“问题对我们来说太大了”:社区矫正伙伴关系的承诺和危险

Susan Dewey, R. Barry, Jennifer Hankel, Theresa Anasti, Susan Lockwood-Roberts, Brittany Gilmer, Matthew J. Dolliver
{"title":"“问题对我们来说太大了”:社区矫正伙伴关系的承诺和危险","authors":"Susan Dewey, R. Barry, Jennifer Hankel, Theresa Anasti, Susan Lockwood-Roberts, Brittany Gilmer, Matthew J. Dolliver","doi":"10.1080/23774657.2021.1936293","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The present study uses the results of semi-structured interviews and participant observation with non-uniformed correctional staff and administrators in eight U.S. state prison systems to examine community-corrections partnerships in the areas of education, vocational training, reentry preparation, and psychosocial wellbeing. Through analysis derived from literature on the “what works” movement in corrections, volunteerism in prison, and correctional outsourcing, our findings suggest that community-corrections partnerships can provide a sense of purpose and hope for incarcerated individuals, support reentry preparedness, and reestablish community connections. However, such partnerships also generate challenges related to institutional capacity, security, and conflicting interests. Our findings suggest that correctional staff and administrators should incorporate qualitative impact evaluation methods describing how and why programs work, adopt LEAN methods of volunteer management, and support a human services lens regarding staff roles.","PeriodicalId":91861,"journal":{"name":"Corrections : policy, practice and research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23774657.2021.1936293","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"“The Problem’s Too Big for Us”: The Promises and Perils of Community-Corrections Partnerships\",\"authors\":\"Susan Dewey, R. Barry, Jennifer Hankel, Theresa Anasti, Susan Lockwood-Roberts, Brittany Gilmer, Matthew J. Dolliver\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23774657.2021.1936293\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The present study uses the results of semi-structured interviews and participant observation with non-uniformed correctional staff and administrators in eight U.S. state prison systems to examine community-corrections partnerships in the areas of education, vocational training, reentry preparation, and psychosocial wellbeing. Through analysis derived from literature on the “what works” movement in corrections, volunteerism in prison, and correctional outsourcing, our findings suggest that community-corrections partnerships can provide a sense of purpose and hope for incarcerated individuals, support reentry preparedness, and reestablish community connections. However, such partnerships also generate challenges related to institutional capacity, security, and conflicting interests. Our findings suggest that correctional staff and administrators should incorporate qualitative impact evaluation methods describing how and why programs work, adopt LEAN methods of volunteer management, and support a human services lens regarding staff roles.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91861,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Corrections : policy, practice and research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-06-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/23774657.2021.1936293\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Corrections : policy, practice and research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2021.1936293\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Corrections : policy, practice and research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23774657.2021.1936293","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

本研究采用半结构化访谈和参与性观察的结果,对美国8个州监狱系统的非制服惩教人员和管理人员进行调查,以检查社区惩教在教育、职业培训、重返社会准备和社会心理健康方面的合作关系。通过对惩教中“什么有效”运动、监狱志愿服务和惩教外包的文献分析,我们的发现表明,社区惩教伙伴关系可以为被监禁的人提供一种目标感和希望,支持重返社会的准备,并重建社区联系。然而,这种伙伴关系也带来了与机构能力、安全和利益冲突有关的挑战。我们的研究结果表明,惩教人员和管理人员应该采用定性影响评估方法,描述项目如何以及为什么起作用,采用精益志愿者管理方法,并支持关于工作人员角色的人类服务视角。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
“The Problem’s Too Big for Us”: The Promises and Perils of Community-Corrections Partnerships
ABSTRACT The present study uses the results of semi-structured interviews and participant observation with non-uniformed correctional staff and administrators in eight U.S. state prison systems to examine community-corrections partnerships in the areas of education, vocational training, reentry preparation, and psychosocial wellbeing. Through analysis derived from literature on the “what works” movement in corrections, volunteerism in prison, and correctional outsourcing, our findings suggest that community-corrections partnerships can provide a sense of purpose and hope for incarcerated individuals, support reentry preparedness, and reestablish community connections. However, such partnerships also generate challenges related to institutional capacity, security, and conflicting interests. Our findings suggest that correctional staff and administrators should incorporate qualitative impact evaluation methods describing how and why programs work, adopt LEAN methods of volunteer management, and support a human services lens regarding staff roles.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
3.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信