构建分歧空间

IF 0.8 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS

Language and Dialogue Pub Date : 2021-08-03 DOI:10.1075/ld.00100.vas

Alena L. Vasilyeva

{"title":"构建分歧空间","authors":"Alena L. Vasilyeva","doi":"10.1075/ld.00100.vas","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The study is a single case analysis and explores how disagreement space is constructed in a dialogue that\n addresses language ideology and identity issues in Belarus. Disagreement space is understood as a set of the interactant’s\n commitments, beliefs, intentions that can be reconstructed from their actions and “called out” by another participant (Jackson 1992). The interactional data includes the video-recording of the debate that was\n devoted to the issue whether Belarusian should be the only official language of Belarus. While two opponents are dominating\n parties in this debate, the host also plays an important role in this argumentative activity. The current study examines the\n host’s actions to shape disagreement space and argues that the host should be viewed as a valid party in a multi-party\n argumentative activity.","PeriodicalId":42318,"journal":{"name":"Language and Dialogue","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2021-08-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Constructing disagreement space\",\"authors\":\"Alena L. Vasilyeva\",\"doi\":\"10.1075/ld.00100.vas\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n The study is a single case analysis and explores how disagreement space is constructed in a dialogue that\\n addresses language ideology and identity issues in Belarus. Disagreement space is understood as a set of the interactant’s\\n commitments, beliefs, intentions that can be reconstructed from their actions and “called out” by another participant (Jackson 1992). The interactional data includes the video-recording of the debate that was\\n devoted to the issue whether Belarusian should be the only official language of Belarus. While two opponents are dominating\\n parties in this debate, the host also plays an important role in this argumentative activity. The current study examines the\\n host’s actions to shape disagreement space and argues that the host should be viewed as a valid party in a multi-party\\n argumentative activity.\",\"PeriodicalId\":42318,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Language and Dialogue\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-08-03\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Language and Dialogue\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00100.vas\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language and Dialogue","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1075/ld.00100.vas","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究为个案分析，探讨如何在对话中建构歧见空间，以探讨白俄罗斯的语言、意识形态与认同议题。分歧空间被理解为一组互动者的承诺、信念、意图，这些可以从他们的行为中重建，并被另一个参与者“呼唤”出来(Jackson 1992)。互动资料包括讨论白俄罗斯语是否应成为白俄罗斯唯一官方语言的录像。在这场辩论中，虽然两个对手是主要的政党，但主持人在这场辩论活动中也扮演着重要的角色。目前的研究考察了主人的行动，以形成分歧的空间，并认为主人应该被视为一个有效的一方在多方辩论活动。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

Constructing disagreement space

The study is a single case analysis and explores how disagreement space is constructed in a dialogue that addresses language ideology and identity issues in Belarus. Disagreement space is understood as a set of the interactant’s commitments, beliefs, intentions that can be reconstructed from their actions and “called out” by another participant (Jackson 1992). The interactional data includes the video-recording of the debate that was devoted to the issue whether Belarusian should be the only official language of Belarus. While two opponents are dominating parties in this debate, the host also plays an important role in this argumentative activity. The current study examines the host’s actions to shape disagreement space and argues that the host should be viewed as a valid party in a multi-party argumentative activity.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Language and Dialogue LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS-

CiteScore

1.00

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： In our post-Cartesian times human abilities are regarded as integrated and interacting abilities. Speaking, thinking, perceiving, having emotions need to be studied in interaction. Integration and interaction take place in dialogue. Scholars are called upon to go beyond reductive methods of abstraction and division and to take up the challenge of coming to terms with the complex whole. The conclusions drawn from reasoning about human behaviour in the humanities and social sciences have finally been proven by experiments in the natural sciences, especially neurology and sociobiology. What happens in the black box, can now, at least in part, be made visible. The journal intends to be an explicitly interdisciplinary journal reaching out to any discipline dealing with human abilities on the basis of consilience or the unity of knowledge. It is the challenge of post-Cartesian science to tackle the issue of how body, mind and language are interconnected and dialogically put to action. The journal invites papers which deal with ‘language and dialogue’ as an integrated whole in different languages and cultures and in different areas: everyday, institutional and literary, in theory and in practice, in business, in court, in the media, in politics and academia. In particular the humanities and social sciences are addressed: linguistics, literary studies, pragmatics, dialogue analysis, communication and cultural studies, applied linguistics, business studies, media studies, studies of language and the law, philosophy, psychology, cognitive sciences, sociology, anthropology and others. The journal Language and Dialogue is a peer reviewed journal and associated with the book series Dialogue Studies, edited by Edda Weigand.