外侧关节外肌腱固定术在前交叉韧带重建中的应用:磁共振成像证据及临床随访

L. Singh, S. Sinha, I. Kumar, A. Verma, S. Saraf, Tejbali Singh, S. Pandey
{"title":"外侧关节外肌腱固定术在前交叉韧带重建中的应用:磁共振成像证据及临床随访","authors":"L. Singh, S. Sinha, I. Kumar, A. Verma, S. Saraf, Tejbali Singh, S. Pandey","doi":"10.4103/jodp.jodp_17_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is frequently associated with anterolateral ligament injury (ALL) and results in residual instability at follow-up. It was hypothesized that patients who underwent combined ACL and lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) reconstruction would exhibit less residual laxity, better clinical outcomes, and better graft incorporation on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as well. Patient and Methods: Sixty-four patients with concomitant ACL and ALL injuries who were operated over a period of 2 years were enrolled between 2016 and 2018. Two groups of patients were evaluated prospectively. Eighteen patients in control Group B underwent anatomical ACL reconstruction alone, and 20 in test Group A underwent ACL reconstruction combined with LET. Exclusions were multiligament injuries, chondral injury, meniscus tear, and ramp lesion. Follow-up by Lysholm and modified Cincinnati knee rating was done and MRI for status of graft at least 1-year postoperative. Results: After excluding dropout or inadequate follow-up, Group A (n = 20) with ACL + LET was compared with Group B (n = 18), with isolated ACL reconstruction, at final median follow-up of 18 months. There were no significant differences between groups regarding gender, age, and duration of injury. Regarding functional outcome scores, patients in the LET group presented better results on both the clinical scoring (P < 0.0001). In addition, patients in the LET group had better graft uptake on MRI and no pivoting at physical examination. Regarding graft failures, the isolated ACL reconstruction group had 5 and the LET group had 1 failure. Conclusion: The combined ACL and LET reconstruction in patients with ACL injury is an effective and safe solution and leads to good functional outcomes with no increase in complications and aids in early return to preinjury activities with a surviving healthy graft.","PeriodicalId":34809,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Orthopaedic Diseases and Traumatology","volume":"4 1","pages":"72 - 79"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of lateral extra-articular tenodesis on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadrupled hamstring graft: Magnetic resonance imaging evidence and clinical follow-up\",\"authors\":\"L. Singh, S. Sinha, I. Kumar, A. Verma, S. Saraf, Tejbali Singh, S. Pandey\",\"doi\":\"10.4103/jodp.jodp_17_21\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Background: Isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is frequently associated with anterolateral ligament injury (ALL) and results in residual instability at follow-up. It was hypothesized that patients who underwent combined ACL and lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) reconstruction would exhibit less residual laxity, better clinical outcomes, and better graft incorporation on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as well. Patient and Methods: Sixty-four patients with concomitant ACL and ALL injuries who were operated over a period of 2 years were enrolled between 2016 and 2018. Two groups of patients were evaluated prospectively. Eighteen patients in control Group B underwent anatomical ACL reconstruction alone, and 20 in test Group A underwent ACL reconstruction combined with LET. Exclusions were multiligament injuries, chondral injury, meniscus tear, and ramp lesion. Follow-up by Lysholm and modified Cincinnati knee rating was done and MRI for status of graft at least 1-year postoperative. Results: After excluding dropout or inadequate follow-up, Group A (n = 20) with ACL + LET was compared with Group B (n = 18), with isolated ACL reconstruction, at final median follow-up of 18 months. There were no significant differences between groups regarding gender, age, and duration of injury. Regarding functional outcome scores, patients in the LET group presented better results on both the clinical scoring (P < 0.0001). In addition, patients in the LET group had better graft uptake on MRI and no pivoting at physical examination. Regarding graft failures, the isolated ACL reconstruction group had 5 and the LET group had 1 failure. Conclusion: The combined ACL and LET reconstruction in patients with ACL injury is an effective and safe solution and leads to good functional outcomes with no increase in complications and aids in early return to preinjury activities with a surviving healthy graft.\",\"PeriodicalId\":34809,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Diseases and Traumatology\",\"volume\":\"4 1\",\"pages\":\"72 - 79\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Orthopaedic Diseases and Traumatology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4103/jodp.jodp_17_21\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Orthopaedic Diseases and Traumatology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/jodp.jodp_17_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:孤立前交叉韧带(ACL)重建经常与前外侧韧带损伤(ALL)相关,并在随访中导致残余不稳定。假设联合前交叉韧带和外侧关节外肌腱固定术(LET)重建的患者在后续磁共振成像(MRI)中表现出更少的残余松弛,更好的临床结果和更好的移植物融合。患者和方法:在2016年至2018年期间,64例合并ACL和ALL损伤的患者在2年内进行了手术。对两组患者进行前瞻性评价。对照组18例单纯行解剖性ACL重建,实验组20例行ACL重建联合LET。排除多韧带损伤、软骨损伤、半月板撕裂和斜坡损伤。通过Lysholm和改良的辛辛那提膝关节评分进行随访,并进行MRI检查移植后至少1年的状态。结果:在排除退出或随访不充分后,将ACL + LET组(n = 20)与孤立ACL重建组(n = 18)进行比较,最终中位随访时间为18个月。在性别、年龄和损伤持续时间方面,组间无显著差异。在功能结局评分方面,LET组患者在两项临床评分上均有较好的结果(P < 0.0001)。此外,LET组患者在MRI上有更好的移植物摄取,体格检查无旋转。移植失败方面,孤立ACL重建组5例,LET组1例。结论:ACL和LET联合重建对ACL损伤患者是一种有效和安全的解决方案,具有良好的功能结果,不会增加并发症,并有助于早期恢复损伤前的健康移植物活动。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Efficacy of lateral extra-articular tenodesis on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with quadrupled hamstring graft: Magnetic resonance imaging evidence and clinical follow-up
Background: Isolated anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction is frequently associated with anterolateral ligament injury (ALL) and results in residual instability at follow-up. It was hypothesized that patients who underwent combined ACL and lateral extra-articular tenodesis (LET) reconstruction would exhibit less residual laxity, better clinical outcomes, and better graft incorporation on follow-up magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) as well. Patient and Methods: Sixty-four patients with concomitant ACL and ALL injuries who were operated over a period of 2 years were enrolled between 2016 and 2018. Two groups of patients were evaluated prospectively. Eighteen patients in control Group B underwent anatomical ACL reconstruction alone, and 20 in test Group A underwent ACL reconstruction combined with LET. Exclusions were multiligament injuries, chondral injury, meniscus tear, and ramp lesion. Follow-up by Lysholm and modified Cincinnati knee rating was done and MRI for status of graft at least 1-year postoperative. Results: After excluding dropout or inadequate follow-up, Group A (n = 20) with ACL + LET was compared with Group B (n = 18), with isolated ACL reconstruction, at final median follow-up of 18 months. There were no significant differences between groups regarding gender, age, and duration of injury. Regarding functional outcome scores, patients in the LET group presented better results on both the clinical scoring (P < 0.0001). In addition, patients in the LET group had better graft uptake on MRI and no pivoting at physical examination. Regarding graft failures, the isolated ACL reconstruction group had 5 and the LET group had 1 failure. Conclusion: The combined ACL and LET reconstruction in patients with ACL injury is an effective and safe solution and leads to good functional outcomes with no increase in complications and aids in early return to preinjury activities with a surviving healthy graft.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
审稿时长
17 weeks
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信