走向角落的历史

Q1 Arts and Humanities
Daniel Jütte
{"title":"走向角落的历史","authors":"Daniel Jütte","doi":"10.1086/708675","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"There aren’t many corners of the past that remain unexplored. The history of the corner is one of them. To the best of my knowledge, no one has yet probed this chapter in the history of the built environment. Until recently, I didn’t think I would. Moving to New York City changed that. New York is perhaps the quintessential “city of corners.” In this essay, I’d like to offer some observations from the perspective of a cultural historian. Specifically, two avenues of inquiry intersect in this piece: it explores the history of the corner as a spatial object shaped by human design, but it also probes the agency of corners—that is, how they have shaped the ways in which people use and imagine the built environment. Two objections may be raised against my approach. For one thing, this piece mixes sources that some might argue should not be mixed: historical and literary texts, artistic and scholarly material, and personal and “objective” observations. For another, the piece doesn’t proceed in a strictly chronological fashion. In fact, not all periods of history will be treated with the same degree of detail: I will elaborate on some and only touch on others. The pragmatic reason is that this piece is merely an essay outlining the contours of a topic not yet studied. But perhaps a slightly unconventional approach might also suit an object that is, by definition, not straight, but bent. After all, would anyone really argue that a unifying thread or teleology is waiting to be uncovered in the history of the corner? There may be certain patterns or tendencies in this history, and I will try to elaborate on some of these constellations. Still, this essay remains preliminary and, to some extent, experimental—an experiment to determine whether it is possible to extract history from the corner of conventional disciplinary narratives. It is the historian’s inclination, but sometimes also his limitation, to look for avenues and “turning points” in the tangle that is the past—that is, to look for stories that can be mapped onto a grid of chronological progression","PeriodicalId":39613,"journal":{"name":"Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics","volume":"73-74 1","pages":"340 - 356"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/708675","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Toward a history of the corner\",\"authors\":\"Daniel Jütte\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/708675\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"There aren’t many corners of the past that remain unexplored. The history of the corner is one of them. To the best of my knowledge, no one has yet probed this chapter in the history of the built environment. Until recently, I didn’t think I would. Moving to New York City changed that. New York is perhaps the quintessential “city of corners.” In this essay, I’d like to offer some observations from the perspective of a cultural historian. Specifically, two avenues of inquiry intersect in this piece: it explores the history of the corner as a spatial object shaped by human design, but it also probes the agency of corners—that is, how they have shaped the ways in which people use and imagine the built environment. Two objections may be raised against my approach. For one thing, this piece mixes sources that some might argue should not be mixed: historical and literary texts, artistic and scholarly material, and personal and “objective” observations. For another, the piece doesn’t proceed in a strictly chronological fashion. In fact, not all periods of history will be treated with the same degree of detail: I will elaborate on some and only touch on others. The pragmatic reason is that this piece is merely an essay outlining the contours of a topic not yet studied. But perhaps a slightly unconventional approach might also suit an object that is, by definition, not straight, but bent. After all, would anyone really argue that a unifying thread or teleology is waiting to be uncovered in the history of the corner? There may be certain patterns or tendencies in this history, and I will try to elaborate on some of these constellations. Still, this essay remains preliminary and, to some extent, experimental—an experiment to determine whether it is possible to extract history from the corner of conventional disciplinary narratives. It is the historian’s inclination, but sometimes also his limitation, to look for avenues and “turning points” in the tangle that is the past—that is, to look for stories that can be mapped onto a grid of chronological progression\",\"PeriodicalId\":39613,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics\",\"volume\":\"73-74 1\",\"pages\":\"340 - 356\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/708675\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/708675\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/708675","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

过去没有多少角落是未被探索的。角落的历史就是其中之一。据我所知,在建筑环境史上,还没有人探究过这一章。直到最近,我才想到我会。搬到纽约改变了这一点。纽约也许是典型的“角落之城”。在这篇文章中,我想从文化历史学家的角度提供一些观察。具体来说,这篇文章有两条探索途径:它探索了角落作为人类设计塑造的空间对象的历史,但也探讨了角落的作用——也就是说,它们是如何塑造人们使用和想象建筑环境的方式的。对我的做法可能会有两种反对意见。首先,这篇文章混合了一些人可能认为不应该混合的来源:历史和文学文本、艺术和学术材料,以及个人和“客观”观察。另一方面,这件作品并没有严格按照时间顺序进行。事实上,并不是所有的历史时期都会被同等程度的细节对待:我会详细阐述一些,而只触及其他。务实的原因是,这篇文章只是一篇概述尚未研究的主题轮廓的文章。但是,也许一种稍微非传统的方法也可能适合一个根据定义不是直的,而是弯曲的物体。毕竟,有人真的会认为,在角落的历史中,一条统一的线索或目的论正在等待被揭开吗?在这段历史中可能存在某些模式或趋势,我将尝试详细介绍其中的一些星座。尽管如此,这篇文章仍然是初步的,在某种程度上是实验性的——这是一项确定是否有可能从传统学科叙事中提取历史的实验。历史学家倾向于,但有时也有局限性,在过去的混乱中寻找途径和“转折点”——也就是说,寻找可以映射到时间序列网格上的故事
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Toward a history of the corner
There aren’t many corners of the past that remain unexplored. The history of the corner is one of them. To the best of my knowledge, no one has yet probed this chapter in the history of the built environment. Until recently, I didn’t think I would. Moving to New York City changed that. New York is perhaps the quintessential “city of corners.” In this essay, I’d like to offer some observations from the perspective of a cultural historian. Specifically, two avenues of inquiry intersect in this piece: it explores the history of the corner as a spatial object shaped by human design, but it also probes the agency of corners—that is, how they have shaped the ways in which people use and imagine the built environment. Two objections may be raised against my approach. For one thing, this piece mixes sources that some might argue should not be mixed: historical and literary texts, artistic and scholarly material, and personal and “objective” observations. For another, the piece doesn’t proceed in a strictly chronological fashion. In fact, not all periods of history will be treated with the same degree of detail: I will elaborate on some and only touch on others. The pragmatic reason is that this piece is merely an essay outlining the contours of a topic not yet studied. But perhaps a slightly unconventional approach might also suit an object that is, by definition, not straight, but bent. After all, would anyone really argue that a unifying thread or teleology is waiting to be uncovered in the history of the corner? There may be certain patterns or tendencies in this history, and I will try to elaborate on some of these constellations. Still, this essay remains preliminary and, to some extent, experimental—an experiment to determine whether it is possible to extract history from the corner of conventional disciplinary narratives. It is the historian’s inclination, but sometimes also his limitation, to look for avenues and “turning points” in the tangle that is the past—that is, to look for stories that can be mapped onto a grid of chronological progression
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics
Res: Anthropology and Aesthetics Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: Res is a journal of anthropology and comparative aesthetics dedicated to the study of the object, in particular cult and belief objects and objects of art. The journal brings together, in an anthropological perspective, contributions by philosophers, art historians, archaeologists, critics, linguists, architects, artists, and others. Its field of inquiry is open to all cultures, regions, and historical periods. Res also seeks to make available textual and iconographic documents of importance for the history and theory of the arts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信