在实施强化教育课程中处于弱势地位的儿童

Thyge Tegtmejer, Janni Tofte Langerhuus, Kim Jerg, K. Nielsen, Morten Huusfeldt, Lasse Stenmann Ellebæk
{"title":"在实施强化教育课程中处于弱势地位的儿童","authors":"Thyge Tegtmejer, Janni Tofte Langerhuus, Kim Jerg, K. Nielsen, Morten Huusfeldt, Lasse Stenmann Ellebæk","doi":"10.7146/tfp.v17i33.129170","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The strengthened pedagogical curriculum is by various parties presented as a movement away from a narrow focus on educational output with measurements of children’s progress and capabilities. Because of this, accompanying legal frameworks contains a distancing to criticized time-consuming documentation requirements set for day care professionals’ work. However, before as well as after the legislative change, municipal administrations of day care have an obligation to secure measures towards children in vulnerable positions. In this study, we examine the implementation of the strengthened pedagogical curriculum in four municipalities, with a focus on municipal decisions in regards to children in vulnerable positions. The main conclusion is that all municipalities choose to maintain tools to measure and describe all children’s learning and progress, and that this is done with reference to children in vulnerable positions. The study discusses a basic pedagogical dilemma between, on the one hand, making individual children’s challenges visible – and thus risking that children will be met by focus at their deficiency. And, on the other hand, refraining from pointing out challenges – and, because of that, risking that special needs will not be met and competencies needed in school and life will not be sufficiently developed.","PeriodicalId":32373,"journal":{"name":"Tidsskrift for Professionsstudier","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Børn i udsatte positioner i implementeringen af Den styrkede pædagogiske læreplan\",\"authors\":\"Thyge Tegtmejer, Janni Tofte Langerhuus, Kim Jerg, K. Nielsen, Morten Huusfeldt, Lasse Stenmann Ellebæk\",\"doi\":\"10.7146/tfp.v17i33.129170\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The strengthened pedagogical curriculum is by various parties presented as a movement away from a narrow focus on educational output with measurements of children’s progress and capabilities. Because of this, accompanying legal frameworks contains a distancing to criticized time-consuming documentation requirements set for day care professionals’ work. However, before as well as after the legislative change, municipal administrations of day care have an obligation to secure measures towards children in vulnerable positions. In this study, we examine the implementation of the strengthened pedagogical curriculum in four municipalities, with a focus on municipal decisions in regards to children in vulnerable positions. The main conclusion is that all municipalities choose to maintain tools to measure and describe all children’s learning and progress, and that this is done with reference to children in vulnerable positions. The study discusses a basic pedagogical dilemma between, on the one hand, making individual children’s challenges visible – and thus risking that children will be met by focus at their deficiency. And, on the other hand, refraining from pointing out challenges – and, because of that, risking that special needs will not be met and competencies needed in school and life will not be sufficiently developed.\",\"PeriodicalId\":32373,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tidsskrift for Professionsstudier\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-10-29\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tidsskrift for Professionsstudier\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7146/tfp.v17i33.129170\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tidsskrift for Professionsstudier","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/tfp.v17i33.129170","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

各方认为,强化的教学课程是一种运动,不再狭隘地关注教育产出,而是衡量儿童的进步和能力。正因为如此,相关的法律框架与备受批评的日托专业人员工作耗时的文件要求保持距离。然而,在立法改革之前和之后,市政日托管理部门都有义务确保对处于弱势地位的儿童采取措施。在这项研究中,我们审查了四个市镇强化教学课程的实施情况,重点是市镇关于弱势儿童的决定。主要结论是,所有市政当局都选择保留衡量和描述所有儿童学习和进步的工具,这是针对弱势儿童的。这项研究讨论了一个基本的教学困境,一方面,让孩子们的挑战显而易见,另一方面,孩子们可能会因为关注自己的不足而受到挑战。另一方面,避免指出挑战——正因为如此,冒着特殊需求得不到满足、学校和生活所需能力得不到充分发展的风险。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Børn i udsatte positioner i implementeringen af Den styrkede pædagogiske læreplan
The strengthened pedagogical curriculum is by various parties presented as a movement away from a narrow focus on educational output with measurements of children’s progress and capabilities. Because of this, accompanying legal frameworks contains a distancing to criticized time-consuming documentation requirements set for day care professionals’ work. However, before as well as after the legislative change, municipal administrations of day care have an obligation to secure measures towards children in vulnerable positions. In this study, we examine the implementation of the strengthened pedagogical curriculum in four municipalities, with a focus on municipal decisions in regards to children in vulnerable positions. The main conclusion is that all municipalities choose to maintain tools to measure and describe all children’s learning and progress, and that this is done with reference to children in vulnerable positions. The study discusses a basic pedagogical dilemma between, on the one hand, making individual children’s challenges visible – and thus risking that children will be met by focus at their deficiency. And, on the other hand, refraining from pointing out challenges – and, because of that, risking that special needs will not be met and competencies needed in school and life will not be sufficiently developed.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
21
审稿时长
12 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信