微博拯救?中国公民与政府关系中的社交媒体使用研究

IF 2.4 Q2 INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE
V. Homburg, Rebecca Moody
{"title":"微博拯救?中国公民与政府关系中的社交媒体使用研究","authors":"V. Homburg, Rebecca Moody","doi":"10.1108/tg-06-2021-0101","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\nPurpose\nIn this study, the authors explain citizens’ adoption of social media in citizen–government relations in China, a country that blends an authoritarian governance regime with limited tolerance of and responsiveness to online citizen participation.\n\n\nDesign/methodology/approach\nOriginal survey data were gathered using a vignette survey among 307 respondents living in the People’s Republic of China. Multivariate analysis of the data was used to test four hypotheses and identify antecedents of Chinese citizens’ social media adoption for “thin” participation purposes.\n\n\nFindings\nCitizens’ perceived impact of “thin” participation, citizens’ skills and capabilities and citizens’ trust in institutions are significantly associated with citizens’ social media adoption. Social media anxiety was found not to be associated with Chinese citizens’ social media adoption.\n\n\nResearch limitations/implications\nThis study demonstrates how vignettes can be used to study adoption of technological and institutional innovations in an authoritarian governance regime and how in this context existing adoption theories can be extended with notions of institutional trust to adequately explain citizens’ adoption of technological and institutional innovations in citizen–government relations.\n\n\nSocial implications\nAlthough some argue that social media activity could potentially mitigate democratic deficits caused by the state, in the case of China, the intertwinement of state and social media platform renders this argument unsustainable.\n\n\nOriginality/value\nThis study is one of the few systematic survey studies focusing on Chinese citizens’ adoption of social media in citizen–government relations.\n","PeriodicalId":51696,"journal":{"name":"Transforming Government- People Process and Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-09-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Weibo to the Rescue? A study of social media use in citizen–government relations in China\",\"authors\":\"V. Homburg, Rebecca Moody\",\"doi\":\"10.1108/tg-06-2021-0101\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\nPurpose\\nIn this study, the authors explain citizens’ adoption of social media in citizen–government relations in China, a country that blends an authoritarian governance regime with limited tolerance of and responsiveness to online citizen participation.\\n\\n\\nDesign/methodology/approach\\nOriginal survey data were gathered using a vignette survey among 307 respondents living in the People’s Republic of China. Multivariate analysis of the data was used to test four hypotheses and identify antecedents of Chinese citizens’ social media adoption for “thin” participation purposes.\\n\\n\\nFindings\\nCitizens’ perceived impact of “thin” participation, citizens’ skills and capabilities and citizens’ trust in institutions are significantly associated with citizens’ social media adoption. Social media anxiety was found not to be associated with Chinese citizens’ social media adoption.\\n\\n\\nResearch limitations/implications\\nThis study demonstrates how vignettes can be used to study adoption of technological and institutional innovations in an authoritarian governance regime and how in this context existing adoption theories can be extended with notions of institutional trust to adequately explain citizens’ adoption of technological and institutional innovations in citizen–government relations.\\n\\n\\nSocial implications\\nAlthough some argue that social media activity could potentially mitigate democratic deficits caused by the state, in the case of China, the intertwinement of state and social media platform renders this argument unsustainable.\\n\\n\\nOriginality/value\\nThis study is one of the few systematic survey studies focusing on Chinese citizens’ adoption of social media in citizen–government relations.\\n\",\"PeriodicalId\":51696,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Transforming Government- People Process and Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2021-09-13\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"2\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Transforming Government- People Process and Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-06-2021-0101\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Transforming Government- People Process and Policy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/tg-06-2021-0101","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

摘要

在本研究中,作者解释了中国公民在公民-政府关系中对社交媒体的采用,中国是一个威权治理体制,对在线公民参与的容忍和回应有限的国家。设计/方法/方法通过对居住在中华人民共和国的307名受访者进行小问卷调查收集原始调查数据。数据的多变量分析用于检验四个假设,并确定中国公民出于“薄”参与目的而采用社交媒体的前因。发现公民对“稀薄”参与的感知影响、公民的技能和能力以及公民对机构的信任与公民的社交媒体采用显著相关。社交媒体焦虑与中国公民的社交媒体使用无关。本研究展示了如何使用小插曲来研究威权治理制度下技术和制度创新的采用,以及在这种背景下,如何将现有的采用理论与制度信任的概念进行扩展,以充分解释公民在公民-政府关系中对技术和制度创新的采用。尽管一些人认为社交媒体活动可能会潜在地缓解国家造成的民主赤字,但就中国而言,国家和社交媒体平台的交织使这种观点难以为续。独创性/价值本研究是少数关注中国公民在公民与政府关系中使用社交媒体的系统调查研究之一。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Weibo to the Rescue? A study of social media use in citizen–government relations in China
Purpose In this study, the authors explain citizens’ adoption of social media in citizen–government relations in China, a country that blends an authoritarian governance regime with limited tolerance of and responsiveness to online citizen participation. Design/methodology/approach Original survey data were gathered using a vignette survey among 307 respondents living in the People’s Republic of China. Multivariate analysis of the data was used to test four hypotheses and identify antecedents of Chinese citizens’ social media adoption for “thin” participation purposes. Findings Citizens’ perceived impact of “thin” participation, citizens’ skills and capabilities and citizens’ trust in institutions are significantly associated with citizens’ social media adoption. Social media anxiety was found not to be associated with Chinese citizens’ social media adoption. Research limitations/implications This study demonstrates how vignettes can be used to study adoption of technological and institutional innovations in an authoritarian governance regime and how in this context existing adoption theories can be extended with notions of institutional trust to adequately explain citizens’ adoption of technological and institutional innovations in citizen–government relations. Social implications Although some argue that social media activity could potentially mitigate democratic deficits caused by the state, in the case of China, the intertwinement of state and social media platform renders this argument unsustainable. Originality/value This study is one of the few systematic survey studies focusing on Chinese citizens’ adoption of social media in citizen–government relations.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Transforming Government- People Process and Policy
Transforming Government- People Process and Policy INFORMATION SCIENCE & LIBRARY SCIENCE-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
11.50%
发文量
44
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信