黑海海洋划界案(罗马尼亚诉乌克兰)。职位调查

Q2 Social Sciences
Iryna Varykasha
{"title":"黑海海洋划界案(罗马尼亚诉乌克兰)。职位调查","authors":"Iryna Varykasha","doi":"10.26886/2524-101x.5.2019.3","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"In this article, I had studied the materials about the delineation at sea, carried out, with the consent of the respective states, by the UN International Court of Justice. Such a choice is conditioned by a specific goal-to show how the International Court interpreted contractual sources of international maritime law, how it identified the applicable customary legal norms and principles, how it applied international law on the delineation at sea, to what extent the relevant factors were taken into account in specific situations of maritime delimitation, as he set forth the appropriate international legal argument. In addition, the study of the Court’s materials provides opportunities to identify the legal positions of the disputing States on the problems of delineation at sea and the international legal assessment of such positions by the Court. The key words: delimitation in the Black Sea, international law, International Court of Justice, maritime boundaries, Romania v. Ukraine.","PeriodicalId":36374,"journal":{"name":"Lex Portus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-10-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Case concerning maritime delimitation in the Black Sea (Romania v. Ukraine). Investigation of positions\",\"authors\":\"Iryna Varykasha\",\"doi\":\"10.26886/2524-101x.5.2019.3\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"In this article, I had studied the materials about the delineation at sea, carried out, with the consent of the respective states, by the UN International Court of Justice. Such a choice is conditioned by a specific goal-to show how the International Court interpreted contractual sources of international maritime law, how it identified the applicable customary legal norms and principles, how it applied international law on the delineation at sea, to what extent the relevant factors were taken into account in specific situations of maritime delimitation, as he set forth the appropriate international legal argument. In addition, the study of the Court’s materials provides opportunities to identify the legal positions of the disputing States on the problems of delineation at sea and the international legal assessment of such positions by the Court. The key words: delimitation in the Black Sea, international law, International Court of Justice, maritime boundaries, Romania v. Ukraine.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36374,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lex Portus\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2019-10-30\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lex Portus\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.26886/2524-101x.5.2019.3\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lex Portus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.26886/2524-101x.5.2019.3","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在这篇文章中,我研究了联合国国际法院在各自国家同意的情况下进行的海上划界的材料。这种选择的条件是一个特定的目标,即在他提出适当的国际法论据时,显示国际法院如何解释国际海洋法的合同渊源,如何确定适用的习惯法规范和原则,如何将国际法应用于海上划界,在何种程度上考虑了海洋划界的具体情况下的相关因素。此外,对法院材料的研究提供了查明争端国在海上划界问题上的法律立场以及法院对这种立场的国际法律评价的机会。关键词:黑海划界,国际法,国际法院,海洋边界,罗马尼亚诉乌克兰。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Case concerning maritime delimitation in the Black Sea (Romania v. Ukraine). Investigation of positions
In this article, I had studied the materials about the delineation at sea, carried out, with the consent of the respective states, by the UN International Court of Justice. Such a choice is conditioned by a specific goal-to show how the International Court interpreted contractual sources of international maritime law, how it identified the applicable customary legal norms and principles, how it applied international law on the delineation at sea, to what extent the relevant factors were taken into account in specific situations of maritime delimitation, as he set forth the appropriate international legal argument. In addition, the study of the Court’s materials provides opportunities to identify the legal positions of the disputing States on the problems of delineation at sea and the international legal assessment of such positions by the Court. The key words: delimitation in the Black Sea, international law, International Court of Justice, maritime boundaries, Romania v. Ukraine.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Lex Portus
Lex Portus Social Sciences-Law
CiteScore
1.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
16
审稿时长
6 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信