从侧面秀到中心环：大众娱乐史

IF 0.3 3区艺术学 0 THEATER

NEW THEATRE QUARTERLY Pub Date : 2023-07-28 DOI:10.1017/S0266464X23000167

L. Senelick

{"title":"从侧面秀到中心环：大众娱乐史","authors":"L. Senelick","doi":"10.1017/S0266464X23000167","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The academic interest in popular entertainment was long retarded by a class attitude that regarded it as a cultural phenomenon of inferior quality. Those who researched it were collectors and enthusiasts rather than professional scholars. The disdain of the Frankfurt School was also a factor. In the 1960s, with the rise of leisure studies and a Marxist-inflected interest in working-class culture, this began to change. The study of popular forms is now an accepted, even dominant part of the humanities curriculum, though still occasionally tinged with apology.","PeriodicalId":43990,"journal":{"name":"NEW THEATRE QUARTERLY","volume":"39 1","pages":"272 - 279"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Sideshow to Centre Ring: The Historiography of Popular Entertainment\",\"authors\":\"L. Senelick\",\"doi\":\"10.1017/S0266464X23000167\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The academic interest in popular entertainment was long retarded by a class attitude that regarded it as a cultural phenomenon of inferior quality. Those who researched it were collectors and enthusiasts rather than professional scholars. The disdain of the Frankfurt School was also a factor. In the 1960s, with the rise of leisure studies and a Marxist-inflected interest in working-class culture, this began to change. The study of popular forms is now an accepted, even dominant part of the humanities curriculum, though still occasionally tinged with apology.\",\"PeriodicalId\":43990,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"NEW THEATRE QUARTERLY\",\"volume\":\"39 1\",\"pages\":\"272 - 279\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2023-07-28\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"NEW THEATRE QUARTERLY\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266464X23000167\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"艺术学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"0\",\"JCRName\":\"THEATER\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"NEW THEATRE QUARTERLY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S0266464X23000167","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"THEATER","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

学术界对大众娱乐的兴趣长期以来一直被一种阶级态度所阻碍，这种态度认为大众娱乐是一种劣质的文化现象。研究它的人是收藏家和爱好者，而不是专业学者。法兰克福学派的蔑视也是一个因素。20世纪60年代，随着休闲研究的兴起和马克思主义对工人阶级文化的浓厚兴趣，这种情况开始改变。对流行形式的研究现在已经成为人文学科课程中一个公认的、甚至占主导地位的部分，尽管偶尔也会有道歉的意味。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

查看原文本刊更多论文

From Sideshow to Centre Ring: The Historiography of Popular Entertainment

The academic interest in popular entertainment was long retarded by a class attitude that regarded it as a cultural phenomenon of inferior quality. Those who researched it were collectors and enthusiasts rather than professional scholars. The disdain of the Frankfurt School was also a factor. In the 1960s, with the rise of leisure studies and a Marxist-inflected interest in working-class culture, this began to change. The study of popular forms is now an accepted, even dominant part of the humanities curriculum, though still occasionally tinged with apology.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

NEW THEATRE QUARTERLY THEATER-

CiteScore

0.30

自引率

0.00%

发文量

期刊介绍： New Theatre Quarterly provides a vital international forum where theatrical scholarship and practice can meet and where prevailing dramatic assumptions can be subjected to vigorous critical questioning. It shows that theatre history has a contemporary relevance, that theatre studies need a methodology and that theatre criticism needs a language. The journal publishes news, analysis and debate within the field of theatre studies.