“纯洁的幻想是可怕的”:(德)《人性的污点》中的身份建构

Q2 Arts and Humanities
Elliott
{"title":"“纯洁的幻想是可怕的”:(德)《人性的污点》中的身份建构","authors":"Elliott","doi":"10.5703/philrothstud.16.1.0092","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Criticism on Philip Roth's The Human Stain (2000) has often suggested that the novel be viewed as a celebration of the asocial individualism of the protagonist, Coleman Silk. \"(De)constructing Identity in The Human Stain\" claims that although certain perspectives in the novel—those of Coleman, his sister Ernestine, and Nathan Zuckerman—disclose their investment in Coleman's project of self-determination, these viewpoints are undermined by the text in important ways. Indeed, this essay argues that the novel accommodates a position that is antithetical to Coleman's belief that he can transcend his own history, reading Roth's novel in light of Alasdair MacIntyre's insistence that one's life must be understood in the context of a narrative over which one has limited control.","PeriodicalId":37093,"journal":{"name":"Philip Roth Studies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"\\\"The Fantasy of Purity Is Appalling\\\": (De)constructing Identity in The Human Stain\",\"authors\":\"Elliott\",\"doi\":\"10.5703/philrothstud.16.1.0092\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT:Criticism on Philip Roth's The Human Stain (2000) has often suggested that the novel be viewed as a celebration of the asocial individualism of the protagonist, Coleman Silk. \\\"(De)constructing Identity in The Human Stain\\\" claims that although certain perspectives in the novel—those of Coleman, his sister Ernestine, and Nathan Zuckerman—disclose their investment in Coleman's project of self-determination, these viewpoints are undermined by the text in important ways. Indeed, this essay argues that the novel accommodates a position that is antithetical to Coleman's belief that he can transcend his own history, reading Roth's novel in light of Alasdair MacIntyre's insistence that one's life must be understood in the context of a narrative over which one has limited control.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37093,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Philip Roth Studies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-03-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Philip Roth Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5703/philrothstud.16.1.0092\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philip Roth Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5703/philrothstud.16.1.0092","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

摘要:对菲利普·罗斯的《人性的污点》(2000)的批评常常认为这部小说是对主人公科尔曼·西尔克的反社会个人主义的颂扬。《在人类的污点中建构身份》声称,尽管小说中的某些观点——科尔曼、他的妹妹欧内斯汀和内森·祖克曼——表明了他们对科尔曼自决计划的投入,但这些观点在重要方面被文本所破坏。事实上,这篇文章认为,这部小说容纳了一种立场,与科尔曼认为他可以超越自己的历史的信念相反,根据阿拉斯代尔·麦金泰尔(Alasdair MacIntyre)的坚持,一个人的生活必须在一个人无法控制的叙事背景中被理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
"The Fantasy of Purity Is Appalling": (De)constructing Identity in The Human Stain
ABSTRACT:Criticism on Philip Roth's The Human Stain (2000) has often suggested that the novel be viewed as a celebration of the asocial individualism of the protagonist, Coleman Silk. "(De)constructing Identity in The Human Stain" claims that although certain perspectives in the novel—those of Coleman, his sister Ernestine, and Nathan Zuckerman—disclose their investment in Coleman's project of self-determination, these viewpoints are undermined by the text in important ways. Indeed, this essay argues that the novel accommodates a position that is antithetical to Coleman's belief that he can transcend his own history, reading Roth's novel in light of Alasdair MacIntyre's insistence that one's life must be understood in the context of a narrative over which one has limited control.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Philip Roth Studies
Philip Roth Studies Arts and Humanities-Literature and Literary Theory
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信