南非和津巴布韦国家公园的普遍可达性:公园管理理念

IF 2.1 Q2 HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM
O. Chikuta, Engelina du Plessis, M. Saayman
{"title":"南非和津巴布韦国家公园的普遍可达性:公园管理理念","authors":"O. Chikuta, Engelina du Plessis, M. Saayman","doi":"10.1080/21568316.2021.1910556","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This study sought to establish the perceptions of the management of National Parks in South Africa and Zimbabwe with respect to making their parks universally accessible. This study was set against a background of many people with disabilities who are willing and financially able to patron national parks being denied the opportunity to do so due to various barriers. Using a qualitative approach, the researchers explored the views of the management of South African National Parks (SANPARKS) and Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority (ZimParks) regarding the universal accessibility of National Parks. The study revealed that, generally, the management of the said parks appreciate the plight of people with disabilities who want to visit their parks and would have wanted the parks to be accessible to all people. However, the managers from SANPARKS seemed more willing and prepared to make their parks universally accessible compared to their counterparts from ZimParks.","PeriodicalId":47312,"journal":{"name":"Tourism Planning & Development","volume":"20 1","pages":"377 - 396"},"PeriodicalIF":2.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21568316.2021.1910556","citationCount":"4","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Universal Accessibility of National Parks in South Africa and Zimbabwe: Park Management Perceptions\",\"authors\":\"O. Chikuta, Engelina du Plessis, M. Saayman\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/21568316.2021.1910556\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT This study sought to establish the perceptions of the management of National Parks in South Africa and Zimbabwe with respect to making their parks universally accessible. This study was set against a background of many people with disabilities who are willing and financially able to patron national parks being denied the opportunity to do so due to various barriers. Using a qualitative approach, the researchers explored the views of the management of South African National Parks (SANPARKS) and Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority (ZimParks) regarding the universal accessibility of National Parks. The study revealed that, generally, the management of the said parks appreciate the plight of people with disabilities who want to visit their parks and would have wanted the parks to be accessible to all people. However, the managers from SANPARKS seemed more willing and prepared to make their parks universally accessible compared to their counterparts from ZimParks.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47312,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Tourism Planning & Development\",\"volume\":\"20 1\",\"pages\":\"377 - 396\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/21568316.2021.1910556\",\"citationCount\":\"4\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Tourism Planning & Development\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/21568316.2021.1910556\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Tourism Planning & Development","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/21568316.2021.1910556","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

摘要

本研究旨在建立南非和津巴布韦国家公园管理的观念,使其公园普遍可达。这项研究的背景是,由于各种障碍,许多残疾人愿意并有经济能力资助国家公园,却被剥夺了这样做的机会。采用定性方法,研究人员探讨了南非国家公园(SANPARKS)和津巴布韦公园和野生动物管理局(ZimParks)对国家公园普遍可达性的看法。研究表明,一般来说,上述公园的管理人员理解想要参观公园的残疾人的困境,并希望公园对所有人开放。然而,与ZimParks的经理相比,SANPARKS的经理似乎更愿意和准备让他们的公园普遍开放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Universal Accessibility of National Parks in South Africa and Zimbabwe: Park Management Perceptions
ABSTRACT This study sought to establish the perceptions of the management of National Parks in South Africa and Zimbabwe with respect to making their parks universally accessible. This study was set against a background of many people with disabilities who are willing and financially able to patron national parks being denied the opportunity to do so due to various barriers. Using a qualitative approach, the researchers explored the views of the management of South African National Parks (SANPARKS) and Zimbabwe Parks and Wildlife Management Authority (ZimParks) regarding the universal accessibility of National Parks. The study revealed that, generally, the management of the said parks appreciate the plight of people with disabilities who want to visit their parks and would have wanted the parks to be accessible to all people. However, the managers from SANPARKS seemed more willing and prepared to make their parks universally accessible compared to their counterparts from ZimParks.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Tourism Planning & Development
Tourism Planning & Development HOSPITALITY, LEISURE, SPORT & TOURISM-
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
8.30%
发文量
40
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信