垄断选择:酒精和其他药物管制的过时或“最佳购买”?

Q2 Arts and Humanities
R. Room
{"title":"垄断选择:酒精和其他药物管制的过时或“最佳购买”?","authors":"R. Room","doi":"10.1086/707513","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Given the attractive but problematic nature of psychoactive substances, legal markets in them are commonly subject to government controls, both as a source of revenue and to control levels of use and harm. One control option is government monopolization of all or part of the market. The diverse modern histories of monopolization for tobacco, opium, and alcohol are described, along with evidence on monopolies’ substantial effectiveness in raising revenue and in minimizing harms. Interests and arguments opposing monopolies are described. Monopolization has decreased in the neoliberal era, but the monopoly option has benefits for public health and the public interest.","PeriodicalId":53627,"journal":{"name":"The social history of alcohol and drugs","volume":"34 1","pages":"215 - 232"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/707513","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Monopoly Option: Obsolescent or a “Best Buy” in Alcohol and Other Drug Control?\",\"authors\":\"R. Room\",\"doi\":\"10.1086/707513\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Given the attractive but problematic nature of psychoactive substances, legal markets in them are commonly subject to government controls, both as a source of revenue and to control levels of use and harm. One control option is government monopolization of all or part of the market. The diverse modern histories of monopolization for tobacco, opium, and alcohol are described, along with evidence on monopolies’ substantial effectiveness in raising revenue and in minimizing harms. Interests and arguments opposing monopolies are described. Monopolization has decreased in the neoliberal era, but the monopoly option has benefits for public health and the public interest.\",\"PeriodicalId\":53627,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The social history of alcohol and drugs\",\"volume\":\"34 1\",\"pages\":\"215 - 232\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1086/707513\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The social history of alcohol and drugs\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1086/707513\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The social history of alcohol and drugs","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1086/707513","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

鉴于精神活性物质具有吸引力但有问题的性质,这些物质的合法市场通常受到政府的管制,既是作为收入来源,也是为了控制使用和危害程度。一种控制选择是政府垄断全部或部分市场。描述了烟草、鸦片和酒精垄断的不同现代历史,以及垄断在增加收入和减少危害方面的巨大有效性的证据。描述了反对垄断的利益和论据。在新自由主义时代,垄断已经减少,但垄断的选择有利于公共健康和公共利益。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
The Monopoly Option: Obsolescent or a “Best Buy” in Alcohol and Other Drug Control?
Given the attractive but problematic nature of psychoactive substances, legal markets in them are commonly subject to government controls, both as a source of revenue and to control levels of use and harm. One control option is government monopolization of all or part of the market. The diverse modern histories of monopolization for tobacco, opium, and alcohol are described, along with evidence on monopolies’ substantial effectiveness in raising revenue and in minimizing harms. Interests and arguments opposing monopolies are described. Monopolization has decreased in the neoliberal era, but the monopoly option has benefits for public health and the public interest.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
The social history of alcohol and drugs
The social history of alcohol and drugs Arts and Humanities-History
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信