医学一年级学生不同教学方法的比较:主观上与客观上的比较

Dr Madhura V. Motagi
{"title":"医学一年级学生不同教学方法的比较:主观上与客观上的比较","authors":"Dr Madhura V. Motagi","doi":"10.37506/ijop.v8i3.1330","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: Our study was to compare three different teaching method in first year medical students. Objectives: To assess the outcome and perception of students towards teaching method. Method: 150 students were divided randomly in to 3 different groups as group A (attended Lecture), group B (attended demonstration) group C [attended small group discussion (SGD)], topic was Introduction to BP. As a pretest all the groups had answered a set of structured 25 MCQs, after attending their respective teaching sessions, immediately post test I and after 1 month post-test II was conducted. For subjective assessment likert scale was used. Statistical Analysis: Paired t test was used for comparison. “P”<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: There was a significant difference between pre-test and post-test I, pre-test and post-test II in all the groups (P<0.001). When we compared post-test I and II, group A and B showed the significant difference (P<0.05), as their performance in post-test II has reduced, but there was no significant difference showed by group C between post-test I and II, as their performance in post-test II has not reduced. Subjectively also Students preferred SGD as better teaching method. Concussion: Looking at results, clearly states that the SGD is better compared to other two method, both subjectively and objectively.","PeriodicalId":92916,"journal":{"name":"International journal of physiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Different Teaching Method in First Year Medical Students: Both Subjectively and Objectively\",\"authors\":\"Dr Madhura V. Motagi\",\"doi\":\"10.37506/ijop.v8i3.1330\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Aim: Our study was to compare three different teaching method in first year medical students. Objectives: To assess the outcome and perception of students towards teaching method. Method: 150 students were divided randomly in to 3 different groups as group A (attended Lecture), group B (attended demonstration) group C [attended small group discussion (SGD)], topic was Introduction to BP. As a pretest all the groups had answered a set of structured 25 MCQs, after attending their respective teaching sessions, immediately post test I and after 1 month post-test II was conducted. For subjective assessment likert scale was used. Statistical Analysis: Paired t test was used for comparison. “P”<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: There was a significant difference between pre-test and post-test I, pre-test and post-test II in all the groups (P<0.001). When we compared post-test I and II, group A and B showed the significant difference (P<0.05), as their performance in post-test II has reduced, but there was no significant difference showed by group C between post-test I and II, as their performance in post-test II has not reduced. Subjectively also Students preferred SGD as better teaching method. Concussion: Looking at results, clearly states that the SGD is better compared to other two method, both subjectively and objectively.\",\"PeriodicalId\":92916,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International journal of physiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International journal of physiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.37506/ijop.v8i3.1330\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International journal of physiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.37506/ijop.v8i3.1330","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:比较三种不同的教学方法对医学一年级学生的教学效果。目的:评估学生对教学方法的看法和效果。方法:将150名学生随机分为三组:A组(参加讲座)、B组(参加演示)、C组(参加小组讨论)。作为一项预测试,所有小组在参加各自的教学课程后,立即在第一次测试后和第二次测试后1个月,回答了一组结构化的25个MCQ。主观评价采用likert量表。统计分析:采用配对t检验进行比较。“P”<0.05被认为具有统计学意义。结果:各组试验前与试验后I、试验前和试验后II均有显著性差异(P<0.001)。当我们比较试验后I和II时,a组和B组表现出显著差异(P>0.05),因为它们在试验后II的表现有所下降,但C组试验后I与II无显著性差异,因为它们在测试后II中的性能没有降低。学生主观上也更喜欢SGD作为更好的教学方法。脑震荡:从结果来看,SGD在主观和客观上都优于其他两种方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Comparison of Different Teaching Method in First Year Medical Students: Both Subjectively and Objectively
Aim: Our study was to compare three different teaching method in first year medical students. Objectives: To assess the outcome and perception of students towards teaching method. Method: 150 students were divided randomly in to 3 different groups as group A (attended Lecture), group B (attended demonstration) group C [attended small group discussion (SGD)], topic was Introduction to BP. As a pretest all the groups had answered a set of structured 25 MCQs, after attending their respective teaching sessions, immediately post test I and after 1 month post-test II was conducted. For subjective assessment likert scale was used. Statistical Analysis: Paired t test was used for comparison. “P”<0.05 was considered as statistically significant. Results: There was a significant difference between pre-test and post-test I, pre-test and post-test II in all the groups (P<0.001). When we compared post-test I and II, group A and B showed the significant difference (P<0.05), as their performance in post-test II has reduced, but there was no significant difference showed by group C between post-test I and II, as their performance in post-test II has not reduced. Subjectively also Students preferred SGD as better teaching method. Concussion: Looking at results, clearly states that the SGD is better compared to other two method, both subjectively and objectively.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信