阴谋论理论的规范性转向？

IF 1.4 2区哲学 Q1 HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE

Social Epistemology Pub Date : 2023-02-20 DOI:10.1080/02691728.2023.2172701

P. Stokes

{"title":"阴谋论理论的规范性转向？","authors":"P. Stokes","doi":"10.1080/02691728.2023.2172701","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT The papers contained in this special issue are evidence that the philosophy of conspiracy theory is undergoing a ‘normative turn’, with earlier concerns about the epistemological soundness of conspiracy theories now being supplemented by a shift to concerns about discursive and epistemic justice. This is a welcome development. Nonetheless, these normative concerns need to be seen within the context of an ongoing and largely undeclared disagreement between generalists and particularists over just how conspired the world really is.","PeriodicalId":51614,"journal":{"name":"Social Epistemology","volume":"37 1","pages":"535 - 543"},"PeriodicalIF":1.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Normative Turn in Conspiracy Theory Theory?\",\"authors\":\"P. Stokes\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/02691728.2023.2172701\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT The papers contained in this special issue are evidence that the philosophy of conspiracy theory is undergoing a ‘normative turn’, with earlier concerns about the epistemological soundness of conspiracy theories now being supplemented by a shift to concerns about discursive and epistemic justice. This is a welcome development. Nonetheless, these normative concerns need to be seen within the context of an ongoing and largely undeclared disagreement between generalists and particularists over just how conspired the world really is.\",\"PeriodicalId\":51614,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Social Epistemology\",\"volume\":\"37 1\",\"pages\":\"535 - 543\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-02-20\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Social Epistemology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"98\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2023.2172701\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"哲学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Social Epistemology","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2023.2172701","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"哲学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"HISTORY & PHILOSOPHY OF SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 2

摘要

摘要本期特刊中的论文证明，阴谋论哲学正在经历一场“规范性转变”，早期对阴谋论认识论合理性的担忧现在被对话语正义和认识正义的担忧所补充。这是一个可喜的发展。尽管如此，这些规范性的担忧需要放在通才主义者和特殊主义者之间关于世界到底有多复杂的持续且基本上未公开的分歧的背景下看待。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The Normative Turn in Conspiracy Theory Theory?

ABSTRACT The papers contained in this special issue are evidence that the philosophy of conspiracy theory is undergoing a ‘normative turn’, with earlier concerns about the epistemological soundness of conspiracy theories now being supplemented by a shift to concerns about discursive and epistemic justice. This is a welcome development. Nonetheless, these normative concerns need to be seen within the context of an ongoing and largely undeclared disagreement between generalists and particularists over just how conspired the world really is.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Social Epistemology Multiple-

CiteScore

2.60

自引率

17.60%

发文量

期刊介绍： Social Epistemology provides a forum for philosophical and social scientific enquiry that incorporates the work of scholars from a variety of disciplines who share a concern with the production, assessment and validation of knowledge. The journal covers both empirical research into the origination and transmission of knowledge and normative considerations which arise as such research is implemented, serving as a guide for directing contemporary knowledge enterprises. Social Epistemology publishes "exchanges" which are the collective product of several contributors and take the form of critical syntheses, open peer commentaries interviews, applications, provocations, reviews and responses