S曲线:ERP评价的动态视角

IF 1 4区经济学 Q4 BUSINESS

Engineering Economist Pub Date : 2023-05-13 DOI:10.1080/0013791X.2023.2209080

Liang-Hong Wu, Khire Rushikesh Ulhas, K. Tan, Liang-Chuan Wu

{"title":"S曲线:ERP评价的动态视角","authors":"Liang-Hong Wu, Khire Rushikesh Ulhas, K. Tan, Liang-Chuan Wu","doi":"10.1080/0013791X.2023.2209080","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Previous Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) evaluation methods using closed-form solutions have ignored the unique characteristics of ERP’s life cycle. We propose a lifecycle model based on simulation and stochastic processes to capture and evaluate ERP’s value, including additional key factors. Our results show that accounting for the life cycle, ERP value differs from traditional wisdom and supports decision making from various factors and scopes, considering ERP’s implementation’s unique characteristics.","PeriodicalId":49210,"journal":{"name":"Engineering Economist","volume":"68 1","pages":"169 - 188"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The S curve: A dynamic view of in ERP evaluation\",\"authors\":\"Liang-Hong Wu, Khire Rushikesh Ulhas, K. Tan, Liang-Chuan Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/0013791X.2023.2209080\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Abstract Previous Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) evaluation methods using closed-form solutions have ignored the unique characteristics of ERP’s life cycle. We propose a lifecycle model based on simulation and stochastic processes to capture and evaluate ERP’s value, including additional key factors. Our results show that accounting for the life cycle, ERP value differs from traditional wisdom and supports decision making from various factors and scopes, considering ERP’s implementation’s unique characteristics.\",\"PeriodicalId\":49210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Engineering Economist\",\"volume\":\"68 1\",\"pages\":\"169 - 188\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-05-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Engineering Economist\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/0013791X.2023.2209080\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"BUSINESS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Engineering Economist","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/0013791X.2023.2209080","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

以往的企业资源规划(ERP)评价方法采用闭式解，忽略了ERP生命周期的独特性。我们提出了一个基于模拟和随机过程的生命周期模型来捕捉和评估ERP的价值，包括其他关键因素。我们的研究结果表明，考虑到ERP实施的独特特点，考虑到生命周期，ERP价值不同于传统的智慧，并从各个因素和范围支持决策。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

The S curve: A dynamic view of in ERP evaluation

Abstract Previous Enterprise Resource Planning (ERP) evaluation methods using closed-form solutions have ignored the unique characteristics of ERP’s life cycle. We propose a lifecycle model based on simulation and stochastic processes to capture and evaluate ERP’s value, including additional key factors. Our results show that accounting for the life cycle, ERP value differs from traditional wisdom and supports decision making from various factors and scopes, considering ERP’s implementation’s unique characteristics.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Engineering Economist ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL-OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE

CiteScore

2.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

审稿时长

>12 weeks

期刊介绍： The Engineering Economist is a refereed journal published jointly by the Engineering Economy Division of the American Society of Engineering Education (ASEE) and the Institute of Industrial and Systems Engineers (IISE). The journal publishes articles, case studies, surveys, and book and software reviews that represent original research, current practice, and teaching involving problems of capital investment. The journal seeks submissions in a number of areas, including, but not limited to: capital investment analysis, financial risk management, cost estimation and accounting, cost of capital, design economics, economic decision analysis, engineering economy education, research and development, and the analysis of public policy when it is relevant to the economic investment decisions made by engineers and technology managers.