驻地专家:关键参与行动研究为公共住房研究和实践提供信息的潜力

IF 1.6 4区 管理学 Q3 MANAGEMENT
Amie Thurber, Leslie V. Collins, M. Greer, D. McKnight, D. Thompson
{"title":"驻地专家:关键参与行动研究为公共住房研究和实践提供信息的潜力","authors":"Amie Thurber, Leslie V. Collins, M. Greer, D. McKnight, D. Thompson","doi":"10.1177/1476750317725799","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Policies affecting those living in poverty are often created without the direct and meaningful participation of the people meant to be served. This has been especially the case with public housing. To contextualize the need for alternative approaches to inquiry, we begin by examining the history of public housing through the lens of oppression and present critical Participatory Action Research as an alternative approach to research and policy-making. We provide a case study of a critical Participatory Action Research project sited in a public housing project slated for redevelopment. We conclude that engaging “resident experts” in the research process heightened the validity and credibility of the findings, amplified residents' self-determination, and provided greater congruence between the researchers' social justice values and our research methods.","PeriodicalId":46969,"journal":{"name":"Action Research","volume":"18 1","pages":"414 - 432"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2020-12-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1476750317725799","citationCount":"7","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Resident experts: The potential of critical Participatory Action Research to inform public housing research and practice\",\"authors\":\"Amie Thurber, Leslie V. Collins, M. Greer, D. McKnight, D. Thompson\",\"doi\":\"10.1177/1476750317725799\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Policies affecting those living in poverty are often created without the direct and meaningful participation of the people meant to be served. This has been especially the case with public housing. To contextualize the need for alternative approaches to inquiry, we begin by examining the history of public housing through the lens of oppression and present critical Participatory Action Research as an alternative approach to research and policy-making. We provide a case study of a critical Participatory Action Research project sited in a public housing project slated for redevelopment. We conclude that engaging “resident experts” in the research process heightened the validity and credibility of the findings, amplified residents' self-determination, and provided greater congruence between the researchers' social justice values and our research methods.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46969,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Action Research\",\"volume\":\"18 1\",\"pages\":\"414 - 432\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-12-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1476750317725799\",\"citationCount\":\"7\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Action Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"91\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750317725799\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"管理学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MANAGEMENT\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Action Research","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1476750317725799","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

摘要

影响贫困人口的政策往往是在没有本应得到服务的人民直接和有意义的参与的情况下制定的。公共住房尤其如此。为了了解替代调查方法的必要性,我们首先从压迫的角度审视公共住房的历史,并将批判性参与行动研究作为研究和决策的替代方法。我们提供了一个关键的参与式行动研究项目的案例研究,该项目位于一个计划重建的公共住房项目中。我们的结论是,让“居民专家”参与研究过程提高了研究结果的有效性和可信度,增强了居民的自决能力,并使研究人员的社会正义价值观与我们的研究方法更加一致。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Resident experts: The potential of critical Participatory Action Research to inform public housing research and practice
Policies affecting those living in poverty are often created without the direct and meaningful participation of the people meant to be served. This has been especially the case with public housing. To contextualize the need for alternative approaches to inquiry, we begin by examining the history of public housing through the lens of oppression and present critical Participatory Action Research as an alternative approach to research and policy-making. We provide a case study of a critical Participatory Action Research project sited in a public housing project slated for redevelopment. We conclude that engaging “resident experts” in the research process heightened the validity and credibility of the findings, amplified residents' self-determination, and provided greater congruence between the researchers' social justice values and our research methods.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Action Research
Action Research Multiple-
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
10.50%
发文量
15
期刊介绍: Action Research is a new international, interdisciplinary, refereed journal which is a forum for the development of the theory and practice of action research. Our purpose with this international, peer reviewed journal is to offer a forum for participative, action oriented inquiry into questions that matter--questions relevant to people in the conduct of their lives, that enable them to flourish in their organizations and communities, and that evince a deep concern for the wider ecology. The aim of the journal is to offer a viable alternative to dominant "disinterested" models of social science, one that is relevant to people in the conduct of their lives, their organizations and their communities.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信