疫情期间与COVID-19相关的出版物中的方法学问题

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL
B. Çakır
{"title":"疫情期间与COVID-19相关的出版物中的方法学问题","authors":"B. Çakır","doi":"10.36519/10.36519/kd.2022.4462","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"SARS-CoV-2 has led to a global public health problem with its quick spread in a naive population, devastatingly affecting social and economic lives. The most positive effect of the pandemic has been on the novel, from bench-to-bedside scientific research, methodology, and publications. The unprecedented speed in planning, conducting, and reporting research activities has improved patient care and public policies during the pandemic. However, some overlooked methodological concerns have hindered the intrinsic and extrinsic validity of the publications. This study, based on peer-reviewed medical journals over the pandemic, aimed to increase awareness of common methodological issues that may improve the quality of evidence upon correction.","PeriodicalId":44309,"journal":{"name":"Klimik Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Methodological Issues in COVID-19-Related Publications During the Pandemic\",\"authors\":\"B. Çakır\",\"doi\":\"10.36519/10.36519/kd.2022.4462\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"SARS-CoV-2 has led to a global public health problem with its quick spread in a naive population, devastatingly affecting social and economic lives. The most positive effect of the pandemic has been on the novel, from bench-to-bedside scientific research, methodology, and publications. The unprecedented speed in planning, conducting, and reporting research activities has improved patient care and public policies during the pandemic. However, some overlooked methodological concerns have hindered the intrinsic and extrinsic validity of the publications. This study, based on peer-reviewed medical journals over the pandemic, aimed to increase awareness of common methodological issues that may improve the quality of evidence upon correction.\",\"PeriodicalId\":44309,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Klimik Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2022-12-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Klimik Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36519/10.36519/kd.2022.4462\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klimik Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36519/10.36519/kd.2022.4462","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

SARS-CoV-2在天真的人群中迅速传播,造成了全球公共卫生问题,对社会和经济生活造成了毁灭性影响。此次大流行最积极的影响体现在从实验室到临床的科学研究、方法和出版物方面。在规划、开展和报告研究活动方面前所未有的速度改善了大流行期间的患者护理和公共政策。然而,一些被忽视的方法问题阻碍了出版物的内在和外在有效性。这项研究基于大流行期间同行评议的医学期刊,旨在提高对常见方法学问题的认识,这些问题可能会提高证据纠正后的质量。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
Methodological Issues in COVID-19-Related Publications During the Pandemic
SARS-CoV-2 has led to a global public health problem with its quick spread in a naive population, devastatingly affecting social and economic lives. The most positive effect of the pandemic has been on the novel, from bench-to-bedside scientific research, methodology, and publications. The unprecedented speed in planning, conducting, and reporting research activities has improved patient care and public policies during the pandemic. However, some overlooked methodological concerns have hindered the intrinsic and extrinsic validity of the publications. This study, based on peer-reviewed medical journals over the pandemic, aimed to increase awareness of common methodological issues that may improve the quality of evidence upon correction.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Klimik Journal
Klimik Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
39
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
确定
请完成安全验证×
copy
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
右上角分享
点击右上角分享
0
联系我们:info@booksci.cn Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。 Copyright © 2023 布克学术 All rights reserved.
京ICP备2023020795号-1
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术官方微信