非侵入性足趾运动触诊和经腹部超声成像评估女性盆底功能的同时有效性

R. Maher, Jenna Iberle
{"title":"非侵入性足趾运动触诊和经腹部超声成像评估女性盆底功能的同时有效性","authors":"R. Maher, Jenna Iberle","doi":"10.1097/JWH.0000000000000175","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Background: No gold standard exists for assessing pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function. However, a significant correlation exists between digital palpation and transabdominal ultrasound imaging (TAUS), with studies indicating that the coccyx moves during contractions. Objectives: To determine concurrent validity of external coccyx motion palpation (CMP) versus TAUS to identify the former's validity in assessing PFM function. Study Design: A cross-sectional observational study. Methods: Sixty-four women were screened. Those who could perform a PFM contraction were enrolled (n = 37; mean 31.5 years). A single investigator was assigned to either TAUS or CMP. Participants were randomly assigned to perform either a PFM contraction, bearing down, or nothing under randomly assigned testing positions: standing, sitting, and side-lying while simultaneous TAUS and CMP occurred. Investigators were blinded to each other's assessment, and participant-assigned tasks. Participants were blinded to TAUS. Results: Sensitivity and specificity were 94% and 79%, respectively, for CMP versus TAUS. χ2 tests and phi coefficient (ϕ) revealed a significant strong relationship between TAUS and CMP across positions: standing χ2(1, n = 37) = 17.87, P < .001, ϕ = 0.7; sitting χ2(1, n = 37) = 15.79, P < .001, ϕ = 0.65; and side-lying χ2(1, n = 37) = 17.88, P < .001, ϕ = 0.7, respectively. Conclusions: CMP is a valid screening method that can be used by all clinicians. It may decrease unnecessary internal digital assessment while being more acceptable to women who decline an internal digital assessment, or in pregnant women for whom a digital assessment may be contraindicated. We have included a Video Abstract that highlights our ultrasound cine-loops and findings in our article (see the Video Abstract, Supplemental Digital Content, available at: http://links.lww.com/JWHPT/A31).","PeriodicalId":74018,"journal":{"name":"Journal of women's health physical therapy","volume":"44 1","pages":"176 - 181"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-08-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Concurrent Validity of Noninvasive Coccygeal Motion Palpation and Transabdominal Ultrasound Imaging in the Assessment of Pelvic Floor Function in Women\",\"authors\":\"R. Maher, Jenna Iberle\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/JWH.0000000000000175\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Background: No gold standard exists for assessing pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function. However, a significant correlation exists between digital palpation and transabdominal ultrasound imaging (TAUS), with studies indicating that the coccyx moves during contractions. Objectives: To determine concurrent validity of external coccyx motion palpation (CMP) versus TAUS to identify the former's validity in assessing PFM function. Study Design: A cross-sectional observational study. Methods: Sixty-four women were screened. Those who could perform a PFM contraction were enrolled (n = 37; mean 31.5 years). A single investigator was assigned to either TAUS or CMP. Participants were randomly assigned to perform either a PFM contraction, bearing down, or nothing under randomly assigned testing positions: standing, sitting, and side-lying while simultaneous TAUS and CMP occurred. Investigators were blinded to each other's assessment, and participant-assigned tasks. Participants were blinded to TAUS. Results: Sensitivity and specificity were 94% and 79%, respectively, for CMP versus TAUS. χ2 tests and phi coefficient (ϕ) revealed a significant strong relationship between TAUS and CMP across positions: standing χ2(1, n = 37) = 17.87, P < .001, ϕ = 0.7; sitting χ2(1, n = 37) = 15.79, P < .001, ϕ = 0.65; and side-lying χ2(1, n = 37) = 17.88, P < .001, ϕ = 0.7, respectively. Conclusions: CMP is a valid screening method that can be used by all clinicians. It may decrease unnecessary internal digital assessment while being more acceptable to women who decline an internal digital assessment, or in pregnant women for whom a digital assessment may be contraindicated. We have included a Video Abstract that highlights our ultrasound cine-loops and findings in our article (see the Video Abstract, Supplemental Digital Content, available at: http://links.lww.com/JWHPT/A31).\",\"PeriodicalId\":74018,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of women's health physical therapy\",\"volume\":\"44 1\",\"pages\":\"176 - 181\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2020-08-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"3\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of women's health physical therapy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/JWH.0000000000000175\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of women's health physical therapy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/JWH.0000000000000175","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

摘要

文本中提供了补充数字内容。背景:目前尚无评估盆底肌(PFM)功能的金标准。然而,数字触诊和经腹部超声成像(TAUS)之间存在显著相关性,研究表明尾骨在收缩过程中会移动。目的:确定外尾骨运动触诊(CMP)与TAUS的同时有效性,以确定前者在评估PFM功能方面的有效性。研究设计:横断面观察性研究。方法:对64名女性进行筛查。那些能够进行PFM收缩的患者被纳入研究(n=37;平均31.5年)。一名研究者被分配到TAUS或CMP。参与者被随机分配在随机分配的测试位置下进行PFM收缩、向下压或什么都不做:站立、坐着和侧卧,同时进行TAUS和CMP。研究人员对彼此的评估视而不见,参与者分配任务。参与者对TAUS视而不见。结果:CMP与TAUS的敏感性和特异性分别为94%和79%。χ2检验和φ系数(ξ)显示,TAUS和CMP之间存在显著的强相关性:站立χ2(1,n=37)=17.87,P<.001,ξ=0.7;坐位χ2(1,n=37)=15.79,P<.001,ξ=0.65;侧卧χ2(1,n=37)=17.88,P<.001,ξ=0.7。结论:CMP是一种有效的筛查方法,所有临床医生都可以使用。它可以减少不必要的内部数字评估,同时更容易被拒绝内部数字评估的女性或数字评估可能禁忌的孕妇接受。我们在文章中包含了一个视频摘要,突出了我们的超声波电影循环和发现(请参阅视频摘要,补充数字内容,可在以下网址获得:http://links.lww.com/JWHPT/A31)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Concurrent Validity of Noninvasive Coccygeal Motion Palpation and Transabdominal Ultrasound Imaging in the Assessment of Pelvic Floor Function in Women
Supplemental Digital Content is Available in the Text. Background: No gold standard exists for assessing pelvic floor muscle (PFM) function. However, a significant correlation exists between digital palpation and transabdominal ultrasound imaging (TAUS), with studies indicating that the coccyx moves during contractions. Objectives: To determine concurrent validity of external coccyx motion palpation (CMP) versus TAUS to identify the former's validity in assessing PFM function. Study Design: A cross-sectional observational study. Methods: Sixty-four women were screened. Those who could perform a PFM contraction were enrolled (n = 37; mean 31.5 years). A single investigator was assigned to either TAUS or CMP. Participants were randomly assigned to perform either a PFM contraction, bearing down, or nothing under randomly assigned testing positions: standing, sitting, and side-lying while simultaneous TAUS and CMP occurred. Investigators were blinded to each other's assessment, and participant-assigned tasks. Participants were blinded to TAUS. Results: Sensitivity and specificity were 94% and 79%, respectively, for CMP versus TAUS. χ2 tests and phi coefficient (ϕ) revealed a significant strong relationship between TAUS and CMP across positions: standing χ2(1, n = 37) = 17.87, P < .001, ϕ = 0.7; sitting χ2(1, n = 37) = 15.79, P < .001, ϕ = 0.65; and side-lying χ2(1, n = 37) = 17.88, P < .001, ϕ = 0.7, respectively. Conclusions: CMP is a valid screening method that can be used by all clinicians. It may decrease unnecessary internal digital assessment while being more acceptable to women who decline an internal digital assessment, or in pregnant women for whom a digital assessment may be contraindicated. We have included a Video Abstract that highlights our ultrasound cine-loops and findings in our article (see the Video Abstract, Supplemental Digital Content, available at: http://links.lww.com/JWHPT/A31).
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信