM practices, providing insights for companies seeking improvement through Lean Manufacturing methodologies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36269,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Production Engineering Archives\",\"volume\":\"29 1\",\"pages\":\"311 - 318\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-08-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Production Engineering Archives\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.30657/pea.2023.29.36\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Production Engineering Archives","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.30657/pea.2023.29.36","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要精益生产(LM)实践作为一种实现高质量产品同时降低成本和交货时间的手段已经得到了普及。然而,LM的实现可能具有挑战性,故障率很高。本文旨在探讨员工和管理者对LM实践在一家汽车公司实施的观点。本研究采用一手资料和二手资料分析相结合的方法,采用观察法、访谈法和问卷调查法。该调查评估了知识和技能、对质量改进的影响、动机、主管支持、控制和LM开发的参与。结果强调了管理承诺和支持在实现成功的LM实施中的重要性。此外,研究还强调了LM实践对员工激励以及过程和产品的整体质量的积极影响。与Poka Yoke、Andon、Kaizen、可视化管理和5S方法等其他公认的工具一样,PDCA循环成为最具影响力的工具。研究结果有助于理解LM实践的实施和效果,为通过精益制造方法寻求改进的公司提供见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Lean Manufacturing Practices Assessment Case Study of Automotive Company
Abstract Lean Manufacturing (LM) practices have gained popularity as a means to achieve high-quality products while reducing costs and delivery times. However, the implementation of LM can be challenging, with a high failure rate. This paper aims to explore the perspectives of employees and managers on LM practices implemented in an automotive company. The research involved primary and secondary data analysis, combining observation, interviews, and a questionnaire survey. The survey assessed knowledge and skills, impact on quality improvement, motivation, supervisor support, control, and engagement in LM development. The results highlight the importance of management commitment and support in achieving successful LM implementation. Moreover, the study emphasises the positive impact of LM practices on employee motivation and the overall quality of processes and products. The PDCA cycle emerged as the most impactful tool, along with other recognised tools like Poka Yoke, Andon, Kaizen, Visual Management, and the 5S method. The findings contribute to understanding the implementation and effects of LM practices, providing insights for companies seeking improvement through Lean Manufacturing methodologies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Production Engineering Archives
Production Engineering Archives Engineering-Industrial and Manufacturing Engineering
CiteScore
6.10
自引率
13.00%
发文量
50
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信