药效学图谱的可比性及其在同类研究中的应用

Jason J. Z. Liao, Yifang Li, Xinhua Jiang
{"title":"药效学图谱的可比性及其在同类研究中的应用","authors":"Jason J. Z. Liao, Yifang Li, Xinhua Jiang","doi":"10.4172/2155-6180.1000345","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It is often interest of comparing two pharmacodynamics (PD) profiles in drug development. Currently the common practice is borrowing the bioequivalence (BE) rule in pharmacokinetics analysis for pharmacodynamics comparison in terms of the area under the effect curve (AUEC) of the pharmacodynamics profile. However, this may not be a feasible and sensitive enough approach since the bioequivalence approach is based on the summarized parameter of the pharmacodynamics profile rather than on directly comparison of the whole pharmacodynamics profile. In this paper, a simple but efficient and pragmatic pharmacodynamics comparability index is proposed to evaluate the comparability of pharmacodynamics profiles by comparing the whole pharmacodynamics profiles directly. Different biological products have different variability and the CV% can be in a very large range. The PD comparability index can take account of the reference knowledge into consideration in assessment but the AUEC BE type approach ignores the reference variability. The good properties of the proposed approach are illustrated through simulated data and a real dataset.","PeriodicalId":87294,"journal":{"name":"Journal of biometrics & biostatistics","volume":"8 1","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2017-04-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2155-6180.1000345","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparability of Pharmacodynamics Profiles with an Application to aBiosimilar Study\",\"authors\":\"Jason J. Z. Liao, Yifang Li, Xinhua Jiang\",\"doi\":\"10.4172/2155-6180.1000345\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It is often interest of comparing two pharmacodynamics (PD) profiles in drug development. Currently the common practice is borrowing the bioequivalence (BE) rule in pharmacokinetics analysis for pharmacodynamics comparison in terms of the area under the effect curve (AUEC) of the pharmacodynamics profile. However, this may not be a feasible and sensitive enough approach since the bioequivalence approach is based on the summarized parameter of the pharmacodynamics profile rather than on directly comparison of the whole pharmacodynamics profile. In this paper, a simple but efficient and pragmatic pharmacodynamics comparability index is proposed to evaluate the comparability of pharmacodynamics profiles by comparing the whole pharmacodynamics profiles directly. Different biological products have different variability and the CV% can be in a very large range. The PD comparability index can take account of the reference knowledge into consideration in assessment but the AUEC BE type approach ignores the reference variability. The good properties of the proposed approach are illustrated through simulated data and a real dataset.\",\"PeriodicalId\":87294,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of biometrics & biostatistics\",\"volume\":\"8 1\",\"pages\":\"1-6\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2017-04-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.4172/2155-6180.1000345\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of biometrics & biostatistics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6180.1000345\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of biometrics & biostatistics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4172/2155-6180.1000345","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

在药物开发中,比较两种药效学(PD)谱通常是令人感兴趣的。目前的常见做法是借用药代动力学分析中的生物等效性(BE)规则,根据药效学图谱的效应曲线下面积(AUEC)进行药效学比较。然而,这可能不是一种可行且足够敏感的方法,因为生物等效性方法是基于药效学图谱的汇总参数,而不是基于整个药效学图谱直接比较。本文提出了一个简单、高效、实用的药效学可比性指标,通过直接比较整个药效学图谱来评价药效学图谱的可比性。不同的生物产物具有不同的可变性,并且CV%可以在非常大的范围内。PD可比性指数可以在评估中考虑参考知识,但AUEC BE型方法忽略了参考变异性。通过模拟数据和真实数据集说明了该方法的良好性能。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparability of Pharmacodynamics Profiles with an Application to aBiosimilar Study
It is often interest of comparing two pharmacodynamics (PD) profiles in drug development. Currently the common practice is borrowing the bioequivalence (BE) rule in pharmacokinetics analysis for pharmacodynamics comparison in terms of the area under the effect curve (AUEC) of the pharmacodynamics profile. However, this may not be a feasible and sensitive enough approach since the bioequivalence approach is based on the summarized parameter of the pharmacodynamics profile rather than on directly comparison of the whole pharmacodynamics profile. In this paper, a simple but efficient and pragmatic pharmacodynamics comparability index is proposed to evaluate the comparability of pharmacodynamics profiles by comparing the whole pharmacodynamics profiles directly. Different biological products have different variability and the CV% can be in a very large range. The PD comparability index can take account of the reference knowledge into consideration in assessment but the AUEC BE type approach ignores the reference variability. The good properties of the proposed approach are illustrated through simulated data and a real dataset.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信