基于概率的调查和选择面板中框架变量和投票行为的条件分布

IF 2 2区 社会学 Q2 POLITICAL SCIENCE
N. Pekari, O. Lipps, C. Roberts, G. Lutz
{"title":"基于概率的调查和选择面板中框架变量和投票行为的条件分布","authors":"N. Pekari, O. Lipps, C. Roberts, G. Lutz","doi":"10.1111/spsr.12539","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Probability- based web surveys are increasingly challenged by decreasing response rates and high costs. A cheap and convenient solution is to use ‘opt- in’ online panels, which are based on non- probability samples. However, the quality of the data such panels produce is subject to debate. To improve our understanding in this regard, especially in the Swiss context, we compare conditional distributions of sociodemographic variables and voting behaviour of two probability- based web surveys and three opt- in panels. Indeed, point estimates in opt- in panels are well studied, but bivariate relationships between variables, ar-guably more important for researchers in political science research, have received less attention. Our analysis has the advantage of most variables of interest being included in the sampling frame and thus the true values are known for each conditional distribution. Our results show a lack of consistency and reproducibility in the results from opt- in panels, which leads us to recommend care when using this","PeriodicalId":46785,"journal":{"name":"Swiss Political Science Review","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-27","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Conditional distributions of frame variables and voting behaviour in probability‐based surveys and opt‐in panels\",\"authors\":\"N. Pekari, O. Lipps, C. Roberts, G. Lutz\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/spsr.12539\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Probability- based web surveys are increasingly challenged by decreasing response rates and high costs. A cheap and convenient solution is to use ‘opt- in’ online panels, which are based on non- probability samples. However, the quality of the data such panels produce is subject to debate. To improve our understanding in this regard, especially in the Swiss context, we compare conditional distributions of sociodemographic variables and voting behaviour of two probability- based web surveys and three opt- in panels. Indeed, point estimates in opt- in panels are well studied, but bivariate relationships between variables, ar-guably more important for researchers in political science research, have received less attention. Our analysis has the advantage of most variables of interest being included in the sampling frame and thus the true values are known for each conditional distribution. Our results show a lack of consistency and reproducibility in the results from opt- in panels, which leads us to recommend care when using this\",\"PeriodicalId\":46785,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Swiss Political Science Review\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-09-27\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Swiss Political Science Review\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12539\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"POLITICAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Swiss Political Science Review","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/spsr.12539","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

基于概率的网络调查越来越受到回复率下降和成本高的挑战。一个便宜而方便的解决方案是使用“选择加入”在线面板,这是基于非概率样本。然而,这些小组所提供的数据的质量存在争议。为了提高我们在这方面的理解,特别是在瑞士的背景下,我们比较了两个基于概率的网络调查和三个选择小组的社会人口变量和投票行为的条件分布。事实上,在选择加入小组中的点估计得到了很好的研究,但是变量之间的二元关系,可能对政治科学研究的研究人员更重要,却很少受到关注。我们的分析的优点是大多数感兴趣的变量都包含在采样帧中,因此每个条件分布的真实值都是已知的。我们的结果显示,从选择面板的结果缺乏一致性和可重复性,这导致我们建议谨慎使用
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Conditional distributions of frame variables and voting behaviour in probability‐based surveys and opt‐in panels
Probability- based web surveys are increasingly challenged by decreasing response rates and high costs. A cheap and convenient solution is to use ‘opt- in’ online panels, which are based on non- probability samples. However, the quality of the data such panels produce is subject to debate. To improve our understanding in this regard, especially in the Swiss context, we compare conditional distributions of sociodemographic variables and voting behaviour of two probability- based web surveys and three opt- in panels. Indeed, point estimates in opt- in panels are well studied, but bivariate relationships between variables, ar-guably more important for researchers in political science research, have received less attention. Our analysis has the advantage of most variables of interest being included in the sampling frame and thus the true values are known for each conditional distribution. Our results show a lack of consistency and reproducibility in the results from opt- in panels, which leads us to recommend care when using this
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Swiss Political Science Review
Swiss Political Science Review POLITICAL SCIENCE-
CiteScore
3.70
自引率
4.80%
发文量
47
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信