目的探讨富血小板血浆(PRP)注射治疗膝关节退行性病变的疗效;一项随机盲法研究

Q3 Medicine
M. Mardani-Kivi, Ehsan Kazemnejad Leili, Somaye Esnaashari, K. Hashemi-Motlagh, Zoleikha Azari
{"title":"目的探讨富血小板血浆(PRP)注射治疗膝关节退行性病变的疗效;一项随机盲法研究","authors":"M. Mardani-Kivi, Ehsan Kazemnejad Leili, Somaye Esnaashari, K. Hashemi-Motlagh, Zoleikha Azari","doi":"10.5812/asjsm-120485","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: To investigate the therapeutic effects of PRP injection + conservative treatment as the intervention group versus normal saline injection + conservative treatment as the control group. Objectives: This study we determined the effects of underlying factors, including age, gender, and Body Mass Index (BMI), on the therapeutic effects of PRP. Methods: In this single-blinded randomized clinical trial, 60 patients with grade 2 knee OA with an age of 40 - 65 years were enrolled. In the intervention group, leukocyte-poor PRP with double spinning, and in the control group, normal saline was injected with a similar protocol. All patients in both groups were also provided with a conservative protocol, including oral celecoxib 100 mg BID for four weeks, modifying physical activity, and 15 sessions of physiotherapy. Results: Demographic characteristics (age, gender, and BMI) and pre-treatment scores were similar between the two groups (all P > 0.05). The WOMAC score was improved from pre-treatment to first week post-treatment in both groups (from 54.89 ± 3.4 to 64.9 ± 3.7 in the intervention group and from 53.7 ± 3.1 to 63.8 ± 3.9 in the control group). It means that PRP + conservative treatment was effective, similar to normal saline + conservative treatment. After adjusting BMI as an underlying variable, it was indicated that in the patients with lower BMI, PRP + conservative provided a better outcome in comparison to saline + conservative treatment (P = 0.014 and P = 0.019, respectively). Also, the comparison of functional scores changes with age as an underlying variable, demonstrating that younger cases obtained a better response from PRP + conservative rather than normal saline + conservative (P = 0.012 and P = 0.007, respectively). Conclusions: PRP seems to be an appropriate choice for treatment of moderate osteoarthritis, especially in younger patients and those with lower BMI.","PeriodicalId":8847,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Sports Medicine","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-03-04","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Relationship Between the Underlying Factors and the Treatment Results of Platelet-Rich Plasm (PRP) Injection in Degenerative Knee Disease; A Blinded Randomized Study\",\"authors\":\"M. Mardani-Kivi, Ehsan Kazemnejad Leili, Somaye Esnaashari, K. Hashemi-Motlagh, Zoleikha Azari\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/asjsm-120485\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: To investigate the therapeutic effects of PRP injection + conservative treatment as the intervention group versus normal saline injection + conservative treatment as the control group. Objectives: This study we determined the effects of underlying factors, including age, gender, and Body Mass Index (BMI), on the therapeutic effects of PRP. Methods: In this single-blinded randomized clinical trial, 60 patients with grade 2 knee OA with an age of 40 - 65 years were enrolled. In the intervention group, leukocyte-poor PRP with double spinning, and in the control group, normal saline was injected with a similar protocol. All patients in both groups were also provided with a conservative protocol, including oral celecoxib 100 mg BID for four weeks, modifying physical activity, and 15 sessions of physiotherapy. Results: Demographic characteristics (age, gender, and BMI) and pre-treatment scores were similar between the two groups (all P > 0.05). The WOMAC score was improved from pre-treatment to first week post-treatment in both groups (from 54.89 ± 3.4 to 64.9 ± 3.7 in the intervention group and from 53.7 ± 3.1 to 63.8 ± 3.9 in the control group). It means that PRP + conservative treatment was effective, similar to normal saline + conservative treatment. After adjusting BMI as an underlying variable, it was indicated that in the patients with lower BMI, PRP + conservative provided a better outcome in comparison to saline + conservative treatment (P = 0.014 and P = 0.019, respectively). Also, the comparison of functional scores changes with age as an underlying variable, demonstrating that younger cases obtained a better response from PRP + conservative rather than normal saline + conservative (P = 0.012 and P = 0.007, respectively). Conclusions: PRP seems to be an appropriate choice for treatment of moderate osteoarthritis, especially in younger patients and those with lower BMI.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8847,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-03-04\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Sports Medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/asjsm-120485\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Sports Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/asjsm-120485","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:观察PRP注射液+保守治疗作为干预组与生理盐水注射液+保守疗法作为对照组的疗效。目的:本研究确定了包括年龄、性别和体重指数(BMI)在内的潜在因素对PRP治疗效果的影响。方法:在这项单盲随机临床试验中,60名年龄在40-65岁的2级膝关节骨性关节炎患者被纳入研究。在干预组中,白细胞贫乏的PRP采用双旋,在对照组中,用类似的方案注射生理盐水。两组的所有患者也接受了保守方案,包括口服塞来昔布100 mg BID,持续四周,调整体力活动,以及15次物理治疗。结果:两组的人口学特征(年龄、性别和BMI)和治疗前评分相似(均P>0.05)。两组的WOMAC评分从治疗前到治疗后第一周均有改善(干预组从54.89±3.4提高到64.9±3.7,对照组从53.7±3.1提高到63.8±3.9)。这意味着PRP+保守治疗是有效的,类似于生理盐水+保守治疗。在将BMI作为一个潜在变量进行调整后,研究表明,在BMI较低的患者中,与生理盐水+保守治疗相比,PRP+保守治疗提供了更好的结果(分别为P=0.014和P=0.019)。此外,功能评分的比较随着年龄作为一个潜在变量而变化,表明年轻病例从PRP+保守治疗中获得的反应比生理盐水+保守治疗更好(分别为P=0.012和P=0.007)。结论:PRP似乎是治疗中度骨关节炎的合适选择,尤其是在年轻患者和BMI较低的患者中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Relationship Between the Underlying Factors and the Treatment Results of Platelet-Rich Plasm (PRP) Injection in Degenerative Knee Disease; A Blinded Randomized Study
Background: To investigate the therapeutic effects of PRP injection + conservative treatment as the intervention group versus normal saline injection + conservative treatment as the control group. Objectives: This study we determined the effects of underlying factors, including age, gender, and Body Mass Index (BMI), on the therapeutic effects of PRP. Methods: In this single-blinded randomized clinical trial, 60 patients with grade 2 knee OA with an age of 40 - 65 years were enrolled. In the intervention group, leukocyte-poor PRP with double spinning, and in the control group, normal saline was injected with a similar protocol. All patients in both groups were also provided with a conservative protocol, including oral celecoxib 100 mg BID for four weeks, modifying physical activity, and 15 sessions of physiotherapy. Results: Demographic characteristics (age, gender, and BMI) and pre-treatment scores were similar between the two groups (all P > 0.05). The WOMAC score was improved from pre-treatment to first week post-treatment in both groups (from 54.89 ± 3.4 to 64.9 ± 3.7 in the intervention group and from 53.7 ± 3.1 to 63.8 ± 3.9 in the control group). It means that PRP + conservative treatment was effective, similar to normal saline + conservative treatment. After adjusting BMI as an underlying variable, it was indicated that in the patients with lower BMI, PRP + conservative provided a better outcome in comparison to saline + conservative treatment (P = 0.014 and P = 0.019, respectively). Also, the comparison of functional scores changes with age as an underlying variable, demonstrating that younger cases obtained a better response from PRP + conservative rather than normal saline + conservative (P = 0.012 and P = 0.007, respectively). Conclusions: PRP seems to be an appropriate choice for treatment of moderate osteoarthritis, especially in younger patients and those with lower BMI.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Asian Journal of Sports Medicine
Asian Journal of Sports Medicine Medicine-Orthopedics and Sports Medicine
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
22
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信