{"title":"非洲新闻研究:非洲新闻与媒体研究四十年","authors":"W. Chuma","doi":"10.1080/23743670.2021.1987061","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"It has been four decades since this journal—then known as Equid Novi—made its debut on what was then a nascent field of journalism and communication studies in South Africa. By all accounts, the 1980s were tumultuous moments in the country’s political economy, and naturally journalism played key roles mediating these, for the better or worse. Within the academy, the disciplines of journalism, communication science and to a lesser extent fields of study such as media studies were fairly burgeoning, and were characterised by the political and ideological chasms and contestations between the English and Afrikaans institutions in which they were located. Against this background, Equid Novi presented itself as a platform for intellectual debate and “sparring”, not just within academe, but also between the researchers and journalism practitioners. No such platform existed at the time. Over the years, and with South Africa’s reintegration into the African and global political economy post-1994, the journal grew to become one of the leading spaces for research within media studies broadly, increasingly attracting both established and emerging researchers from across the African continent (including the MENA region). In this anniversary issue, we carry an interesting mix of research articles and commentaries that range from reflections on the history of journalism and media studies/communication studies in South Africa, the current debates on decolonisation of journalism, the current scourge of disinformation, the politics of media policy and regulation, and so on. Keyan Tomaselli’s autoethnography on the South African Communication Association (Sacomm) offers a critical reflection not just on the history of what has grown to become Southern Africa’s biggest annual gathering of media and communication researchers, but also the development of natural links between an academic journal of standing and an academic disciplinary association. As one of the key figures in the history of the discipline of communication studies in South Africa, Tomaselli’s personal recollection provides an invaluable window through which present and future students and scholars of South African and African media and communication studies catch a glimpse of the historical contestations, fissures and debates that shaped the development of the discipline. At the same time—and importantly so—Tomaselli is careful to declare his subjectivities, characterising his account as being “like being a fly in the soup” rather than pretending to be the proverbial, objective “fly on the wall”.","PeriodicalId":54049,"journal":{"name":"African Journalism Studies","volume":"42 1","pages":"1 - 3"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"African Journalism Studies: Mapping four Decades of African Journalism and Media Research\",\"authors\":\"W. Chuma\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23743670.2021.1987061\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"It has been four decades since this journal—then known as Equid Novi—made its debut on what was then a nascent field of journalism and communication studies in South Africa. By all accounts, the 1980s were tumultuous moments in the country’s political economy, and naturally journalism played key roles mediating these, for the better or worse. Within the academy, the disciplines of journalism, communication science and to a lesser extent fields of study such as media studies were fairly burgeoning, and were characterised by the political and ideological chasms and contestations between the English and Afrikaans institutions in which they were located. Against this background, Equid Novi presented itself as a platform for intellectual debate and “sparring”, not just within academe, but also between the researchers and journalism practitioners. No such platform existed at the time. Over the years, and with South Africa’s reintegration into the African and global political economy post-1994, the journal grew to become one of the leading spaces for research within media studies broadly, increasingly attracting both established and emerging researchers from across the African continent (including the MENA region). In this anniversary issue, we carry an interesting mix of research articles and commentaries that range from reflections on the history of journalism and media studies/communication studies in South Africa, the current debates on decolonisation of journalism, the current scourge of disinformation, the politics of media policy and regulation, and so on. Keyan Tomaselli’s autoethnography on the South African Communication Association (Sacomm) offers a critical reflection not just on the history of what has grown to become Southern Africa’s biggest annual gathering of media and communication researchers, but also the development of natural links between an academic journal of standing and an academic disciplinary association. As one of the key figures in the history of the discipline of communication studies in South Africa, Tomaselli’s personal recollection provides an invaluable window through which present and future students and scholars of South African and African media and communication studies catch a glimpse of the historical contestations, fissures and debates that shaped the development of the discipline. At the same time—and importantly so—Tomaselli is careful to declare his subjectivities, characterising his account as being “like being a fly in the soup” rather than pretending to be the proverbial, objective “fly on the wall”.\",\"PeriodicalId\":54049,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"African Journalism Studies\",\"volume\":\"42 1\",\"pages\":\"1 - 3\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-04-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"African Journalism Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23743670.2021.1987061\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"文学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"COMMUNICATION\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"African Journalism Studies","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23743670.2021.1987061","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
African Journalism Studies: Mapping four Decades of African Journalism and Media Research
It has been four decades since this journal—then known as Equid Novi—made its debut on what was then a nascent field of journalism and communication studies in South Africa. By all accounts, the 1980s were tumultuous moments in the country’s political economy, and naturally journalism played key roles mediating these, for the better or worse. Within the academy, the disciplines of journalism, communication science and to a lesser extent fields of study such as media studies were fairly burgeoning, and were characterised by the political and ideological chasms and contestations between the English and Afrikaans institutions in which they were located. Against this background, Equid Novi presented itself as a platform for intellectual debate and “sparring”, not just within academe, but also between the researchers and journalism practitioners. No such platform existed at the time. Over the years, and with South Africa’s reintegration into the African and global political economy post-1994, the journal grew to become one of the leading spaces for research within media studies broadly, increasingly attracting both established and emerging researchers from across the African continent (including the MENA region). In this anniversary issue, we carry an interesting mix of research articles and commentaries that range from reflections on the history of journalism and media studies/communication studies in South Africa, the current debates on decolonisation of journalism, the current scourge of disinformation, the politics of media policy and regulation, and so on. Keyan Tomaselli’s autoethnography on the South African Communication Association (Sacomm) offers a critical reflection not just on the history of what has grown to become Southern Africa’s biggest annual gathering of media and communication researchers, but also the development of natural links between an academic journal of standing and an academic disciplinary association. As one of the key figures in the history of the discipline of communication studies in South Africa, Tomaselli’s personal recollection provides an invaluable window through which present and future students and scholars of South African and African media and communication studies catch a glimpse of the historical contestations, fissures and debates that shaped the development of the discipline. At the same time—and importantly so—Tomaselli is careful to declare his subjectivities, characterising his account as being “like being a fly in the soup” rather than pretending to be the proverbial, objective “fly on the wall”.
期刊介绍:
Accredited by the South African Department of Higher Education and Training for university research purposes African Journalism Studies subscribes to the Code of Best Practice for Peer Reviewed Scholarly Journals of the Academy of Science of South Africa. African Journalism Studies ( AJS) aims to contribute to the ongoing extension of the theories, methodologies and empirical data to under-researched areas of knowledge production, through its emphasis on African journalism studies within a broader, comparative perspective of the Global South. AJS strives for theoretical diversity and methodological inclusivity, by developing theoretical approaches and making critical interventions in global scholarly debates. The journal''s comparative and interdisciplinary approach is informed by the related fields of cultural and media studies, communication studies, African studies, politics, and sociology. The field of journalism studies is understood broadly, as including the practices, norms, value systems, frameworks of representation, audiences, platforms, industries, theories and power relations that relate to the production, consumption and study of journalism. A wide definition of journalism is used, which extends beyond news and current affairs to include digital and social media, documentary film and narrative non-fiction.