利用卫星图像比较内布拉斯加沙丘两个县的土地覆盖和水资源

Gabrielle Baker, M. Vinton
{"title":"利用卫星图像比较内布拉斯加沙丘两个县的土地覆盖和水资源","authors":"Gabrielle Baker, M. Vinton","doi":"10.32873/unl.dc.tnas.42.4","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The Nebraska Sandhills comprise the most intact grassland habitat in the world and 95% of land use consists of low intensity\ncattle grazing. Water is a key resource for cattle and for growing hay forage in this semi-arid grassland. Ranchers rely on either\nnaturally occurring wet meadows or center pivot irrigation systems (CPIS) to produce hay. With the possibility of climate change\ncreating more frequent extreme weather events, more flooding events or severe droughts could affect land and water resources in\nthe Sandhills. With potentially more wet/dry extremes in the future, an understanding of the way water resources respond, and\nthe different strategies of landowners, will be important in assessing the overall resilience of the Nebraska Sandhills in the face of\na changing climate.\nWe compared two adjacent, similarly sized, counties, Grant and Hooker, in the central Sandhills that differ in the amount of\nnaturally occurring, ground water-fed meadows during the period 2002-2019, spanning wet and dry years. ArcGIS and the USDA’s\nCropland Data Layer (known as “CropScape”), an annual, satellite imagery-derived, land cover map, were used to quantify overall\nlandcover, especially the cover of wet meadows and the number of CPIS.\nIn 2016, an average-to-moderate precipitation year, Grant County had approximately 10 times more open water area and 9\ntimes more wet meadow area than Hooker County. In contrast, Hooker County had 19 times more barren ground area and nearly\ntwice as many CPIS as Grant County. Furthermore, in drought years, the amount of barren ground increased in both counties,\nnearly doubling in Hooker County in 2006, a year when annual precipitation was only 66% of normal precipitation rates. Drought\nalso increased the acreage devoted to irrigated crops, particularly in 2006 in both counties, with nearly two times as many acres in\nGrant County and nearly five times as many acres in Hooker County. Additionally, open water acreage decreased by nearly 50%\nfollowing the 2006 drought and wetland cover types increased.\nThis analysis showed that different Sandhill counties have contrasting water resources, with an abundance of naturally occurring\nwet meadows in Grant County, whereas Hooker County has fewer wet meadows and more CPIS. Furthermore, our analysis suggests\nthat the landscape changes during drought years, with a decline in wet meadows, an increase in barren ground and an increase in\nCPIS and other irrigated systems for crops. In a changing climate, with potentially more extremes in precipitation, the diversity of\nstrategies exemplified by these two counties will be important to inform adaptative responses. Overall, this research will contribute\nto a better understanding of the sustainability of land use and the future of groundwater resources in the Nebraska Sandhills.","PeriodicalId":91981,"journal":{"name":"Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and affiliated societies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-06-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Using satellite imagery to compare land cover and water resources\\nin two counties of the Nebraska Sandhills\",\"authors\":\"Gabrielle Baker, M. Vinton\",\"doi\":\"10.32873/unl.dc.tnas.42.4\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The Nebraska Sandhills comprise the most intact grassland habitat in the world and 95% of land use consists of low intensity\\ncattle grazing. Water is a key resource for cattle and for growing hay forage in this semi-arid grassland. Ranchers rely on either\\nnaturally occurring wet meadows or center pivot irrigation systems (CPIS) to produce hay. With the possibility of climate change\\ncreating more frequent extreme weather events, more flooding events or severe droughts could affect land and water resources in\\nthe Sandhills. With potentially more wet/dry extremes in the future, an understanding of the way water resources respond, and\\nthe different strategies of landowners, will be important in assessing the overall resilience of the Nebraska Sandhills in the face of\\na changing climate.\\nWe compared two adjacent, similarly sized, counties, Grant and Hooker, in the central Sandhills that differ in the amount of\\nnaturally occurring, ground water-fed meadows during the period 2002-2019, spanning wet and dry years. ArcGIS and the USDA’s\\nCropland Data Layer (known as “CropScape”), an annual, satellite imagery-derived, land cover map, were used to quantify overall\\nlandcover, especially the cover of wet meadows and the number of CPIS.\\nIn 2016, an average-to-moderate precipitation year, Grant County had approximately 10 times more open water area and 9\\ntimes more wet meadow area than Hooker County. In contrast, Hooker County had 19 times more barren ground area and nearly\\ntwice as many CPIS as Grant County. Furthermore, in drought years, the amount of barren ground increased in both counties,\\nnearly doubling in Hooker County in 2006, a year when annual precipitation was only 66% of normal precipitation rates. Drought\\nalso increased the acreage devoted to irrigated crops, particularly in 2006 in both counties, with nearly two times as many acres in\\nGrant County and nearly five times as many acres in Hooker County. Additionally, open water acreage decreased by nearly 50%\\nfollowing the 2006 drought and wetland cover types increased.\\nThis analysis showed that different Sandhill counties have contrasting water resources, with an abundance of naturally occurring\\nwet meadows in Grant County, whereas Hooker County has fewer wet meadows and more CPIS. Furthermore, our analysis suggests\\nthat the landscape changes during drought years, with a decline in wet meadows, an increase in barren ground and an increase in\\nCPIS and other irrigated systems for crops. In a changing climate, with potentially more extremes in precipitation, the diversity of\\nstrategies exemplified by these two counties will be important to inform adaptative responses. Overall, this research will contribute\\nto a better understanding of the sustainability of land use and the future of groundwater resources in the Nebraska Sandhills.\",\"PeriodicalId\":91981,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and affiliated societies\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-06-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and affiliated societies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.32873/unl.dc.tnas.42.4\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transactions of the Nebraska Academy of Sciences and affiliated societies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32873/unl.dc.tnas.42.4","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

内布拉斯加沙丘是世界上最完整的草原栖息地,95%的土地利用都是低强度的放牧。在这片半干旱的草原上,水是养牛和种植干草的关键资源。牧场主依靠自然形成的湿润草地或中心枢纽灌溉系统(CPIS)来生产干草。随着气候变化可能导致更频繁的极端天气事件,更多的洪水事件或严重干旱可能会影响沙丘的土地和水资源。随着未来可能出现更多的潮湿/干燥极端情况,了解水资源的反应方式和土地所有者的不同策略,对于评估内布拉斯加州沙丘在气候变化时的整体恢复力至关重要。我们比较了2002-2019年期间,两个相邻的、规模相似的县,格兰特县和胡克县,这两个县位于沙丘中部,在潮湿和干燥的年份里,天然存在的地下水灌溉草地的数量不同。ArcGIS和USDA的农田数据层(称为“CropScape”)是一张年度卫星图像衍生的土地覆盖图,用于量化整个土地覆盖,特别是湿草地的覆盖和CPIS的数量。2016年是一个平均到中等降雨量的年份,格兰特县的开阔水域面积是胡克县的10倍,湿草地面积是胡克县的9倍。相比之下,胡克县的贫瘠土地面积是格兰特县的19倍,CPIS的数量几乎是格兰特郡的两倍。此外,在干旱年份,这两个县的贫瘠土地数量都有所增加,胡克县在2006年几乎翻了一番,当时的年降水量仅为正常降水率的66%。干旱也增加了灌溉作物的面积,特别是在2006年,这两个县的灌溉作物面积几乎是格兰特县的两倍,胡克县的灌溉面积几乎是胡克县五倍。此外,2006年干旱后,开放水域面积减少了近50%,湿地覆盖类型增加。该分析表明,不同的Sandhill县具有不同的水资源,Grant县有丰富的天然湿草地,而Hooker县的湿草地较少,CPIS较多。此外,我们的分析表明,干旱年份的景观发生了变化,潮湿草地减少,贫瘠土地增加,CPIS和其他作物灌溉系统增加。在气候变化的情况下,降水可能会出现更多的极端情况,这两个县所体现的气候多样性对于适应反应至关重要。总的来说,这项研究将有助于更好地了解内布拉斯加州沙丘土地利用的可持续性和地下水资源的未来。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Using satellite imagery to compare land cover and water resources in two counties of the Nebraska Sandhills
The Nebraska Sandhills comprise the most intact grassland habitat in the world and 95% of land use consists of low intensity cattle grazing. Water is a key resource for cattle and for growing hay forage in this semi-arid grassland. Ranchers rely on either naturally occurring wet meadows or center pivot irrigation systems (CPIS) to produce hay. With the possibility of climate change creating more frequent extreme weather events, more flooding events or severe droughts could affect land and water resources in the Sandhills. With potentially more wet/dry extremes in the future, an understanding of the way water resources respond, and the different strategies of landowners, will be important in assessing the overall resilience of the Nebraska Sandhills in the face of a changing climate. We compared two adjacent, similarly sized, counties, Grant and Hooker, in the central Sandhills that differ in the amount of naturally occurring, ground water-fed meadows during the period 2002-2019, spanning wet and dry years. ArcGIS and the USDA’s Cropland Data Layer (known as “CropScape”), an annual, satellite imagery-derived, land cover map, were used to quantify overall landcover, especially the cover of wet meadows and the number of CPIS. In 2016, an average-to-moderate precipitation year, Grant County had approximately 10 times more open water area and 9 times more wet meadow area than Hooker County. In contrast, Hooker County had 19 times more barren ground area and nearly twice as many CPIS as Grant County. Furthermore, in drought years, the amount of barren ground increased in both counties, nearly doubling in Hooker County in 2006, a year when annual precipitation was only 66% of normal precipitation rates. Drought also increased the acreage devoted to irrigated crops, particularly in 2006 in both counties, with nearly two times as many acres in Grant County and nearly five times as many acres in Hooker County. Additionally, open water acreage decreased by nearly 50% following the 2006 drought and wetland cover types increased. This analysis showed that different Sandhill counties have contrasting water resources, with an abundance of naturally occurring wet meadows in Grant County, whereas Hooker County has fewer wet meadows and more CPIS. Furthermore, our analysis suggests that the landscape changes during drought years, with a decline in wet meadows, an increase in barren ground and an increase in CPIS and other irrigated systems for crops. In a changing climate, with potentially more extremes in precipitation, the diversity of strategies exemplified by these two counties will be important to inform adaptative responses. Overall, this research will contribute to a better understanding of the sustainability of land use and the future of groundwater resources in the Nebraska Sandhills.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信