{"title":"参与有争议的社区问题","authors":"Natalie J. Dollar","doi":"10.1075/LD.00087.DOL","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n This article presents an analysis of dialogue as an alternative to debate and argument for engaging contested community\n issues. Treating dialogue as a communication practice, I draw on ethnography of communication, cultural communication theory, and cultural\n discourse analysis to describe and interpret how participants practiced community dialogue as a communication event comprised of sequences\n of listening and verbally responding. When topics and identities were elaborated upon and socially negotiated through personal communication\n in the form of narratives and emotional responses, participants reported effective dialogue. These sequences were dialogic moments partially\n due to the dialectical tension between Americans’ once predictable civic routine of public expression of individual’s beliefs and the\n process of dialogue featured in our War and Peace dialogue workshop.","PeriodicalId":42318,"journal":{"name":"Language and Dialogue","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Engaging contested community issues\",\"authors\":\"Natalie J. Dollar\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/LD.00087.DOL\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n This article presents an analysis of dialogue as an alternative to debate and argument for engaging contested community\\n issues. Treating dialogue as a communication practice, I draw on ethnography of communication, cultural communication theory, and cultural\\n discourse analysis to describe and interpret how participants practiced community dialogue as a communication event comprised of sequences\\n of listening and verbally responding. When topics and identities were elaborated upon and socially negotiated through personal communication\\n in the form of narratives and emotional responses, participants reported effective dialogue. These sequences were dialogic moments partially\\n due to the dialectical tension between Americans’ once predictable civic routine of public expression of individual’s beliefs and the\\n process of dialogue featured in our War and Peace dialogue workshop.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language and Dialogue\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language and Dialogue\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/LD.00087.DOL\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and Dialogue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/LD.00087.DOL","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
This article presents an analysis of dialogue as an alternative to debate and argument for engaging contested community
issues. Treating dialogue as a communication practice, I draw on ethnography of communication, cultural communication theory, and cultural
discourse analysis to describe and interpret how participants practiced community dialogue as a communication event comprised of sequences
of listening and verbally responding. When topics and identities were elaborated upon and socially negotiated through personal communication
in the form of narratives and emotional responses, participants reported effective dialogue. These sequences were dialogic moments partially
due to the dialectical tension between Americans’ once predictable civic routine of public expression of individual’s beliefs and the
process of dialogue featured in our War and Peace dialogue workshop.
期刊介绍:
In our post-Cartesian times human abilities are regarded as integrated and interacting abilities. Speaking, thinking, perceiving, having emotions need to be studied in interaction. Integration and interaction take place in dialogue. Scholars are called upon to go beyond reductive methods of abstraction and division and to take up the challenge of coming to terms with the complex whole. The conclusions drawn from reasoning about human behaviour in the humanities and social sciences have finally been proven by experiments in the natural sciences, especially neurology and sociobiology. What happens in the black box, can now, at least in part, be made visible. The journal intends to be an explicitly interdisciplinary journal reaching out to any discipline dealing with human abilities on the basis of consilience or the unity of knowledge. It is the challenge of post-Cartesian science to tackle the issue of how body, mind and language are interconnected and dialogically put to action. The journal invites papers which deal with ‘language and dialogue’ as an integrated whole in different languages and cultures and in different areas: everyday, institutional and literary, in theory and in practice, in business, in court, in the media, in politics and academia. In particular the humanities and social sciences are addressed: linguistics, literary studies, pragmatics, dialogue analysis, communication and cultural studies, applied linguistics, business studies, media studies, studies of language and the law, philosophy, psychology, cognitive sciences, sociology, anthropology and others. The journal Language and Dialogue is a peer reviewed journal and associated with the book series Dialogue Studies, edited by Edda Weigand.