静脉注射艾司洛尔降低外伤性脑损伤后颅内压

IF 0.4 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES
Tayebeh Zarei, Arzoo Ahmadi, A. Najafi, M. Mojtahedzadeh, K. Basiri, Somayeh Mehrpour, Khalil Komlakh, Kaveh Hedayati Emami
{"title":"静脉注射艾司洛尔降低外伤性脑损伤后颅内压","authors":"Tayebeh Zarei, Arzoo Ahmadi, A. Najafi, M. Mojtahedzadeh, K. Basiri, Somayeh Mehrpour, Khalil Komlakh, Kaveh Hedayati Emami","doi":"10.5812/ans.121425","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Several studies have examined the possible role of beta-blockers, including esmolol, in controlling intracranial pressure (ICP). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of esmolol on ICP in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Methods: In this case-control study, all TBI patients with ICP > 20 cmH2O, who were admitted to ICU during the study period, were included. Some patients received standard treatment plus esmolol (500 μg/kg and then 50 mg/kg/min for 24 hours), and some others just received standard treatment with no esmolol. The patients were monitored, and the ICP measurement was performed via inserted intra-ventricular catheter. The ICP and vital signs were measured and recorded before, 8, 16, and 24 hours after starting the treatment in the two groups, and the findings were then compared. Results: Twenty-two patients (13 males and 9 females) were included in this study, of whom 12 patients received esmolol, and 10 patients were in the control group. The mean age of those who received esmolol was smaller than those who did not receive it (46.6 ± 18.5 vs. 62.3 ± 19.1 years; P = 0.08). Moreover, the mean length of the ICU stay was smaller in the esmolol receivers than the control group (5.6 ± 1.1 vs. 17.3 ± 7.7 days; P = 0.04 (there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of mortality rates (P = 0.30). The variations of the vital signs over time was not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05); however, the mean of ICP was lower in those who received esmolol compared to the control group at all checkpoints (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Those patients with TBI who received esmolol as part of their ICP control management in ICU had lower ICP than those who received no esmolol.","PeriodicalId":43970,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Neuroscience","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Intravenous Esmolol for Intracranial Pressure Reduction After Traumatic Brain Injury\",\"authors\":\"Tayebeh Zarei, Arzoo Ahmadi, A. Najafi, M. Mojtahedzadeh, K. Basiri, Somayeh Mehrpour, Khalil Komlakh, Kaveh Hedayati Emami\",\"doi\":\"10.5812/ans.121425\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Several studies have examined the possible role of beta-blockers, including esmolol, in controlling intracranial pressure (ICP). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of esmolol on ICP in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Methods: In this case-control study, all TBI patients with ICP > 20 cmH2O, who were admitted to ICU during the study period, were included. Some patients received standard treatment plus esmolol (500 μg/kg and then 50 mg/kg/min for 24 hours), and some others just received standard treatment with no esmolol. The patients were monitored, and the ICP measurement was performed via inserted intra-ventricular catheter. The ICP and vital signs were measured and recorded before, 8, 16, and 24 hours after starting the treatment in the two groups, and the findings were then compared. Results: Twenty-two patients (13 males and 9 females) were included in this study, of whom 12 patients received esmolol, and 10 patients were in the control group. The mean age of those who received esmolol was smaller than those who did not receive it (46.6 ± 18.5 vs. 62.3 ± 19.1 years; P = 0.08). Moreover, the mean length of the ICU stay was smaller in the esmolol receivers than the control group (5.6 ± 1.1 vs. 17.3 ± 7.7 days; P = 0.04 (there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of mortality rates (P = 0.30). The variations of the vital signs over time was not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05); however, the mean of ICP was lower in those who received esmolol compared to the control group at all checkpoints (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Those patients with TBI who received esmolol as part of their ICP control management in ICU had lower ICP than those who received no esmolol.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43970,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Archives of Neuroscience\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-03-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Archives of Neuroscience\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5812/ans.121425\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NEUROSCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Neuroscience","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5812/ans.121425","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:几项研究已经检验了包括艾司洛尔在内的β受体阻滞剂在控制颅内压(ICP)中的可能作用。本研究旨在评价艾司洛尔对重型颅脑损伤患者ICP的影响。方法:在本病例对照研究中,纳入研究期间入住ICU的所有ICP>20cmH2O的TBI患者。一些患者接受了标准治疗加用艾司洛尔(500μg/kg,然后50 mg/kg/分钟,持续24小时),而另一些患者则只接受了不加艾司洛尔的标准治疗。对患者进行监测,并通过插入心室内导管进行ICP测量。在开始治疗前、8小时、16小时和24小时测量并记录两组的ICP和生命体征,然后比较结果。结果:本研究包括22名患者(13名男性和9名女性),其中12名患者接受艾司洛尔治疗,10名患者为对照组。艾司洛尔组的平均年龄小于未接受艾司洛尔的组(46.6±18.5 vs.62.3±19.1岁;P=0.08),艾司洛尔受试者的ICU平均住院时间小于对照组(5.6±1.1 vs.17.3±7.7天;P=0.04(两组死亡率无显著差异(P=0.030)。两组生命体征随时间的变化没有显著差异(P>0.05);然而,在所有检查点,接受艾司洛尔治疗的TBI患者的ICP平均值均低于对照组(P<0.05)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Intravenous Esmolol for Intracranial Pressure Reduction After Traumatic Brain Injury
Background: Several studies have examined the possible role of beta-blockers, including esmolol, in controlling intracranial pressure (ICP). This study aimed to evaluate the effect of esmolol on ICP in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Methods: In this case-control study, all TBI patients with ICP > 20 cmH2O, who were admitted to ICU during the study period, were included. Some patients received standard treatment plus esmolol (500 μg/kg and then 50 mg/kg/min for 24 hours), and some others just received standard treatment with no esmolol. The patients were monitored, and the ICP measurement was performed via inserted intra-ventricular catheter. The ICP and vital signs were measured and recorded before, 8, 16, and 24 hours after starting the treatment in the two groups, and the findings were then compared. Results: Twenty-two patients (13 males and 9 females) were included in this study, of whom 12 patients received esmolol, and 10 patients were in the control group. The mean age of those who received esmolol was smaller than those who did not receive it (46.6 ± 18.5 vs. 62.3 ± 19.1 years; P = 0.08). Moreover, the mean length of the ICU stay was smaller in the esmolol receivers than the control group (5.6 ± 1.1 vs. 17.3 ± 7.7 days; P = 0.04 (there was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of mortality rates (P = 0.30). The variations of the vital signs over time was not significantly different between the two groups (P > 0.05); however, the mean of ICP was lower in those who received esmolol compared to the control group at all checkpoints (P < 0.05). Conclusions: Those patients with TBI who received esmolol as part of their ICP control management in ICU had lower ICP than those who received no esmolol.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Archives of Neuroscience
Archives of Neuroscience NEUROSCIENCES-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: Archives of neuroscience is a clinical and basic journal which is informative to all practitioners like Neurosurgeons, Neurologists, Psychiatrists, Neuroscientists. It is the official journal of Brain and Spinal Injury Research Center. The Major theme of this journal is to follow the path of scientific collaboration, spontaneity, and goodwill for the future, by providing up-to-date knowledge for the readers. The journal aims at covering different fields, as the name implies, ranging from research in basic and clinical sciences to core topics such as patient care, education, procuring and correct utilization of resources and bringing to limelight the cherished goals of the institute in providing a standard care for the physically disabled patients. This quarterly journal offers a venue for our researchers and scientists to vent their innovative and constructive research works. The scope of the journal is as far wide as the universe as being declared by the name of the journal, but our aim is to pursue our sacred goals in providing a panacea for the intractable ailments, which leave a psychological element in the daily life of such patients. This authoritative clinical and basic journal was founded by Professor Madjid Samii in 2012.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信