J. Kayembe, D. Ishoso, Christian Mbongopasi, Don Jethro Mavungu, Jean René Makulo, S. Mukendi, Nsengi Y Ntamabyaliro, R. J. Matangila, J. Muyembe
{"title":"我们使用羟氯喹和阿奇霉素治疗COVID-19的经验:一项来自刚果民主共和国金沙萨的观察性研究","authors":"J. Kayembe, D. Ishoso, Christian Mbongopasi, Don Jethro Mavungu, Jean René Makulo, S. Mukendi, Nsengi Y Ntamabyaliro, R. J. Matangila, J. Muyembe","doi":"10.31579/2692-9406/065","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Up to now COVID-19 treatment is a matter of great debate. Several trials and observational studies have brought conflicting results regarding the efficacy of some repurposed drugs suggested treating COVID-19, stressing the need for further research. Objective: This study aimed to add to the existing literature, some evidence on the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and azithromycin (AZ) as suggested drugs for COVID-19 treatment. Materials and Methods: This observational study reports the experience of conventional treatment (CT) combining HCQ plus AZ applied in the Democratic Republic of Congo. We compared epidemiological and clinical data between 1,100 (89%) subjects submitted to the CT and 135 (11%) who did not receive the CT. Survival analyses including Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression were used to determine the clinical progress at day 10 and the survival likelihood at day 15, from the treatment initiation date. Results: Clinical outcome is much better in the CT group on D10 than in the comparison group (p=0.001). The adverse effects reported are minor and equivalent in both groups (3% vs 3%). Conclusion: This preliminary observational study suggests a beneficial and safe effect of conventional treatment in our country and justifies the continuation of this therapeutic protocol at this time. However, larger analytical studies with more robust evaluation criteria are needed to strengthen the power of observations.","PeriodicalId":72392,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical research and clinical reviews","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Our experience of using Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin in the treatment of COVID-19: an observational study from Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo\",\"authors\":\"J. Kayembe, D. Ishoso, Christian Mbongopasi, Don Jethro Mavungu, Jean René Makulo, S. Mukendi, Nsengi Y Ntamabyaliro, R. J. Matangila, J. Muyembe\",\"doi\":\"10.31579/2692-9406/065\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Up to now COVID-19 treatment is a matter of great debate. Several trials and observational studies have brought conflicting results regarding the efficacy of some repurposed drugs suggested treating COVID-19, stressing the need for further research. Objective: This study aimed to add to the existing literature, some evidence on the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and azithromycin (AZ) as suggested drugs for COVID-19 treatment. Materials and Methods: This observational study reports the experience of conventional treatment (CT) combining HCQ plus AZ applied in the Democratic Republic of Congo. We compared epidemiological and clinical data between 1,100 (89%) subjects submitted to the CT and 135 (11%) who did not receive the CT. Survival analyses including Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression were used to determine the clinical progress at day 10 and the survival likelihood at day 15, from the treatment initiation date. Results: Clinical outcome is much better in the CT group on D10 than in the comparison group (p=0.001). The adverse effects reported are minor and equivalent in both groups (3% vs 3%). Conclusion: This preliminary observational study suggests a beneficial and safe effect of conventional treatment in our country and justifies the continuation of this therapeutic protocol at this time. However, larger analytical studies with more robust evaluation criteria are needed to strengthen the power of observations.\",\"PeriodicalId\":72392,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Biomedical research and clinical reviews\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Biomedical research and clinical reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9406/065\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical research and clinical reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.31579/2692-9406/065","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2
摘要
背景:到目前为止,COVID-19的治疗是一个有很大争议的问题。一些试验和观察性研究对一些用于治疗COVID-19的新用途药物的疗效得出了相互矛盾的结果,强调需要进一步研究。目的:本研究旨在在现有文献基础上补充羟氯喹(HCQ)和阿奇霉素(AZ)作为新冠肺炎推荐用药的有效性和安全性。材料与方法:本观察性研究报告了在刚果民主共和国应用HCQ + AZ联合常规治疗(CT)的经验。我们比较了1100名(89%)接受CT检查的受试者和135名(11%)未接受CT检查的受试者的流行病学和临床资料。使用Kaplan-Meier和Cox回归等生存分析来确定自治疗开始之日起第10天的临床进展和第15天的生存可能性。结果:D10 CT组临床预后明显优于对照组(p=0.001)。两组报告的不良反应轻微且相当(3% vs 3%)。结论:这项初步的观察性研究表明,在我国,常规治疗是有益的和安全的,并证明了在这个时候继续这种治疗方案是合理的。然而,需要更大的分析研究和更健全的评价标准来加强观察的力量。
Our experience of using Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin in the treatment of COVID-19: an observational study from Kinshasa, Democratic Republic of Congo
Background: Up to now COVID-19 treatment is a matter of great debate. Several trials and observational studies have brought conflicting results regarding the efficacy of some repurposed drugs suggested treating COVID-19, stressing the need for further research. Objective: This study aimed to add to the existing literature, some evidence on the efficacy and safety of hydroxychloroquine (HCQ) and azithromycin (AZ) as suggested drugs for COVID-19 treatment. Materials and Methods: This observational study reports the experience of conventional treatment (CT) combining HCQ plus AZ applied in the Democratic Republic of Congo. We compared epidemiological and clinical data between 1,100 (89%) subjects submitted to the CT and 135 (11%) who did not receive the CT. Survival analyses including Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression were used to determine the clinical progress at day 10 and the survival likelihood at day 15, from the treatment initiation date. Results: Clinical outcome is much better in the CT group on D10 than in the comparison group (p=0.001). The adverse effects reported are minor and equivalent in both groups (3% vs 3%). Conclusion: This preliminary observational study suggests a beneficial and safe effect of conventional treatment in our country and justifies the continuation of this therapeutic protocol at this time. However, larger analytical studies with more robust evaluation criteria are needed to strengthen the power of observations.