几种定量数据转换过程的正态性评估

D. Noel
{"title":"几种定量数据转换过程的正态性评估","authors":"D. Noel","doi":"10.19080/bboaj.2021.10.555786","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Usually, quantitative data standardization and/or normalization procedures requested in biological and as well in biomedical data analysis with the purpose to infer about linear regression relationship between processed variables and/or conditions. Here, we embarked to understand performance of quantitative data transformation systems in terms of reducing data variability as well as assessing data distribution normality by a computational statistic approach. For this purpose, we performed several multivariate descriptive and analytical statistical tests. Even if results shown drastic reduction of data variability by applying presently data transformation procedures, it is noteworthy to underline the relative opposite attitude of Exponential (Expo) data standardization system in that sense. In addition although, results revealed variance homogeneity for data processed by both Maximum and Logarithm data transformation methods, it is noteworthy to underline a relative variance homogeneity with regard data submitted to Box-Cox, Z-score, Minimum-Maximum and Square Root data transformation methods. Further, findings exhibited high aptitude of Square Root, Box-Cox and Logarithm quantitative data standardization methods, in stabilizing processed data variability. Interestingly, results shown high performances of Logarithm and Box-Cox data standardization systems in term of adjusting data normal distribution. In addition, multiple comparison of mean by Turkey contrast test suggested the high performance in term of data normality with regard Box-Cox standardization method. In conclusion, even if our results revealed heterogenic performances of presently processed quantitative data transformation methods, it is noteworthy to underline the high performances of both Box-Cox and Logarithm methods","PeriodicalId":72412,"journal":{"name":"Biostatistics and biometrics open access journal","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-02-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Normality Assessment of Several Quantitative Data Transformation Procedures\",\"authors\":\"D. Noel\",\"doi\":\"10.19080/bboaj.2021.10.555786\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Usually, quantitative data standardization and/or normalization procedures requested in biological and as well in biomedical data analysis with the purpose to infer about linear regression relationship between processed variables and/or conditions. Here, we embarked to understand performance of quantitative data transformation systems in terms of reducing data variability as well as assessing data distribution normality by a computational statistic approach. For this purpose, we performed several multivariate descriptive and analytical statistical tests. Even if results shown drastic reduction of data variability by applying presently data transformation procedures, it is noteworthy to underline the relative opposite attitude of Exponential (Expo) data standardization system in that sense. In addition although, results revealed variance homogeneity for data processed by both Maximum and Logarithm data transformation methods, it is noteworthy to underline a relative variance homogeneity with regard data submitted to Box-Cox, Z-score, Minimum-Maximum and Square Root data transformation methods. Further, findings exhibited high aptitude of Square Root, Box-Cox and Logarithm quantitative data standardization methods, in stabilizing processed data variability. Interestingly, results shown high performances of Logarithm and Box-Cox data standardization systems in term of adjusting data normal distribution. In addition, multiple comparison of mean by Turkey contrast test suggested the high performance in term of data normality with regard Box-Cox standardization method. In conclusion, even if our results revealed heterogenic performances of presently processed quantitative data transformation methods, it is noteworthy to underline the high performances of both Box-Cox and Logarithm methods\",\"PeriodicalId\":72412,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biostatistics and biometrics open access journal\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-02-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biostatistics and biometrics open access journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.19080/bboaj.2021.10.555786\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biostatistics and biometrics open access journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.19080/bboaj.2021.10.555786","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

通常,在生物和生物医学数据分析中需要定量数据标准化和/或规范化程序,目的是推断处理变量和/或条件之间的线性回归关系。在这里,我们开始了解定量数据转换系统在减少数据可变性以及通过计算统计方法评估数据分布正态性方面的性能。为此,我们进行了几个多变量描述性和分析性统计检验。即使结果表明,通过应用当前的数据转换程序,数据变异性急剧减少,值得注意的是,在这个意义上强调指数(Expo)数据标准化系统的相对相反的态度。此外,尽管结果显示了最大值和对数数据转换方法处理的数据的方差同质性,但值得注意的是,对于提交给Box-Cox, Z-score,最小最大值和平方根数据转换方法的数据,强调了相对方差同质性。此外,研究结果显示,平方根、Box-Cox和对数定量数据标准化方法在稳定处理数据变异性方面具有很高的能力。有趣的是,结果显示对数和Box-Cox数据标准化系统在调整数据正态分布方面表现优异。此外,土耳其对比检验对均值的多重比较表明,Box-Cox标准化方法在数据正态性方面具有较高的性能。总之,尽管我们的研究结果揭示了目前处理的定量数据转换方法的异质性,但值得注意的是,Box-Cox和对数方法都具有很高的性能
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Normality Assessment of Several Quantitative Data Transformation Procedures
Usually, quantitative data standardization and/or normalization procedures requested in biological and as well in biomedical data analysis with the purpose to infer about linear regression relationship between processed variables and/or conditions. Here, we embarked to understand performance of quantitative data transformation systems in terms of reducing data variability as well as assessing data distribution normality by a computational statistic approach. For this purpose, we performed several multivariate descriptive and analytical statistical tests. Even if results shown drastic reduction of data variability by applying presently data transformation procedures, it is noteworthy to underline the relative opposite attitude of Exponential (Expo) data standardization system in that sense. In addition although, results revealed variance homogeneity for data processed by both Maximum and Logarithm data transformation methods, it is noteworthy to underline a relative variance homogeneity with regard data submitted to Box-Cox, Z-score, Minimum-Maximum and Square Root data transformation methods. Further, findings exhibited high aptitude of Square Root, Box-Cox and Logarithm quantitative data standardization methods, in stabilizing processed data variability. Interestingly, results shown high performances of Logarithm and Box-Cox data standardization systems in term of adjusting data normal distribution. In addition, multiple comparison of mean by Turkey contrast test suggested the high performance in term of data normality with regard Box-Cox standardization method. In conclusion, even if our results revealed heterogenic performances of presently processed quantitative data transformation methods, it is noteworthy to underline the high performances of both Box-Cox and Logarithm methods
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信