惊悚的模糊与纯粹的抽象:瑞典书信与爱伦·坡的图形性

IF 0.2 0 LITERATURE, AMERICAN
Devin Zuber
{"title":"惊悚的模糊与纯粹的抽象:瑞典书信与爱伦·坡的图形性","authors":"Devin Zuber","doi":"10.5325/edgallpoerev.22.1.0142","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:If we are to position Poe's concept of \"graphicality\" as hovering at the juncture between the verbal and the visual—a gesture toward painting at the same time that it indicates a literary art of description, or ekphrasis—criticism has tended to overlook the centrality of Emanuel Swedenborg's so-called \"doctrine of correspondences\" within American art discourses of the 1830s and '40s. This essay explores the corresponding Swedenborgian valences behind Poe's own graphicality, putting his work in context of three critical figures in Poe's orbit who respectively mediated, to one degree or another, Swedenborgian theories: George Bush, the mesmerist and New York University professor of Hebrew and Oriental languages; Thomas Holley Chivers, the southern poet, and close friend of Poe's; and finally, Christopher Pearse Cranch, the landscape painter. The essay concludes with a brief close reading of Poe's iconic tale \"The Fall of the House of Usher,\" the only published work in Poe which explicitly mentions a book by Swedenborg (his \"spiritualist\" classic from 1758, Heaven and Hell).","PeriodicalId":40986,"journal":{"name":"Edgar Allan Poe Review","volume":"22 1","pages":"142 - 166"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Thrilling Vagueness and Pure Abstractions: Swedenborgian Correspondence and Edgar Allan Poe's Graphicality\",\"authors\":\"Devin Zuber\",\"doi\":\"10.5325/edgallpoerev.22.1.0142\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract:If we are to position Poe's concept of \\\"graphicality\\\" as hovering at the juncture between the verbal and the visual—a gesture toward painting at the same time that it indicates a literary art of description, or ekphrasis—criticism has tended to overlook the centrality of Emanuel Swedenborg's so-called \\\"doctrine of correspondences\\\" within American art discourses of the 1830s and '40s. This essay explores the corresponding Swedenborgian valences behind Poe's own graphicality, putting his work in context of three critical figures in Poe's orbit who respectively mediated, to one degree or another, Swedenborgian theories: George Bush, the mesmerist and New York University professor of Hebrew and Oriental languages; Thomas Holley Chivers, the southern poet, and close friend of Poe's; and finally, Christopher Pearse Cranch, the landscape painter. The essay concludes with a brief close reading of Poe's iconic tale \\\"The Fall of the House of Usher,\\\" the only published work in Poe which explicitly mentions a book by Swedenborg (his \\\"spiritualist\\\" classic from 1758, Heaven and Hell).\",\"PeriodicalId\":40986,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Edgar Allan Poe Review\",\"volume\":\"22 1\",\"pages\":\"142 - 166\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Edgar Allan Poe Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5325/edgallpoerev.22.1.0142\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LITERATURE, AMERICAN\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Edgar Allan Poe Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5325/edgallpoerev.22.1.0142","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LITERATURE, AMERICAN","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:如果我们把爱伦·坡的“图形化”概念定位于语言和视觉之间的交界处——一种对绘画的姿态,同时它表明了一种描述的文学艺术,或术语——批评往往会忽视伊曼纽尔·斯威登堡所谓的“对应主义”在19世纪30年代和40年代美国艺术话语中的中心地位。本文探讨了坡的图形性背后相应的斯威登堡理论,并将他的作品置于坡的轨道上的三个关键人物的背景下,他们分别在某种程度上调解了斯威登堡理论:乔治·布什,催眠术家和纽约大学希伯来语和东方语言教授;托马斯·霍利·奇弗斯,南方诗人,坡的密友;最后是风景画家克里斯托弗·皮尔斯·克兰奇。这篇文章最后简短地仔细阅读了坡的标志性故事《厄舍屋的倒塌》,这是坡唯一一部明确提到斯威登堡(他1758年的“唯心主义”经典作品《天堂与地狱》)的作品。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Thrilling Vagueness and Pure Abstractions: Swedenborgian Correspondence and Edgar Allan Poe's Graphicality
Abstract:If we are to position Poe's concept of "graphicality" as hovering at the juncture between the verbal and the visual—a gesture toward painting at the same time that it indicates a literary art of description, or ekphrasis—criticism has tended to overlook the centrality of Emanuel Swedenborg's so-called "doctrine of correspondences" within American art discourses of the 1830s and '40s. This essay explores the corresponding Swedenborgian valences behind Poe's own graphicality, putting his work in context of three critical figures in Poe's orbit who respectively mediated, to one degree or another, Swedenborgian theories: George Bush, the mesmerist and New York University professor of Hebrew and Oriental languages; Thomas Holley Chivers, the southern poet, and close friend of Poe's; and finally, Christopher Pearse Cranch, the landscape painter. The essay concludes with a brief close reading of Poe's iconic tale "The Fall of the House of Usher," the only published work in Poe which explicitly mentions a book by Swedenborg (his "spiritualist" classic from 1758, Heaven and Hell).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Edgar Allan Poe Review
Edgar Allan Poe Review LITERATURE, AMERICAN-
CiteScore
0.20
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Edgar Allan Poe Review publishes scholarly essays on and creative responses to Edgar Allan Poe, his life, works, and influence and provides a forum for the informal exchange of information on Poe-related events.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信