提前护理计划:比较新加坡养老院居民和医疗保健专业人员的观点。

IF 1.1 Q4 NURSING
Toh Hui Jin, L. Tan, Siew Chee Weng, Sim Lai Kiow, J. Low
{"title":"提前护理计划:比较新加坡养老院居民和医疗保健专业人员的观点。","authors":"Toh Hui Jin, L. Tan, Siew Chee Weng, Sim Lai Kiow, J. Low","doi":"10.12968/ijpn.2022.28.4.178","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\nWith more frail elderly living and likely to die in nursing homes, advance care planning (ACP) is critical in overall efforts to provide good palliative care. However, it is unclear how willing older, vulnerable residents in nursing homes are to take on an active role in care decisions.\n\n\nAIM\nThe objective of this pilot study was to examine nursing homes' healthcare professionals' and residents' views on ACP and the extent of similarities and differences in their views.\n\n\nMETHODS\nOur sample of 24 healthcare professionals and 24 residents were identified and recruited through contacts established from existing collaborations with the nursing homes. Surveys were administered to the participants by a trained research assistant between April 2015 and August 2015.\n\n\nRESULTS\nAlmost all the healthcare professionals (95.8%) would like to make an ACP for themselves in the future, while residents were divided in their choices (P<<0.01). Most residents (79.1%) felt that the most important guide for their surrogate in making decisions for them when they lose decision-making capacity should be based on their best interests. However, most healthcare professionals (75.0%) felt that it should be based on the resident's wishes and values.\n\n\nCONCLUSIONS\nHealthcare professionals tended to overestimate the importance of patient autonomy compared to the residents. This study demonstrates that as much as advocacy and awareness are ongoing, nursing home residents' motivation to participate in ACP is lacking. The lack of motivation in ACP participation could be due to medical paternalism and familial determination, which have been a cultural norm for older Singaporeans. This study demonstrates there is a lack of cultural sensitivity in this group of healthcare professionals in approaching nursing home residents' end-of-life care decision-making.","PeriodicalId":47415,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Palliative Nursing","volume":"28 4 1","pages":"178-185"},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-04-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Advance care planning: comparing the views of residents and healthcare professionals in nursing homes in Singapore.\",\"authors\":\"Toh Hui Jin, L. Tan, Siew Chee Weng, Sim Lai Kiow, J. Low\",\"doi\":\"10.12968/ijpn.2022.28.4.178\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\nWith more frail elderly living and likely to die in nursing homes, advance care planning (ACP) is critical in overall efforts to provide good palliative care. However, it is unclear how willing older, vulnerable residents in nursing homes are to take on an active role in care decisions.\\n\\n\\nAIM\\nThe objective of this pilot study was to examine nursing homes' healthcare professionals' and residents' views on ACP and the extent of similarities and differences in their views.\\n\\n\\nMETHODS\\nOur sample of 24 healthcare professionals and 24 residents were identified and recruited through contacts established from existing collaborations with the nursing homes. Surveys were administered to the participants by a trained research assistant between April 2015 and August 2015.\\n\\n\\nRESULTS\\nAlmost all the healthcare professionals (95.8%) would like to make an ACP for themselves in the future, while residents were divided in their choices (P<<0.01). Most residents (79.1%) felt that the most important guide for their surrogate in making decisions for them when they lose decision-making capacity should be based on their best interests. However, most healthcare professionals (75.0%) felt that it should be based on the resident's wishes and values.\\n\\n\\nCONCLUSIONS\\nHealthcare professionals tended to overestimate the importance of patient autonomy compared to the residents. This study demonstrates that as much as advocacy and awareness are ongoing, nursing home residents' motivation to participate in ACP is lacking. The lack of motivation in ACP participation could be due to medical paternalism and familial determination, which have been a cultural norm for older Singaporeans. This study demonstrates there is a lack of cultural sensitivity in this group of healthcare professionals in approaching nursing home residents' end-of-life care decision-making.\",\"PeriodicalId\":47415,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Palliative Nursing\",\"volume\":\"28 4 1\",\"pages\":\"178-185\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-04-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Palliative Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2022.28.4.178\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Palliative Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12968/ijpn.2022.28.4.178","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

随着越来越多体弱多病的老年人在养老院生活和死亡,提前护理计划(ACP)在提供良好姑息治疗的整体努力中至关重要。然而,目前尚不清楚养老院中脆弱的老年人是否愿意在护理决策中发挥积极作用。目的本初步研究旨在探讨安老院舍的医护人员和住客对ACP的看法,以及他们看法的异同程度。方法通过与养老院建立的合作关系,确定并招募了24名卫生保健专业人员和24名居民作为样本。在2015年4月至2015年8月期间,由一名训练有素的研究助理对参与者进行调查。结果绝大多数医护人员(95.8%)表示将来会为自己制定ACP,而居民的选择有差异(P<<0.01)。大多数居民(79.1%)认为,当他们失去决策能力时,他们的代理人为他们做决策最重要的指导是基于他们的最大利益。然而,大多数医疗保健专业人员(75.0%)认为应该基于居民的意愿和价值观。结论与住院医师相比,医护人员倾向于高估患者自主性的重要性。本研究表明,尽管倡导和意识正在进行,但养老院居民参与ACP的动机缺乏。缺乏参与ACP的动机可能是由于医疗家长式作风和家庭决心,这已经成为新加坡老年人的文化规范。本研究表明,在接近养老院居民的临终关怀决策中,这组医疗保健专业人员缺乏文化敏感性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Advance care planning: comparing the views of residents and healthcare professionals in nursing homes in Singapore.
BACKGROUND With more frail elderly living and likely to die in nursing homes, advance care planning (ACP) is critical in overall efforts to provide good palliative care. However, it is unclear how willing older, vulnerable residents in nursing homes are to take on an active role in care decisions. AIM The objective of this pilot study was to examine nursing homes' healthcare professionals' and residents' views on ACP and the extent of similarities and differences in their views. METHODS Our sample of 24 healthcare professionals and 24 residents were identified and recruited through contacts established from existing collaborations with the nursing homes. Surveys were administered to the participants by a trained research assistant between April 2015 and August 2015. RESULTS Almost all the healthcare professionals (95.8%) would like to make an ACP for themselves in the future, while residents were divided in their choices (P<<0.01). Most residents (79.1%) felt that the most important guide for their surrogate in making decisions for them when they lose decision-making capacity should be based on their best interests. However, most healthcare professionals (75.0%) felt that it should be based on the resident's wishes and values. CONCLUSIONS Healthcare professionals tended to overestimate the importance of patient autonomy compared to the residents. This study demonstrates that as much as advocacy and awareness are ongoing, nursing home residents' motivation to participate in ACP is lacking. The lack of motivation in ACP participation could be due to medical paternalism and familial determination, which have been a cultural norm for older Singaporeans. This study demonstrates there is a lack of cultural sensitivity in this group of healthcare professionals in approaching nursing home residents' end-of-life care decision-making.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.20
自引率
10.00%
发文量
65
期刊介绍: Since its launch in 1995, International Journal of Palliative Nursing (IJPN) has been committed to promoting excellence in palliative and hospice care. It is now established as the leading journal for nurses working in this most demanding profession, covering all aspects of palliative care nursing in a way which is intelligent, helpful and accessible, and so useful in daily practice. The aim of IJPN is to provide nurses with essential information to help them deliver the best possible care and support for their patients. Each issue contains an unparalleled range of peer-reviewed clinical, professional and educational articles, as well as helpful and informative information on practical, legal and policy issues of importance to all palliative nurses.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术官方微信